Photo via Washington Examiner

Appeals court rejects DOJ effort to set aside 20,000 mail-in ballots, teeing up Supreme Court gambit

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Deese, K. (2026, October 30). Appeals court rejects DOJ effort to set aside 20,000 mail-in ballots, teeing up Supreme Court gambit. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4786513/appeals-court-rejects-doj-mail-in-ballots-supreme-court/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-10-30 · by Kaelan Deese

Quick Summary

A federal appeals court has denied the Justice Department’s request to set aside approximately 20,000 mail-in ballots suspected of being cast by noncitizens in California. This ruling came on Friday with a 2-1 vote, mirroring an earlier decision from Monday. The case could now proceed to the Supreme Court ahead of the midterm elections as the Justice Department considers its next move.
Written by AI on 2026-10-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 26, 2026, federal appellate judges questioned the Justice Department's demand for California to set aside 20,000 mail ballots from people suspected of not being U.S. citizens. The panel expressed doubt about the timing and constitutionality of this request during a rare weekend hearing. Despite initial setbacks, on November 2, Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ordered the Trump administration to stop demanding California officials set aside these ballots, delivering another setback to the DOJ's election oversight efforts. However, in an unusual legal twist, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals briefly lifted and then restored a block on the investigation into noncitizen voting in California hours before polls opened on November 3, setting up further legal battles.

Written for “Appeals Court Rejects DOJ Bid” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 42 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Appeals Court Rejects DOJ Bid
Politics · 43 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads centre and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 20 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 5 of 32 claims Outlet record 65/100
Fox News
Hedges 3 of 14 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 4 claims Outlet record 66/100
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 4 claims Outlet record 67/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 7 of 34 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 5 of 23 claims Outlet record 59/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 31 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 59/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
3
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 3 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Centre
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
43
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4256 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Kaelan Deese
52 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 If prosecutors pursued that theory, they would need to prove an agreement and specific intent to interfere with voting rights, rather than simply an effort to recruit another candidate.
🔮 A federal judge ordered the Trump administration on Monday to stop demanding that California election officials set aside ballots from roughly 20,000 people the Justice Department suspects may be noncitizens, delivering another setback to its election oversight efforts.
🔮 A federal judge grilled former FBI Director James Comey’s attorneys on Friday over whether their effort to dismiss the Justice Department’s latest criminal case could become “a great exercise in futility” if a grand jury returns an indictment alleging more recent conduct.
🔮 Alaska Democratic Senate nominee Mary Peltola’s campaign could face demands for records revealing who financed an effort to recruit a second Dan Sullivan to enter the race as the Justice Department seeks discovery in its Alaska election lawsuit — and now accuses her campaign committee and national Democrats of misleading the court about the operation.
🔮 The campaigns could offer lessons for anti-abortion groups, which have struggled to win statewide abortion votes since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
🔮 U.S. District Judge David Carter, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, rejected the department’s request to require election officials to hold the flagged voters’ ballots until their citizenship could be verified.
🔮 Voters in six states will soon decide whether to impose or expand voter identification requirements, including rules requiring mail voters to provide part of a driver’s license or Social Security number.
🔮 Just hours after issuing what a Trump administration lawyer called an “untenable” command from the bench, a federal judge withdrew her order that would have forced the Department of Justice to refile a court brief with the names of career attorneys who agreed with it, reversing course Monday after a court hearing about golf course renovations stretched beyond six hours.
🔮 The defense argued that the prosecution relies on a novel interpretation of the law and that Van Dyke lacked fair notice that trading on the information could violate federal law.
🔮 His petition arrives as Democrats in Washington are preparing investigations for a possible return to House control in January 2027, while President Donald Trump’s allies are organizing legal defenses for officials who could be called to testify or produce records.
Also by Kaelan Deese
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 52 articles by Kaelan Deese →

Topics

California The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals the Justice Department’s the Supreme Court

Subjects

California GPE · 1× The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ORG · 1× the Justice Department’s ORG · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

A federal appeals court on Friday rejected the Justice Department’s emergency bid to force California to set aside mail-in ballots associated with roughly 20,000 suspected noncitizens, opening a potential path to the Supreme Court days before the midterm elections.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-30

Claims (3 extracted, 0 hedged)

A federal appeals court on Friday rejected the Justice Department’s emergency bid to force California to set aside mail-in ballots associated with roughly 20,000 suspected noncitizens, opening a potential path to the Supreme Court days before the midterm elections. asserted
court → reject → elections
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to deny an injunction requiring officials to separate the flagged ballots and verify voters’ citizenship before counting them. asserted
Court → vote → them
The decision matches the same vote that was handed down in a Monday denial by the same panel. asserted
that → match → panel
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support