Photo via The Independent

Trump’s attorney general won’t rule out DOJ action to stop states from certifying midterms results

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Woodward, A. (2026, October 22). Trump’s attorney general won’t rule out DOJ action to stop states from certifying midterms results. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/todd-blanche-doj-election-results-midterms-b3071798.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-10-22 · by Alex Woodward

Quick Summary

Attorney General Todd Blanche declined to rule out potential Department of Justice action to block states from certifying midterm election results during a Thursday press conference. He did not specify any intentions but acknowledged hypothetical scenarios where intervention might occur without detailing them further. This statement follows recent DOJ investigations into alleged voter fraud and unsuccessful lawsuits challenging voting procedures in multiple states, particularly targeting California’s all-mail elections. Critics like David Becker of the Center for Election and Innovation Research argue that such threats are performative since federal law strictly limits the Justice Department's role in election administration.
Written by AI on 2026-10-22, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Attorney General Todd Blanche declined to rule out the possibility that the Department of Justice (DOJ) could intervene and block states from certifying midterm election results in extreme hypothetical scenarios, though he emphasized this was not his intention. Speaking to reporters on October 20, 2026, in Virginia, Blanche stated there were no specific circumstances under which the DOJ would interfere but did not completely rule out intervention if a "doomsday scenario" occurred. The DOJ's role is primarily limited to safeguarding civil rights and prosecuting election law violations, as per federal law. This stance has raised concerns about potential interference in state election processes, particularly amid ongoing investigations into alleged voter fraud by the Justice Department.

Written for “Dobbs Won't Rule Out DOJ Action” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Dobbs Won't Rule Out DOJ Action
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 30% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different events involving separate actions by U.S. federal authorities regarding election integrity and voting rights.”
Fox News
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses a potential DOJ action against states certifying election results in general terms, while Article B reports on a specific lawsuit filed by the Trump Justice Department to block Alaska Senate election results due to voter confusion.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses a hypothetical scenario where the DOJ might take action, while Article B reports on an actual lawsuit filed by the Justice Department in Alaska.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 2 of 57 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different scenarios involving the Attorney General's potential actions regarding election results, with Article A discussing a general hypothetical and Article B addressing a specific lawsuit in Alaska.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 9 of 58 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different actions and timelines within Trump's justice department related to the midterms, with Article A focusing on raids and voter fraud charges and Article B on the potential for blocking certification of election results.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A describes a lawsuit filed by Democrats, while Article B reports on comments made by Attorney General Todd Blanche regarding potential DOJ action. Although related, they describe different specific occurrences.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles discuss legal actions and threats by the Trump administration regarding elections, they describe distinct events: one is a lawsuit filed by Democrats, while the other is an interview with Attorney General Todd Blanche discussing potential DOJ action.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 7 of 19 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses hypothetical scenarios about potential DOJ action, while Article B reports on a specific lawsuit filed by Trump's DOJ against Alaska to block certification of election results.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 2 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles refer to different dates and contexts regarding Attorney General Todd Blanche's statements about potential DOJ actions related to election certification.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
30%
8 of 27 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3563 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alex Woodward
55 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “Haley said what few people are willing to say,” he wrote.
🔮 A fresh round of polling data in the final hours before Election Day shows Democratic candidates leading virtually every battleground state that will likely determine which party controls the Senate.
🔮 The letter — allegedly signed by Trump and featuring a sexually suggestive drawing and a birthday wish that says “may every day be another wonderful secret” — was first published by the newspaper and then shared with members of Congress by the Epstein estate last year.
🔮 Friday night’s order arrived hours after a federal appeals court in the state blocked the administration’s efforts to sequester 20,000 ballots, which another judge warned would “wreak havoc” on elections in the state.
🔮 A federal appeals court has rejected the Trump administration’s latest attempt to stop counting 20,000 ballots in California, an effort that a panel of appeals court judges said could “jeopardize” midterm elections and disenfranchise thousands of eligible voters.
🔮 Donald Trump’s administration is imminently expected to forcibly remove dozens of Afghans from the U.S. to Afghanistan, marking the first large-scale deportation flight of Afghans back into the hands of the Taliban, aid groups and human rights lawyers warn.
🔮 U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes repeatedly erupted at government attorneys during a heated court hearing on Friday before finding that Justice Department officials “intentionally” timed the abrupt removal of hundreds of trees to evade judicial review — and may have been misleading the court about plans that have long been in the works. “The third highest ranking official at the Department of Justice is telling me, telling a federal court, that he cannot say that when the president posted the ‘course will close on November 15,’ what he meant was, ‘the court will close on November 15’?” Reyes asked.
🔮 The president will instead participate in a series of virtual rallies.
🔮 “It will be utilized as a dual-purpose structure: a major national monument that also incorporates military utility to support Homeland defense.”
🔮 Augustin, who is homeless, later said he wanted to get the attention of law enforcement so he could be arrested and sent back to Haiti.
Also by Alex Woodward
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 55 articles by Alex Woodward →

Topics

California Independent The Justice Department the Department of Justice the Justice Department’s

Subjects

California GPE · 4× the Justice Department’s ORG · 4× Becker PERSON · 2× The Justice Department ORG · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× U.S. GPE · 2× Independent ORG · 1× Todd Blanche PERSON · 1× the Department of Justice ORG · 1× the Supreme Court’s ORG · 1×

Narrative

Following reports of door-to-door operations targeting alleged fraud, a spokesperson for Homeland Security Investigations told The Independent that the agency is “committed to protecting the cornerstone of the nation’s democracy” and “committed to restoring integrity to our election systems and ensuring that American citizens and only American citizens are electing American leaders.” The agency “reviews voter records to determine whether the evidence supports a criminal investigation and, where appropriate, refers the matter to the Department of Justice for prosecution,” the person said.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-22
🔮 Log in Attorney General Todd Blanche said won’t rule out having the Department of Justice take action that could block states from certifying election results.

Claims (27 extracted, 8 hedged)

Log in Attorney General Todd Blanche said won’t rule out having the Department of Justice take action that could block states from certifying election results. uncertain
that → log → results
“Yes, of course there’s scenarios we could all come up with, hypothetically — some ‘doomsday’ scenario, for example,” he told reporters Thursday. uncertain
he → ’ → reporters
“I don’t think it’s proper to make any kind of conclusory statements about what could happen in the future.” uncertain
what → think → future
While it’s “never” the Justice Department’s intention to “improperly interfere with elections or the state confirmation process or certification process,” he told reporters, “to say that there’s no circumstances that we would ever do that, of course, I’m not going to say that,” he said. asserted
he → ’ → that
“But am I planning my days around the election to be somewhere to not certify? asserted
I → plan → election
Of course not,” he added. asserted
he → add → ?
His comments follow the Justice Department’s blitz of investigations to find evidence of alleged voter fraud, including door-to-door searches for noncitizen voters and criminal prosecutions and lawsuits in California that could derail ballot counting in the state. uncertain
that → follow → state
The Justice Department also is mulling whether to launch more election-related litigation against states after losing more than two dozen lawsuits over access to voter data and the Supreme Court’s rejection of President Donald Trump’s plan to overhaul mail-in voting. asserted
Department → mull → voting
Government attorneys sued California to force state officials to review whether 18,000 registered voters had fraudulently cast their ballots. asserted
voters → sue → ballots
California is among eight states with an all-mail election, and ballots are sent to registered voters’ households automatically. asserted
ballots → send → households
Trump also votes by mail — he voted by mail twice in 2026 and is expected to cast his ballot for Florida’s general elections this fall. asserted
he → vote → elections
The Justice Department’s role in U.S. elections is strictly limited by law and the Constitution, which ensures that states have the sole authority to administer elections. asserted
states → limit → elections
“We’ve seen this from administration officials in the past where they refuse to rule out clearly unconstitutional and illegal things,” according to David Becker, executive director and founder of the nonpartisan and nonprofit Center for Election and Innovation Research. uncertain
they → see → Research
Though the Justice Department has “no authority” over the certification process, and courts would likely block the federal government from doing so, the Trump administration appears to be signaling that it could try to intervene, Becker told reporters Thursday. uncertain
Becker → have → reporters
“It’s not responsible for them to do that,” he said. asserted
he → ’ → that
The Justice Department’s attempts to interfere would be merely “performative,” knowing full well that “they don’t have the power,” Becker added. asserted
Becker → interfere → power
“The more social media and press that the DOJ does, and less that they’re litigating successfully in court, tells [us] that they’re using it as a political propaganda arm,” he said. asserted
he → do → arm
On Wednesday, a federal judge in California blocked the Department of Homeland Security from carrying out field operations intended to uncover voter fraud in nine states as part of the Trump administration’s “Unlawful Voter Initiative,” which ties the president’s anti-immigration campaign to “election integrity.” asserted
which → block → integrity
The ruling from District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguin blocks federal agents carrying out field interviews that “involve or are likely to involve persons” who agents “know, suspect, or should reasonably know or suspect are U.S. citizens.” asserted
agents → block → who
The administration's surge of officers is likely to intimidate or suppress voter participation and registration, with just days left before Election Day. asserted
days → intimidate → Day
The fears of voting rights groups who filed the lawsuit as well as the “public’s interest in safe elections, free from interference or intimidation, far exceed defendants’ purported interest in combating unlawful voting by non-U.S. citizens,” Martínez-Olguin wrote. asserted
Olguin → file → citizens
Homeland Security “surveils, covertly infiltrates and interrogates the staff of nonprofits and churches conducting voter engagement” and had targeted nearly 150 such nonprofit groups as of July, according to court filings. uncertain
Security → surveil → filings
Internal documents introduced in the case revealed that agents were directed to focus on California, Connecticut, Georgia, Missouri, Nevada, New York, Pennsylvania, Washington and Wisconsin. asserted
agents → introduce → California
Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s criminal investigation arm has also been tasked with trying to “dismantle illicit facilitation networks” accused of registering noncitizens to vote, according to internal documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by legal advocacy group Democracy Forward and shared with The Independent. uncertain
arm → task → Independent
Documents show that ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations division obtained more than 48 million records from Heather Honey, a right-wing election activist who supported Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election. asserted
who → show → election
She now serves as a deputy assistant secretary for election integrity at Homeland Security. asserted
She → serve → Security
Following reports of door-to-door operations targeting alleged fraud, a spokesperson for Homeland Security Investigations told The Independent that the agency is “committed to protecting the cornerstone of the nation’s democracy” and “committed to restoring integrity to our election systems and ensuring that American citizens and only American citizens are electing American leaders.” The agency “reviews voter records to determine whether the evidence supports a criminal investigation and, where appropriate, refers the matter to the Department of Justice for prosecution,” the person said. asserted
person → follow → prosecution
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support