Who Are You? (Lawyers, Active and Otherwise, and Law Students)

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, September 15). Who Are You? (Lawyers, Active and Otherwise, and Law Students). Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/15/who-are-you-lawyers-active-and-otherwise-and-law-students/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-15 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

The Volokh Conspiracy blog invites readers who are lawyers, former lawyers, or law students to share information about themselves in the comments section. Those who are not in these categories are directed to a separate post for their contributions. The request is open-ended and does not specify what kind of information should be shared beyond asking participants to provide "a few things" about themselves.
Written by AI on 2026-09-16, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Eugene Volokh, a law professor and author at Reason Magazine, invited readers of his blog The Volokh Conspiracy to share information about themselves if they are lawyers, former lawyers, or law students. Those not fitting these criteria were directed to a separate post for comments. The purpose seems to foster discussion within the legal community and beyond.

Written for “Legal Profession Identity Crisis” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Legal Profession Identity Crisis
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss completely unrelated topics and have different titles and excerpts.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
2
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 2 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1127 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
192 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 In May 2025, Harvard revoked Plaintiff's tenure and terminated her appointment with HBS.
🔮 The requirement would hold DSPs liable for their failure to adhere to state-set publication standards, not only "treat[ing] [them] as … publisher[s] or speaker[s]," but treating them as publishers subject to sweeping state controls.
🔮 From Sanchez v. Almond, decided Wednesday by Judge John McConnell (D.R.I.): Mr. Sanchez began working at the office of Rhode Island Governor Daniel J. McKee in May 2021 as a "constituent services" staffer.
🔮 Beauchamp believed that the post appeared to condone murder based on the victim's political viewpoints and statements and became concerned that this post and perception would reflect on GCAO in the public's eyes and thereby undermine the public's trust in GCAO's official duty to prosecute homicides without bias and without regard to a victim's views, statements, or affiliations.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Firing for "Rot in Hell Charlie Kirk" Post Upheld
🔮 After Judge Covington announced that she would be denying McClain's suppression motion, Outlaw stood up and said "the judge is a cocksucker" loud enough for Judge Covington to hear.
🔮 According to the Complaint, in August 2024, Plaintiffs and other District community members learned that then-member of the Board of School Directors of Souderton Area School District (the "Board") William Formica posted lewd comments on social media about Vice President Kamala Harris, disparaging teachers and non-English speakers, and deriding diversity programs.
🔮 Some excerpts from the long First Superseding Indictment in U.S. v. Hakim (E.D. Mich.), filed Oct. 21, alleging conspiracy to transmit threats in interstate commerce as well as, for two defendants, witness intimidation and destruction of property to prevent seizure (8 of the 12 defendants had originally been indicted in May); the targets included UM officials and businesses connected with them, as well as the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit:
🔮 Because "[t]he costs and efforts required to defend a lawsuit through [discovery] could chill free speech nearly as effectively as the absence of the actual malice standard altogether[,]" a public figure plaintiff must plausibly allege actual malice at the outset of the litigation.
🔮 The First Amendment forbids a State from using its investigative power that way, and I will not allow it while this case is pending.
🔮 The same logic could apply to nuns who had felt religious pressure to do the educational or nursing work that their order was known for, or to monks who had felt religious pressure to do agricultural work that supports the monastery.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Amicus Brief in OneTaste Criminal Prosecution
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-11-03 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 192 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

No topics tagged.

Subjects

No subjects extracted.

Narrative

If you're a lawyer, active or otherwise, or a law student, tell us a few things about yourself in the comments.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
2026-09-16 · Reason
Who Are You? (Lawyers, Active and Otherwise, and Law Students) · assertive framing

Claims (2 extracted, 0 hedged)

If you're a lawyer, active or otherwise, or a law student, tell us a few things about yourself in the comments. asserted
you → tell → comments
If you are not a lawyer, please do the same but in the separate post for you right next to this one. asserted
you → do → one
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support