The Aporia
Chase, M. (2026, October 29). New York Times ‘didn’t pull their punches’ on second Dan Sullivan allegations: Sarah Bedford. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4784285/new-york-times-mary-peltola-second-dan-sullivan-sarah-bedford/
Chase, Mackenzie. “New York Times ‘didn’t pull their punches’ on second Dan Sullivan allegations: Sarah Bedford.” Washington Examiner, 29 Oct. 2026, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4784285/new-york-times-mary-peltola-second-dan-sullivan-sarah-bedford/.
Chase, Mackenzie. “New York Times ‘didn’t pull their punches’ on second Dan Sullivan allegations: Sarah Bedford.” Washington Examiner, October 29, 2026. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/congressional/4784285/new-york-times-mary-peltola-second-dan-sullivan-sarah-bedford/.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
Mary Peltola's campaign, the Democratic nominee for Alaska's U.S. Senate seat, is accused of orchestrating a secret effort to recruit another candidate named Dan Sullivan to confuse voters in the race against incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan (R-AK), according to reports by The New York Times and other sources. This strategy reportedly involved text messages between Peltola's campaign staff discussing how to place an additional "Dan Sullivan" on the ballot to potentially siphon votes away from the incumbent. Elisa Rios, a former campaign manager for Peltola who was fired in August, is cited as one of the sources alleging this plot. The campaign denies any involvement and claims they were unaware of such efforts. Despite media reports and public concern, many Alaskan voters remain indifferent about the alleged manipulation.