Photo via Dawn

ATC warns Imaan, husband of verdict sans testimony

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

Asad, M. (2026, October 25). ATC warns Imaan, husband of verdict sans testimony. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2039589/atc-warns-imaan-husband-of-verdict-sans-testimony

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-10-25 · by Malik Asad

Quick Summary

An anti-terrorism court (ATC) warned human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Hazir-Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha that a verdict could be issued without their testimony if they continue to refuse to record statements under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The couple is facing charges related to disrupting an international cricket team’s security route in 2024. During Saturday's hearing at Adiala jail, both accused declined to record their statements as directed by ATC Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra. The judge adjourned the case until Monday, October 26, directing the couple to respond then. The defense has requested a delay in the verdict pending an Islamabad High Court ruling on a transfer plea.
Written by AI on 2026-10-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 25, 2026, an Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) in Islamabad warned human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Hazir-Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha that a verdict could be issued without their testimony if they continued to refuse recording statements under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The couple is accused in a security breach case and declined to record their statements during Saturday's hearing at Adiala jail. Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra directed them to respond at the next hearing scheduled for Monday, October 26. Their defense team sought a delay in the verdict pending an Islamabad High Court (IHC) ruling on a transfer plea.

Written for “Imaan Verdict Proceedings” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Imaan Verdict Proceedings
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 43 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles describe different stages of legal proceedings for the same case, but they do not report on the exact same incident at the same time.”
Dawn
Hedges 2 of 35 claims Outlet record 72/100
“While both articles discuss Imaan and Hadi's security breach case at Adiala Jail, Article A covers a warning by an ATC judge about a potential verdict without their testimony on October 25th, while Article B describes them recording their statements under Section 342 of CrPC and concludes the case with final arguments by state counsel on October 28th.”
Dawn
Hedges 0 of 21 claims Outlet record 72/100
“Article A describes a warning given to Imaan and Hadi by an ATC judge on October 25th, while Article B reports their sentencing in a security breach case on October 29th.”
Dawn
Hedges 3 of 31 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles describe different stages of the legal process involving Imaan and Hadi; Article A discusses the cancellation of a state counsel's appointment, while Article B reports on the court warning the couple to record their statements or face a verdict without testimony.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles are about Imaan Mazari and her husband's legal situation, Article A describes their refusal to record statements before an ATC judge on October 25th, while Article B reports the verdict of a 10-year prison sentence for terrorism-related charges announced on October 29th.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
18
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
1 of 18 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
72/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 2585 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Malik Asad
44 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The judgement clarified that although police could maintain internal records of criminal cases for official purposes, such information could not be disclosed in character certificates issued to citizens, particularly when these were required for travelling abroad.
🔮 Following the completion of the trial and final arguments, the court reserved its verdict and said that it would be pronounced on Oct 29.
🔮 “But we surrender ourselves before the ultimate court where we all must return one day, where all will be held accountable for what they have done.”
🔮 He will preside over a single bench at the Rawalpindi registry.
🔮 While offering yet another opportunity to human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Hazir-Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to record their statements in a security breach case, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Saturday warned them that a verdict could come even without their testimony if they refused.
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · ATC warns Imaan, husband of verdict sans testimony
🔮 Meanwhile, no prosecution witness could be cross-examined during Thursday’s hearing amid the dispute over the state counsel’s appointment.
🔮 Justice Malik remarked with a smile, “In that case, you might as well remove our badges too, as we are also currently serving as additional judges.”
🔮 Describing the charge as the foundation of a trial, Azad maintained that any defect in its framing would undermine the legality of the subsequent proceedings.
🔮 He warned that they could face imprisonment if it was not presented before the court.
🔮 On the application filed by the defence, he said, “I have received your applications; I will issue an order regarding this.
Also by Malik Asad
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 44 articles by Malik Asad →

Topics

ATC Adiala IHC ISLAMABAD Section 342

Subjects

IHC ORG · 3× ATC ORG · 2× Mazari PERSON · 2× Adiala GPE · 1× Chattha PERSON · 1× Hadi PERSON · 1× Hadi Ali Chattha PERSON · 1× ISLAMABAD GPE · 1× Imaan Zainab Hazir-Mazari PERSON · 1× Tahir Abbas Sipra PERSON · 1×

Narrative

ATC Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra, who conducted the proceedings at Adiala jail, issued the warning after both accused declined to record their statements under Section 342 (power to examine the accused) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) during Saturday’s hearing.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-25
🔮 While offering yet another opportunity to human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Hazir-Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to record their statements in a security breach case, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Saturday warned them that a verdict could come even without their testimony if they refused.
2026-10-25 · Dawn
ATC warns Imaan, husband of verdict sans testimony · assertive framing

Claims (18 extracted, 1 hedged)

• Couple refuses to record statements under Section 342 of CrPC; judge directs them to respond at next hearing on Monday • asserted
judge → refuse → Monday
Defence seeks delay in verdict pending IHC ruling on transfer plea ISLAMABAD asserted
Defence → seek → plea
While offering yet another opportunity to human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Hazir-Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to record their statements in a security breach case, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Saturday warned them that a verdict could come even without their testimony if they refused. uncertain
they → offer → testimony
ATC Judge Tahir Abbas Sipra, who conducted the proceedings at Adiala jail, issued the warning after both accused declined to record their statements under Section 342 (power to examine the accused) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) during Saturday’s hearing. asserted
accused → conduct → hearing
The judge directed the couple to record their statements at the next hearing and adjourned the case until Monday, Oct 26. asserted
judge → direct → Monday
During Saturday’s proceedings, Hadi requested the court, “Let the state counsel record the statement under Section 342 on our behalf.” asserted
Hadi → request → behalf
However, the judge replied that recording statements under Section 342 was a matter between the court and the accused, adding that they would have to respond themselves. asserted
they → reply → court
“We will not record the statement under Section 342,” Ms Mazari stated. asserted
Mazari → record → Section
The judge warned that if the accused did not comply, the court would mention in its order that no response had been submitted. asserted
response → warn → order
Ms Mazari and Mr Chattha are facing a jail trial in a 2024 case pertaining to the alleged disruption of an international cricket team’s security route and incitement to public unrest. asserted
Mazari → face → unrest
The couple, accused of removing barriers from the route, was indicted on Oct 7. asserted
couple → accuse → Oct
At the last hearing, a state-appointed counsel had cross-examined all prosecution witnesses. asserted
cross → appoint → witnesses
The court appointed Atif Mehmood as the state counsel to cross-examine the prosecution witnesses, replacing Taimoor Janjua, who was dismissed from the case over his past conduct. asserted
who → appoint → conduct
The court had ruled to appoint the state attorney after the defence counsel failed to cross-examine the prosecution witnesses. asserted
counsel → rule → witnesses
Separately, the defence filed an application requesting the trial court to refrain from delivering a final judgement until the Islamabad High Court decided a petition seeking the transfer of the case to another court. asserted
Court → file → court
The application stated that the transfer petition was already pending before the IHC and requested that this development be made part of the trial court’s judicial record. asserted
development → state → record
The defence also pointed out that the appointment of the state counsel had been challenged before the IHC. asserted
appointment → point → IHC
The application urged the trial court to defer its final decision until the high court ruled on the transfer petition. asserted
court → urge → petition
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support