Photo via Washington Examiner

Of course el Sayed is on the side of the terrorists

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Harsanyi, D. (2026, October 30). Of course el Sayed is on the side of the terrorists. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/in_focus/4786034/abdul-el-sayed-side-terrorists/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-10-30 · by David Harsanyi

Quick Summary

President Donald Trump has accused Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul el Sayed of supporting terrorist groups, calling him “on the side of the terrorists.” Major media outlets like The Washington Post have countered that there is no evidence to substantiate this claim. The article argues that while Trump often exaggerates, his accusation targets el Sayed’s alleged support for extremist organizations rather than labeling him as a terrorist himself.
Written by AI on 2026-10-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 25, 2026, President Donald Trump campaigned in eastern Michigan for Republicans a day after former President Barack Obama rallied Democrats, highlighting the state's significance in the upcoming midterm elections. Trump targeted Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, demanding he undergo metal detectors at the U.S. Capitol if elected and labeling him as an extremist with ties to terrorist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood. Despite these claims, El-Sayed has dismissed allegations against his religious background, emphasizing faith's importance in politics. As of October 30, Democrats have started rallying behind El-Sayed amid growing support for the candidate who advocates universal healthcare and progressive policies.

Written for “Trump Attacks El-Sayed Over Faith” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 17 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Attacks El-Sayed Over Faith
Politics · 18 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 25 claims Outlet record 66/100
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 30 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to Abdul El-Sayed, one focusing on his association with a strategist linked to antisemitic views and the other on President Trump's accusation of El-Sayed siding with terrorists.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 65/100
Times of India
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 15 claims Outlet record 59/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 2 of 2 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Abdul el Sayed's political situation, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the same general topic (El-Sayed's religion in the Senate race) but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
NPR
Hedges 3 of 47 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The first article describes Trump's remarks during a specific date, while the second article discusses a broader reaction to Trump's accusation without specifying it as an immediate or concurrent event.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 8 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss Abdul el Sayed and President Trump's accusations, they describe different aspects of the ongoing campaign rhetoric rather than the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Abdul el Sayed's stance on the Muslim Brotherhood and related accusations, rather than reporting on a single specific incident at the same time.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 5 of 32 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the origin and spread of a false claim about Abdul El-Sayed made by Laura Loomer, while Article B focuses on President Trump's accusation against El-Sayed during a campaign period.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
7
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
14%
1 of 7 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
18
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4074 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

David Harsanyi
16 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 No matter how unhinged, malevolent, or un-American a candidate, even moderate Democrats will rationalize their support by contending they are saving the republic from Donald Trump.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · Democrats want to destroy the constitutional order
🔮 President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that the United States will end its $3.8 billion in annual aid to Israel by the end of 2026.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · What will Israel haters whine about now?
🔮 There’s a reason El-Sayed wouldn’t condemn the terrorist Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps when asked by a college student during a Michigan town hall not long ago.
🔮 A number of things could happen.
🔮 Because such a significant percentage of its budget is dedicated to keeping the welfare state operational, any reforms aimed at reducing spending or debt will be greeted with immediate social turmoil.
🔮 The number of available job openings that month would hit an all-time high of 7.6 million.
🔮 Every time Republicans threaten to cut federal jobs, though they rarely follow through, Democrats predict that society will be plunged into chaos and high unemployment.
🔮 The New York Times could not have known all the details at the time, but it immediately downplayed the potential terrorist angle.
2026-10-02 · assertive framing · The New York Times’s 80-year crusade against Israel
🔮 Would he now renounce those who held vigils supporting the mass murderer Ayatollah Ali Khamenei?
🔮 Would he now renounce those who held vigils supporting the mass murderer Ayatollah Ali Khamenei?
Also by David Harsanyi
Democrats want to destroy the constitutional order
2026-11-03 · Washington Examiner
What will Israel haters whine about now?
2026-11-03 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 16 articles by David Harsanyi →

Topics

Democratic Michigan Senate The Washington Post the Muslim Brotherhood

Subjects

el Sayed PERSON · 3× Abdul el Sayed PERSON · 1× Democratic NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Michigan GPE · 1× Senate ORG · 1× The Washington Post ORG · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× the Muslim Brotherhood ORG · 1×

Narrative

President Donald Trump recently accused Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul el Sayed of being “on the side of the terrorists.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-30
2026-10-30 · Washington Examiner
Of course el Sayed is on the side of the terrorists · assertive framing

Claims (7 extracted, 1 hedged)

President Donald Trump recently accused Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul el Sayed of being “on the side of the terrorists.” asserted
Trump → accuse → terrorists
The accusation triggers fits of indignation from the Left. asserted
accusation → trigger → Left
The Washington Post and other major outlets assured voters “there is no evidence” to claim that el Sayed supports groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood. uncertain
Sayed → assure → Brotherhood
Need it be said, the president is prone to lots of hyperbole. asserted
president → need → hyperbole
But Trump didn’t accuse el Sayed of being a terrorist. asserted
Trump → accuse → Sayed
He accused el Sayed of siding with terrorists. asserted
He → accuse → terrorists
I’m not sure how anyone can argue otherwise. asserted
anyone → ’m → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support