Lucy Letby’s lawyer insists case has not been undermined after experts quit

Read the original at Evening Standard ↗
Cite

Coates, J. (2026, September 15). Lucy Letby’s lawyer insists case has not been undermined after experts quit. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/lucy-letby-ccrc-bbc-newsnight-press-association-b1297002.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Evening Standard · collected 2026-09-15 · by Jessica Coates

Quick Summary

Lucy Letby’s lawyer asserts that her case remains strong despite two experts quitting her defense team, citing unresolved issues with some legal arguments. The former nurse is serving multiple life sentences for killing seven infants and attempting to murder seven others at the Countess of Chester hospital. Engineering expert Helen Shannon and bioengineering professor Geoff Chase withdrew from representing Letby’s case after expressing concerns about certain scientifically unsupported claims made by her defense team, but they still maintain that their previous report on two specific cases remains valid.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Lucy Letby's barrister, Mark McDonald, faces criticism from two former defense experts who withdrew support due to concerns about scientific credibility and "unresolvable problems" in his strategy. Helen Shannon and Geoff Chase warned that McDonald’s approach is risking Letby's long-term interests and potentially harming the families of the affected babies. The public inquiry led by Lady Justice Thirlwall is set to publish its findings, assessing how Letby was able to harm multiple infants while working at the Countess of Chester Hospital. Despite experts' withdrawal, McDonald insists his case remains strong, with one expert group still backing Letby's innocence before the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).

Written for “Lucy Letby Public Inquiry” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Lucy Letby Public Inquiry
Crime & Law · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
Hedges 3 of 37 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Lucy Letby's case and do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 39 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A focuses on Lucy Letby's legal case and her lawyer's response to experts quitting her defense team. Article B discusses a public inquiry criticizing the wider NHS system in relation to Letby's case, not just one specific incident.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 2 of 27 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles cover different aspects of Lucy Letby's case: one focuses on her lawyer's response to experts quitting her defense team, while the other discusses a past email exchange between Letby and her 'boyfriend'.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
15
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
1 of 15 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
65/100
Evening Standard's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Evening Standard · 7906 article(s) · 65 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 65 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jessica Coates
18 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 King Kenny betraying Maya Jama was a ‘high risk’ Celebrity Traitors move “I felt like it was very obvious who the Traitors were in that room and, if I was sticking up for Maya, I would have looked very suspicious,” he said.
🔮 King Kenny says turning on Maya Jama was a ‘high risk’ Celebrity Traitors move Speaking after his elimination, Kenny said the decision to betray the Love Island presenter Jama was “so difficult”. “I really wanted me and her to be in the final, and then we would have taken the win, but I had to do a high risk, high reward move, taking her out,” the former boxer said.
🔮 “We now need the Foreign Secretary to take the decisions that will bring them home.”
🔮 “We now need the Foreign Secretary to take the decisions that will bring them home.”
🔮 “We now need the Foreign Secretary to take the decisions that will bring them home.”
🔮 Jackdaw gas field approval will strengthen UK energy security, Burnham says The decision drew criticism from some Labour backbenchers and environmentalists, while Conservatives called on the Government to also approve the Rosebank oil field, west of Shetland in Scotland’s north. Writing in The Guardian, Mr Burnham said: “There has been much speculation about what this announcement means for Britain’s commitment to addressing the climate crisis.
🔮 In September, William called for suicide prevention to be part of the sporting world’s “game plan” as he urged clubs, competitors and fans to help “save lives”.
🔮 The singer added Johnson would “flop” on her couch and overshare while she occasionally responded, “Damn, that’s crazy”.
🔮 An extraordinary gentleman whose remarkable life will never be forgotten.”
🔮 It’s not my place to purposefully put her in the spotlight unwillingly.”
Also by Jessica Coates
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 18 articles by Jessica Coates →

Topics

CCRC The Criminal Cases Review Commission The Guardian

Subjects

CCRC ORG · 4× Letby PERSON · 4× Geoff Chase PERSON · 1× Helen Shannon PERSON · 1× Lucy Letby PERSON · 1× Lucy Letby’s PERSON · 1× The Criminal Cases Review Commission ORG · 1× The Guardian ORG · 1×

Narrative

The letter added: “Whilst it is entirely legitimate for the defence to advance multiple arguments, some of the other arguments now being put forward we cannot support as scientifically credible and which have, in our view, fundamental unresolvable problems.” Letby was denied permission to appeal against her convictions in 2024. The findings of a public inquiry into how she was able to repeatedly kill and harm babies on the hospital’s neonatal unit are due to be published on Tuesday.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 So how on earth could they make that conclusion?” he said.
2026-09-15 · Evening Standard
Lucy Letby’s lawyer insists case has not been undermined after experts quit · assertive framing

Claims (15 extracted, 1 hedged)

Lucy Letby’s lawyer has insisted her case has not been undermined after two experts quit her defence team, saying some of its arguments have “unresolvable problems”. asserted
some → insist → problems
The former nurse, who maintains her innocence, is serving 15 whole-life terms for the murders of seven babies and the attempted murders of seven others while working on the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester hospital. asserted
who → maintain → hospital
Engineering expert Helen Shannon and bioengineering professor Geoff Chase withdrew from the team on Monday. asserted
Shannon → withdraw → Monday
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which investigates potential miscarriages of justice, is considering evidence presented on her behalf by an international panel of medics. asserted
which → investigate → medics
Read More The group argued the babies died or collapsed as a result of poor medical care and natural causes. asserted
babies → read → care
“They don’t know what I put into the CCRC because I haven’t told them. asserted
I → know → them
So how on earth could they make that conclusion?” he said. uncertain
he → make → conclusion
“But really, it comes back to this. asserted
it → come → this
Both sets of experts say that Lucy Letby is innocent. asserted
Letby → say → experts
“One set of experts remains in the CCRC. asserted
set → remain → CCRC
One set of experts have withdrawn. asserted
set → withdraw → experts
But they both are of the same position that whatever happened at the trial, what took place at the trial, was wrong, that the jury was misled.” asserted
jury → happen → trial
In a letter to the CCRC and reported by The Guardian, the two experts raised concerns about legal arguments put forward by Letby’s team, adding that it was “placing the long-term interests of Ms Letby at serious, unnecessary and unacceptable risk”. asserted
it → report → risk
The pair continued to back their report on Letby’s convictions for attempting to murder two babies with insulin, maintaining it was “very unlikely” they had been poisoned. asserted
they → continue → insulin
The letter added: “Whilst it is entirely legitimate for the defence to advance multiple arguments, some of the other arguments now being put forward we cannot support as scientifically credible and which have, in our view, fundamental unresolvable problems.” Letby was denied permission to appeal against her convictions in 2024. The findings of a public inquiry into how she was able to repeatedly kill and harm babies on the hospital’s neonatal unit are due to be published on Tuesday. asserted
she → add → Tuesday
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support