$175K Settlement in Suit Over Requiring Fifth-Graders to Read Pro-Gender-Ideology Books to Kindergarten Students (with No Opt Out)

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, September 15). $175K Settlement in Suit Over Requiring Fifth-Graders to Read Pro-Gender-Ideology Books to Kindergarten Students (with No Opt Out). Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/15/175k-settlement-in-suit-over-requiring-fifth-graders-to-read-pro-gender-ideology-books-to-kindergarten-students-with-no-opt-out/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-15 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

A lawsuit over a California school district’s requirement for fifth-graders to read a pro-gender-ideology book, "My Shadow Is Pink," to kindergarteners settled last year for $175,000. The case involved fifth graders P.D. and S.E., who felt uncomfortable with the content due to religious beliefs opposing such concepts; their parents did not receive prior notice or opt-out options regarding this mandatory school activity.
Written by AI on 2026-09-16, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In 2023, a lawsuit filed by the parents of two fifth-grade boys against a California elementary school resulted in a settlement for $175K. The case stemmed from an incident where kindergarten students were required to read pro-gender-ideology books, such as "My Shadow Is Pink," with fifth-graders who had no opt-out option. Fifth grader P.D. and his family received $40K, while the family of another student, S.E., got $108K; the remaining amount covered legal fees.

The plaintiffs argued that participating in this activity implicitly endorsed messages contrary to their beliefs about gender identity being fixed at birth rather than a matter of choice or change. Judge James Lorenz's order noted that the buddy program, which involves weekly class pairings between younger and older students, is mandatory and previously included activities like art projects with books chosen by the children themselves. However, for this specific incident, teachers chose the book without prior notice to parents.

Written for “School Gender Ideology Lawsuit Settle…” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 School Gender Ideology Lawsuit Settle…
Education · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
52
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
5 of 52 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Education
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1070 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
186 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 From Sanchez v. Almond, decided Wednesday by Judge John McConnell (D.R.I.): Mr. Sanchez began working at the office of Rhode Island Governor Daniel J. McKee in May 2021 as a "constituent services" staffer.
🔮 Beauchamp believed that the post appeared to condone murder based on the victim's political viewpoints and statements and became concerned that this post and perception would reflect on GCAO in the public's eyes and thereby undermine the public's trust in GCAO's official duty to prosecute homicides without bias and without regard to a victim's views, statements, or affiliations.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Firing for "Rot in Hell Charlie Kirk" Post Upheld
🔮 Some excerpts from the long First Superseding Indictment in U.S. v. Hakim (E.D. Mich.), filed Oct. 21, alleging conspiracy to transmit threats in interstate commerce as well as, for two defendants, witness intimidation and destruction of property to prevent seizure (8 of the 12 defendants had originally been indicted in May); the targets included UM officials and businesses connected with them, as well as the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit:
🔮 Because "[t]he costs and efforts required to defend a lawsuit through [discovery] could chill free speech nearly as effectively as the absence of the actual malice standard altogether[,]" a public figure plaintiff must plausibly allege actual malice at the outset of the litigation.
🔮 The First Amendment forbids a State from using its investigative power that way, and I will not allow it while this case is pending.
🔮 The same logic could apply to nuns who had felt religious pressure to do the educational or nursing work that their order was known for, or to monks who had felt religious pressure to do agricultural work that supports the monastery.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Amicus Brief in OneTaste Criminal Prosecution
🔮 Before doing so, "he entered the coffee shop to purchase a cookie, which he hoped would be seen as a sign of goodwill."
🔮 While individuals who are the subjects of unwanted speech may be able to limit some speech directed to them, they cannot limit offensive speech about them directed to others.
🔮 Because "the conduct regulated depend[ed] on—and [could not] be separated from—the ideas communicated," Florida's law was "functionally a regulation of speech" implicating the First Amendment.
🔮 You might assume that some judge is "woke" or "Trumpy" or what have you, but there's a pretty good chance that the judge's legal analysis is still correct.
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-11-02 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 186 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

P.D. P.D. and S.E.'s S.D. Cal S.E. S.E. v. Grey

Subjects

P.D. PERSON · 3× S.E. PERSON · 2× James Lorenz PERSON · 1× P.D. and S.E.'s ORG · 1× S.D. Cal GPE · 1× S.E. v. Grey ORG · 1×

Narrative

In light of P.D.'s role in the class as his buddy's mentor, P.D.'s presence next to his buddy during the read-along video presentation and subsequent tracing of his buddy's shadow in the buddy's chosen color implicitly conveyed P.D.'s endorsement of the message that gender can be a matter of one's choice and subject to change—a message contrary to P.D.'s own beliefs and which he did not wish to convey to his buddy.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-16
🔮 Furthermore, the teachers suggested that similar buddy activities would be provided in the future without notice and an opportunity to opt out.

Claims (52 extracted, 5 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent This case, which I blogged about last year, just settled yesterday for $175K ($108K to S.E. and his family, $40K to P.D. and his family, and $27K to the lawyers). asserted
I → blogge → lawyers
Here's my post from last year about the preliminary injunction in the case (which has now been vacated as part of the settlement): asserted
which → vacate → settlement
[* * *] From Judge James Lorenz's order yesterday in S.E. v. Grey (S.D. Cal.): The school activity at issue occurred in the context of the buddy program, a weekly class pairing younger and older students. asserted
activity → occur → students
P.D. and S.E., both fifth graders, were each paired with a kindergartener. asserted
P.D. → pair → kindergartener
In this program, "students in the older classroom mentor students in the younger classroom." asserted
students → mentor → classroom
Until the buddy class at issue, the buddy program involved art or garden projects, and any books read in the class were selected by the students. asserted
books → involve → students
The school sent parents a weekly newsletter listing the books the students were reading each week. asserted
students → send → books
For the buddy class at issue, the book entitled My Shadow Is Pink was selected by the teachers and was not listed in the weekly newsletter. asserted
Shadow → entitle → newsletter
My Shadow Is Pink is about a boy who liked to wear dresses and play with toys associated with girls. asserted
who → like → girls
Because the boy thought he did not "fit in" with his family and peers, his shadow was pink rather than blue. asserted
shadow → think → family
The story involves a conflict between the boy and his father. asserted
story → involve → boy
The father eventually comes to accept his son's "pink shadow" not as a phase but as reflecting the boy's "inner-most self." asserted
father → come → self
Although the term "gender identity" does not appear in the book, the author describes it as a children's book on the subject of gender identity. asserted
author → appear → identity
Defendants admit that the book "does address gender identity." asserted
book → admit → identity
In preparation for the buddy class, the teacher first read the book to P.D. and S.E.'s fifth grade class. asserted
teacher → read → class
The fifth graders then joined their kindergarten buddies, and the teacher showed a read-along video of the book to the fifth graders sitting next to their respective buddies. asserted
teacher → join → buddies
The video was followed by an "art activity" in which the teacher asked the kindergarteners to "pick a color that represents you," and instructed the fifth graders to trace their respective buddies' shadows on the ground with colored chalk. asserted
that → follow → chalk
Although the class did not involve an explicit discussion of gender identity, the fact that the book addressed this issue was not lost on the students. asserted
book → involve → students
S.E. described the book as "about LGBTQ." asserted
S.E. → describe → LGBTQ
P.D. described it as "about a boy who wanted to change his gender to be a girl. asserted
who → describe → gender
Because choosing one's own gender identity is contrary to Plaintiffs' religious beliefs, they were uncomfortable with the buddy class. asserted
they → choose → class
Moreover, as mentors, P.D. and S.E. did not wish to affirm the book's message to their buddies. asserted
P.D. → wish → buddies
When S.E. and P.D. told their parents about the class, the parents inquired with Defendants why they did not receive notice and an opportunity to opt out, as they did when gender identity was covered in health instruction…. asserted
identity → tell → instruction
California Education Code Section 51240 … provides in pertinent part: If any part of a school's instruction in health conflicts with the religious training and beliefs of a parent or guardian of a pupil, the pupil, upon written request of the parent or guardian, shall be excused from the part of the instruction that conflicts with the religious training and beliefs. … asserted
that → provide → training
Defendants responded that Plaintiffs had no right to opt out because the buddy class was not part of a "health unit." asserted
class → respond → unit
Furthermore, the teachers suggested that similar buddy activities would be provided in the future without notice and an opportunity to opt out. uncertain
activities → suggest → .
S.E.'s and P.D.'s parents sued on their children's behalf. asserted
parents → sue → behalf
The court held that the program, which was "a mandatory part of the curriculum," likely violated the First Amendment rights of students who didn't want to participate: asserted
who → hold → students
The buddy program differs from regular classroom instruction in that the fifth graders mentor their kindergarten buddies. asserted
graders → differ → buddies
In addition, My Shadow Is Pink buddy class required fifth graders to trace their buddy's shadow on the ground in the buddy's chosen color. asserted
class → require → color
P.D.'s tracing of his buddy's shadow on the ground was an expressive act protected by the First Amendment…. asserted
tracing → protect → Amendment
In light of P.D.'s role in the class as his buddy's mentor, P.D.'s presence next to his buddy during the read-along video presentation and subsequent tracing of his buddy's shadow in the buddy's chosen color implicitly conveyed P.D.'s endorsement of the message that gender can be a matter of one's choice and subject to change—a message contrary to P.D.'s own beliefs and which he did not wish to convey to his buddy. asserted
he → read → buddy
P.D.'s required participation in the buddy class therefore directly and immediately affected P.D.'s freedom of speech. asserted
participation → require → speech
"Mandating speech that a speaker would not otherwise make necessarily alters the content of the speech." asserted
speaker → mandate → speech
Laws and regulations which alter content of speech in this manner are content based…. asserted
which → alter → manner
"Content-based regulations are 'presumptively unconstitutional and may be justified only if the government proves that they are narrowly tailored to serve compelling state interests.' uncertain
they → base → interests
" California Education Code [sections] regarding instructional materials and social sciences instruction … require schools to include the study of the role played and contributions made to California and national development by members of historically marginalized groups, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender groups. asserted
sections → regard → groups
California law also prohibits excluding educational materials due to covering the marginalized groups, mandates that these groups be accurately reflected in educational materials, and prohibits their adverse portrayal. asserted
groups → prohibit → portrayal
Defendants argue that My Shadow Is Pink conformed to these requirements. asserted
Shadow → argue → requirements
Its inclusion in the buddy program was intended to stress the acceptance of those who are different and reduce the serious effects of discrimination against gender-diverse individuals. asserted
who → intend → individuals
…and 12 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support