Photo via Toronto Star

Justice Department makes a splash with politically sensitive cases and actions during midterm blitz

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Richer, A. D., & Tucker, E. (2026, October 28). Justice Department makes a splash with politically sensitive cases and actions during midterm blitz. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/world/united-states/justice-department-makes-a-splash-with-politically-sensitive-cases-and-actions-during-midterm-blitz/article_29fe0061-7ee4-50ec-b0e5-8ce36f3a8673.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-10-29 · by Alanna Durkin Richer, Eric Tucker

Quick Summary

As midterm elections approach next week, President Donald Trump’s Justice Department has intensified politically sensitive investigations and legal actions that critics argue are timed to influence public perception and support for Republican candidates. Recent activities include searching U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar's home, charging two former FBI officials over Hunter Biden, attempting to prosecute James Comey, and failing in efforts to indict a White House aide who testified about Trump’s actions to overturn the 2020 election results. Critics like David Laufman argue this behavior disregards long-standing norms of avoiding politically sensitive investigations close to an election. The Justice Department maintains these actions follow legal protocols and do not aim to sway elections, highlighting their focus on purpose rather than timing near Election Day.
Written by AI on 2026-10-31, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 28, 2026, the Justice Department under President Donald Trump intensified its politically charged actions ahead of the midterm elections by conducting a search at Rep. Ilhan Omar's home, filing criminal charges against two former FBI officials over Hunter Biden investigations, attempting to prosecute James Comey, and failing to indict a former White House aide who testified about Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Critics argue these moves are politically motivated due to their timing and focus on Trump's critics or issues relevant to Republican supporters. The Justice Department has historically avoided such actions before elections, but this year it has disregarded that precedent, with defense lawyers and Democrats viewing the timing as suspiciously political.

Written for “Justice Department Midterm Blitz” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 113592 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-31

Story

📰 Justice Department Midterm Blitz
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
Hedges 10 of 44 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different aspects related to political investigations and actions but do not report on the same specific incident.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 24 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different legal actions by the Justice Department against separate individuals: one against Ilhan Omar and another against James Comey.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 2 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles mention politically sensitive cases involving the FBI and Hunter Biden, they describe different aspects: Article A focuses on charges against two FBI agents for lying about the Hunter Biden laptop to Congress, while Article B discusses a broader Justice Department strategy including but not limited to the same FBI case.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 4 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A focuses on an FBI agent's testimony regarding a case against former FBI officials, while Article B discusses a broader political context and timing of various politically sensitive cases by the Justice Department.”
ABC News (US)
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A focuses on ex-FBI agents fighting charges related to lying about Hunter Biden's laptop probe, while Article B discusses a broader political context and timing of various politically sensitive cases, including mentioning the same FBI officials' case but not describing it as the main event.”
CBS News
Hedges 3 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to politically sensitive cases, with Article A focusing on a hearing questioning the evidence against ex-FBI officials, while Article B broadly discusses the Justice Department's actions during midterms.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 9 of 53 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss politically sensitive actions by the Justice Department, they describe different aspects of an ongoing series of events rather than the exact same incident.”
The Independent
Hedges 4 of 30 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A describes the Justice Department's actions in general, while Article B focuses on a specific court hearing and legal arguments made by former FBI officials.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 2 of 8 claims
“Article A focuses on specific actions and cases by the Justice Department targeting political opponents during the midterm elections, while Article B discusses a broader campaign strategy involving multiple tactics including but not limited to DOJ actions.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 8 of 27 claims
“While both articles discuss recent politically sensitive actions by the Justice Department ahead of midterms, they describe different specific incidents and charges.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
38
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
3 of 38 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-31 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 10784 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Alanna Durkin Richer
21 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It is among a handful of Senate contests this year expected to determine control of the chamber.
🔮 He said he regarded it as a “huge distraction” from his other work and appreciated that the investigation could be seen as political.
🔮 The Justice Department has historically sought to avoid major action before an election The law enforcement agency has a long-accepted practice of avoiding overt investigative actions against candidates in the weeks before an election, or other public steps that could be perceived as attempting to influence a political outcome.
🔮 Under Oregon law, a minor may possess a shotgun if provided by a parent or by someone else with the parent’s consent.
🔮 Both officials said the death toll was preliminary and could change.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · Several people killed in shooting at US school
🔮 Rodríguez deported Saab to the U.S. in May.
🔮 Emily Covington, a spokesperson for the department, said group boycotts among business competitors might violate U.S. law.
🔮 One judge at the center of the report, Patrick Schiltz, accused the government in January of ignoring roughly 100 court orders, stating in a ruling that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, an agency within DHS, "is not a law unto itself." Schiltz, nominated by Republican President George W. Bush and a former law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, told the newspaper that the situation in Minnesota's federal court last winter "created a grave threat to the rule of law." In a Wednesday statement, Schiltz insisted he was "acting well within the ethical rules that apply to federal judges in speaking to The New York Times." He noted a February advisory opinion from the Committee on Codes of Conduct reaffirming that federal judges may speak or write "on core judiciary matters such as advocacy for the rule of law and judicial independence,'" stating: "That is exactly what I did." The complaint was delivered to the chief judge of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which supervises Minnesota federal courts. The Republican administration frequently attacks what it calls "activist judges" supposedly intent on thwarting Trump’s agenda. Yet some of the most critical and unfavorable court rulings have originated from jurists nominated by Trump and other Republican presidents.
🔮 WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith, who brought two federal indictments against President Donald Trump, will tell lawmakers on Tuesday that he “will not be silenced by continued threats of prosecution” from the Trump administration and that he believes the rule of law is being threatened like never before.
🔮 Justice Department officials are pressing forward despite diGenova’s departure, with a flurry of subpoenas to former law enforcement and intelligence officials expected to yield grand jury testimony in the weeks ahead at the Fort Pierce, Florida, home court of a favored Trump-appointed federal judge.
Also by Alanna Durkin Richer
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 21 articles by Alanna Durkin Richer →
Eric Tucker
29 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Lawyers for former FBI Director James Comey will ask a federal judge on Friday to block the Justice Department from pursuing its third criminal case against the outspoken critic of President Donald Trump and frequent target of Republican outrage.
🔮 He said he regarded it as a “huge distraction” from his other work and appreciated that the investigation could be seen as political.
🔮 A dismissal of the complaint would not prevent the Justice Department from attempting to get a indictment, but that could be a challenge given that grand juries in the nation’s capital have repeatedly refused to approve charges in politically sensitive cases.
🔮 The Justice Department has historically sought to avoid major action before an election The law enforcement agency has a long-accepted practice of avoiding overt investigative actions against candidates in the weeks before an election, or other public steps that could be perceived as attempting to influence a political outcome.
🔮 “Given the substantial public attention devoted to this matter, and the significant questions raised concerning the conduct of federal officials, declining independent review would risk undermining public confidence in the Department’s ability to police its own conduct.
🔮 Witkoff, a key Trump administration envoy who has tried without success to steer Russia and Ukraine toward a settlement to end a war that will hit the five-year mark in February, thanked Putin for releasing Hubbard, telling him, “Because of you, he’s going home to his family.”
🔮 Under Oregon law, a minor may possess a shotgun if provided by a parent or by someone else with the parent’s consent.
🔮 Both officials said the death toll was preliminary and could change.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · Several people killed in shooting at US school
🔮 According to an FBI complaint, the thumb-sized device contained a microphone and could connect to a camera.
🔮 The Justice Department inspector general’s office declined to comment on whether it would act on the lawyers’ request.
Also by Eric Tucker
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 29 articles by Eric Tucker →

Topics

Democratic FBI Justice Department Republican the Justice Department

Subjects

the Justice Department ORG · 7× Democratic NORP · 4× Comey PERSON · 3× FBI ORG · 3× Justice Department ORG · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Democrats NORP · 2× Department ORG · 2× Hillary Clinton PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2×

Narrative

This month alone, the Justice Department escalated an investigation into Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar with a search of her home; brought criminal charges against two former FBI officials accused of falsely downplaying their knowledge of investigations involving Hunter Biden; revealed a fresh attempt to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey; and made an unsuccessful attempt to indict a former White House aide who delivered dramatic but disputed testimony about Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The moves are notable not only because of the timing but also because they largely have been directed at outspoken critics of Trump or issues that have animated the Republican’s base.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-31
🔮 The Justice Department has historically sought to avoid major action before an election The law enforcement agency has a long-accepted practice of avoiding overt investigative actions against candidates in the weeks before an election, or other public steps that could be perceived as attempting to influence a political outcome.

Claims (38 extracted, 3 hedged)

A crucial and contentious midterm election arrives next week, and President Donald Trump’s Justice Department has been scrambling with a blitz of headline-making actions and cases that defense lawyers, Democrats and other critics say is no coincidence and reeks of politics — in both the timing and the targets. asserted
lawyers → arrive → timing
This month alone, the Justice Department escalated an investigation into Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar with a search of her home; brought criminal charges against two former FBI officials accused of falsely downplaying their knowledge of investigations involving Hunter Biden; revealed a fresh attempt to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey; and made an unsuccessful attempt to indict a former White House aide who delivered dramatic but disputed testimony about Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The moves are notable not only because of the timing but also because they largely have been directed at outspoken critics of Trump or issues that have animated the Republican’s base. asserted
that → escalate → base
The Justice Department has also employed unusual maneuvers to lock down charges, bypassing grand juries to file what are effectively placeholder cases against Comey and the ex-FBI officials in the heavily Democratic nation’s capital — where prosecutors over the past year have repeatedly struggled to secure indictments. asserted
prosecutors → employ → indictments
“Never in the modern history of the Department of Justice has there ever been such a brazen disregard for time-honored norms and protocols in conceiving of or undertaking politically sensitive investigations,” said David Laufman, who served as a senior Justice Department official across Democratic and Republican administrations and helped oversee the Hillary Clinton email investigation. asserted
who → honor → investigation
The Justice Department, in a statement, said it is “following the facts and the law, not anyone’s political timetable.” asserted
it → say → facts
The Justice Department has historically sought to avoid major action before an election The law enforcement agency has a long-accepted practice of avoiding overt investigative actions against candidates in the weeks before an election, or other public steps that could be perceived as attempting to influence a political outcome. uncertain
that → seek → outcome
It’s such a foundational principle that successive attorneys general have issued departmentwide memos during election cycles reminding employees not to make an investigative move designed to help or hinder any particular candidate. asserted
general → ’ → candidate
Responding to questions about the recent investigative moves, the Justice Department said in a statement that it was an informal practice, not a written rule, to avoid overt actions within 60 days of an election. asserted
it → respond → election
The practice is meant to prohibit prosecutors from choosing the timing of an action to affect an election, the department said. asserted
department → mean → election
Department policy does not require the Department to stop ongoing work during an election season,” the department said. asserted
department → require → season
That practice was famously tested in 2016 when Comey, then the FBI director, told Congress 11 days before Election Day that the bureau was revisiting its investigation into Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified information because of newly discovered emails. asserted
bureau → test → emails
Comey has said he felt he picked the least destructive option available, but his decision-making was harshly criticized by Democrats — and the Justice Department inspector general. asserted
making → say → Democrats
Attorney General Todd Blanche, for his part, has not been shy about his view that the Justice Department does not exist independent of the White House and has insisted he is no different from his predecessors in serving a president. asserted
he → exist → president
He has denied that the department’s investigative decisions are political. asserted
decisions → deny → ?
Yet even before this month, the Justice Department had initiated multiple inquiries into the president’s perceived adversaries. asserted
Department → initiate → adversaries
That includes a Florida-based investigation that Trump allies had hoped would prove a right-wing theory that former law enforcement and intelligence officials who scrutinized the president over the last decade had conspired against him. asserted
who → include → him
That investigation has shown signs of faltering amid a spate of staff turnovers and delays. asserted
investigation → show → turnovers
Investigators in recent weeks have put off scheduled grand jury testimony of multiple witnesses, according to multiple people familiar with the matter who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation. uncertain
who → put → investigation
Among the most politically delicate moves this month came when federal agents searched the home of Omar, one of the most outspoken congressional critics of the president. asserted
agents → come → president
She is on the ballot Tuesday for another term representing Minnesota’s 5th District. asserted
She → represent → District
Federal agents seized Omar’s phone in the search and have issued more than a dozen grand jury subpoenas, including to some of her relatives, as investigators probe issues related to her immigration paperwork. asserted
investigators → seize → paperwork
Blanche has defended the timing of the search, which was approved by a federal judge. asserted
which → defend → judge
He told reporters last week, “I can tell you unequivocally that the decision to seek a search warrant had nothing to do with what’s happening in November.” asserted
what → tell → November
The Justice Department later charged two former FBI officials with making false statements to Congress about their knowledge of a laptop the department says belonged to former President Joe Biden’s son Hunter. asserted
department → charge → son
The case emerged from an investigation that began immediately after a July speech on election security by Trump and was ordered by FBI Director Kash Patel, according to testimony Tuesday from an FBI agent assigned to the probe. uncertain
that → emerge → probe
The Justice Department charged the two former officials by complaint instead of a grand jury indictment — a move the magistrate judge overseeing the case described as unusual. asserted
judge → charge → case
Prosecutors then left the judge dumbfounded when they tried to add another charge by filing a new criminal complaint on the court docket without the required judicial sign-off that probable cause exists. asserted
cause → leave → off
“Everything is a little sideshow on top of a sideshow,” U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui told prosecutors. asserted
Faruqui → tell → prosecutors
On Monday, newly unsealed court papers in a separate case revealed that prosecutors are attempting to bring the third criminal case against Comey since Trump returned to the White House, accusing him of leaking classified information a decade ago. asserted
Trump → unseal → information
With the statute of limitations set to expire earlier this month, prosecutors used an uncommon legal tactic in an attempt to extend the time in which they can seek a grand jury indictment. asserted
they → set → indictment
Comey’s legal team has described it as legally invalid and politically motivated, and is pushing the judge to dismiss it. asserted
team → describe → it
A judge is set to hear arguments Friday. asserted
judge → set → arguments
Asked about the latest case against the former FBI director, Trump said this week that he didn’t know anything about it. asserted
he → ask → it
But the president added, “He’s a dirty cop, James Comey.” asserted
He → add → ?
For his part, Comey seemed unsurprised. asserted
Comey → seem → part
“Well, they’re back — again,” he said in a video statement Monday. asserted
he → ’re → statement
“It would almost be funny if it weren’t such an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice — one that we cannot become numb to. asserted
we → become → that
Nothing’s changed with me; I’m still innocent, I’m still not afraid of these people — and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary.” asserted
I → change → judiciary
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support