Photo via ABC News (US)

Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit

Read the original at ABC News (US) ↗
Cite

Mallin, A. (2026, October 27). Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit. ABC News (US). https://abcnews.com/Politics/judge-appears-skeptical-dojs-legal-maneuvering-alaska-lawsuit/story?id=137590192

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

ABC News (US) · collected 2026-10-27 · by Alexander Mallin

Quick Summary

District Judge Sharon Gleason expressed skepticism about the Justice Department's last-minute lawsuit attempting to block certification of Alaska’s Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan narrowly loses. The judge highlighted that the DOJ initiated legal action on October 22, 2026, weeks after voting began and nearly four months after the Alaska Supreme Court included Sullivan on the ballot. Republicans claim another candidate with a similar name is causing voter confusion to draw votes away from Sullivan.
Written by AI on 2026-10-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 23, 2026, the Trump administration filed a lawsuit with the Justice Department aiming to block Alaska's Senate election certification if incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan loses. The suit argues that another candidate named Daniel J. Sullivan could confuse voters and potentially alter the election results. Judge Sharon Gleason appeared skeptical of these claims on October 27, noting the last-minute nature of DOJ’s actions. Opponents argue that sharing a name is insufficient grounds for disqualification in Alaska's ranked-choice voting system, which allows voters to distinguish between candidates more easily. The Department of Justice now faces significant legal hurdles as they attempt to convince federal courts that voter confusion over similar names justifies delaying the certification process.

Written for “DOJ Lawsuit Blocks Alaska Senate Race Certification” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 19 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 DOJ Lawsuit Blocks Alaska Senate Race Certification
Politics · 20 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
TIME
Hedges 8 of 57 claims Outlet record 59/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A describes the filing of a federal lawsuit by the Trump Justice Department, while Article B reports on Judge Sharon Gleason's skepticism regarding the lawsuit after it has been filed.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 65/100
BBC News
Hedges 6 of 19 claims Outlet record 68/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 16 of 66 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes the filing of a lawsuit by the DOJ, while Article B reports on a judge's reaction to and skepticism about this lawsuit.”
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses a judge's skepticism of DOJ's legal strategy in a lawsuit related to Alaska's Senate race certification. Article B reports on DOJ issuing subpoenas regarding an alleged collaboration by Peltola’s campaign to recruit another candidate with the same name as Dan Sullivan. These are different specific events.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles describe different aspects of a legal dispute regarding the Alaska Senate race, with Article A focusing on a judge's skepticism towards DOJ's maneuvering and Article B reporting on new subpoenas sought by the Justice Department.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses the judge's skepticism of DOJ's legal maneuvering in a lawsuit to block certification of Alaska's Senate race, while Article B addresses the DOJ’s claims about preserving ballots and conducting investigations into voter confusion. These are related but distinct events.”
CBS News
Hedges 1 of 8 claims Outlet record 65/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
10
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 10 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
ABC News (US)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
20
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (US) · 1331 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alexander Mallin
23 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 We will not be intimidated by a sham investigation."
🔮 Judge says court will investigate government officials in DC golf course case The judge wants to know if lawyers tried to mislead her over Trump's plans.
🔮 Attorneys for former FBI Director James Comey are set to appear in court in Washington, D.C., Friday in their emergency push to have a federal judge dismiss the criminal allegations lodged against him by the Justice Department that accuse him of allegedly mishandling classified information more than a decade ago.
🔮 A House Democrat is asking congressional appropriators for guardrails that would prevent President Donald Trump from exploiting a loophole in federal law to buy the East Potomac Golf Course that he's been pushing to renovate with taxpyer funds.
🔮 "Never before in American history has the federal government, on the eve of an election, sought to coerce a state and local government to abandon their own Constitutional elections procedures and bend to the will of the Executive Branch," U.S .District Judge David Carter wrote in his Wednesday order.
🔮 Bill Essayli, a controversial Trump-installed leader of the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Central District of California, argued in the hearing that the administration was simply pushing for the state to be in compliance with federal law barring non-citizens from casting votes. But state officials and other legal advocates opposing the DOJ lawsuit countered that the litigation violated longstanding Constitutional principles mandating that states have control over their elections -- and could have chaotic consequences for the state in tabulating final vote counts in the weeks ahead.
🔮 I'm frustrated that I got it in the middle of the night, but I'm much more concerned that it's filed on the public record." The assistant U.S. attorney in the hearing, John Borchert, struggled repeatedly as Faruqui asked him to explain the government's conduct, which the judge said was unlike any case he had ever seen in the history of D.C.'s district court. Faruqui ultimately granted the request from Flores' and Benavides' attorneys to strike the amended complaint from the docket and said he would continue Tuesday's hearing to determine whether prosecutors established probable cause in their initial complaint filed last week. "Why today on this one case have you changed the entire history of how you charge cases?" Faruqui asked of Borchert.
🔮 She could not immediately be reached for comment on Tuesday.
🔮 "The United States seeks a court order to prevent Defendants from certifying the result of the November 2026 United States Senate election if '(1) [Dan S.] Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for [Dan S.] Sullivan and Alaska's rank-choice process played out accordingly, [Dan S.] Sullivan would have won the election.'"
🔮 Appeals court rejects Trump admin's voting lawsuit against California The court sent the suit back to a district court, which will hear it on Tuesday.
Also by Alexander Mallin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 23 articles by Alexander Mallin →

Topics

Alaska Alaskans DOJ Republican Senate

Subjects

Alaska GPE · 4× DOJ ORG · 3× Dan S.] Sullivan PERSON · 3× Alaskans NORP · 2× Dan Sullivan PERSON · 2× Daniel J. Sullivan PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Senate ORG · 2× Sharon Gleason PERSON · 2× United States GPE · 2×

Narrative

"The United States seeks a court order to prevent Defendants from certifying the result of the November 2026 United States Senate election if '(1) [Dan S.] Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for [Dan S.] Sullivan and Alaska's rank-choice process played out accordingly, [Dan S.] Sullivan would have won the election.'"
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-29
🔮 "The United States seeks a court order to prevent Defendants from certifying the result of the November 2026 United States Senate election if '(1) [Dan S.] Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for [Dan S.] Sullivan and Alaska's rank-choice process played out accordingly, [Dan S.] Sullivan would have won the election.'"
2026-10-29 · ABC News (US)
Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit · assertive framing

Claims (10 extracted, 0 hedged)

Judge appears skeptical of DOJ's legal maneuvering in Alaska lawsuit District Judge Sharon Gleason noted the last-minute nature of DOJ's actions. asserted
Gleason → appear → actions
The federal judge handling the Justice Department's bid to block certification of Alaska's Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan narrowly loses signaled considerable skepticism of DOJ's legal strategy on Monday. asserted
Sullivan → handle → Monday
In her first order acknowledging the case, District Judge Sharon Gleason highlighted the last-minute nature of the government's actions, especially as Alaskans have already begun casting their ballots. " asserted
Alaskans → acknowledge → ballots
After Alaskans had already begun casting their ballots for the November 2026 election -- and nearly four months after the Alaska Supreme Court directed the Division of Elections to include Daniel J. Sullivan on the ballot for the upcoming United States Senate election -- the United States initiated this action on October 22, 2026," Gleason said. asserted
Gleason → begin → October
"The United States seeks a court order to prevent Defendants from certifying the result of the November 2026 United States Senate election if '(1) [Dan S.] Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for [Dan S.] Sullivan and Alaska's rank-choice process played out accordingly, [Dan S.] Sullivan would have won the election.'" asserted
Sullivan → seek → election
On Friday, President Donald Trump said that he had directed the Justice Department to preemptively file a lawsuit to try to block the certification of the crucial Alaska Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses, citing name confusion among the candidates. asserted
Sullivan → say → candidates
Republicans have alleged that candidate Dan J. Sullivan is running a sham campaign to purposefully confuse voters and draw votes away from incumbent Sen. Dan S. Sullivan based on their names being similar. asserted
names → allege → Sullivan
The district judge's order came in response to a rapid series of briefings from parties seeking to join the case and dismiss the lawsuit. asserted
order → come → lawsuit
Gleason said in her order on Monday that she intends to issue a ruling on a request for outside parties to join by Wednesday at 5 p.m. local time. asserted
parties → say → p.m.
She has yet to indicate whether she will hold a hearing. asserted
she → have → hearing
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support