Photo via The Independent

Kash Patel’s bizarre Senate hearing went from an argument about bestiality to outright insults

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Baxter, H. (2026, September 15). Kash Patel’s bizarre Senate hearing went from an argument about bestiality to outright insults. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kash-patel-senate-hearing-fbi-bestiality-midterms-b3050718.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-09-15 · by Holly Baxter

Quick Summary

During a Senate hearing, FBI Director Kash Patel faced intense questioning from Senator Dick Durbin regarding the removal of standards that previously disqualified potential FBI recruits who had engaged in bestiality or other criminal activities. The exchange became notably bizarre when Durbin pointed out the absurdity of considering "victims" of bestiality for recruitment, to which Patel awkwardly attempted to clarify by joking about not disqualifying animals themselves. This incident highlighted broader concerns over Patel's controversial actions within the FBI, including purging staff and implementing loyalty tests.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 15, FBI Director Kash Patel testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Democrats criticized Patel for his leadership and use of FBI resources, including travel expenses, while Republicans aimed to highlight his efforts in combating violent crime and drug trafficking. The committee questioned Patel about recent controversies involving firings within the bureau, allegations of excessive drinking, and a revision of hiring policies that considered victims of bestiality. Violent crimes in the U.S. had their largest one-year drop on record, according to recent FBI reports.

Written for “FBI Director Testimony” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 14 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 FBI Director Testimony
Crime & Law · 15 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 1 claims Outlet record 70/100
NBC News
Outlet record 60/100
NBC News
Hedges 0 of 17 claims Outlet record 60/100
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 57 claims Outlet record 67/100
CBS News
Hedges 5 of 32 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 60/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
90
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
6 of 90 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
15
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3431 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Holly Baxter
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Meanwhile, out on the campaign trail, Trump keeps insisting that the midterms will go well if people “pretend he’s on the ballot”.
🔮 Minaj told the crowd that it was an “honor to stand with” Trump, adding: “If you run again, I will support you again.”
🔮 Log in Katie Zacharia was expected to start her job as White House press secretary on Tuesday morning with a bang.
🔮 At a rally in San Antonio on Wednesday night, the president tossed out the usual insults at James Talarico — the man who polls show might be about to become the first Democrat to win statewide in Texas in over 30 years — and then directly threatened the people who might vote for him.
🔮 Today, we opened with a lot of expected bluster about how kids with these basic savings accounts could become “rich by the time they’re 18” if they choose to put money into it and then bet on the stock market, which they could do with literally any other savings account.
🔮 But reports have circulated that she may have accidentally broken a test tube containing plague bacteria, and the hospital where she was treated has been quarantined.
🔮 But reports have circulated that she may have accidentally broken a test tube containing plague bacteria, and the hospital where she was treated has been quarantined.
🔮 Beards were out, “war fighters” were in, AMERICA WAS BACK (to getting itself entrenched into forever wars in the Middle East) and Hegseth got to preen around talking about strength and integrity and all those other things he wouldn’t know if he bumped into them in a dark alley.
🔮 Rumors swirled on Monday morning when the White House announced that President Trump would make a mystery announcement at 2 pm.
🔮 But his training in ethics and his technical knowledge meant that he was able to fairly accurately predict the conversations we would have once they were developed.
Also by Holly Baxter
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Holly Baxter →

Topics

Democratic FBI MAGA Senate The Atlantic

Subjects

Patel PERSON · 14× FBI ORG · 10× Kennedy PERSON · 7× Trump PERSON · 2× Democratic NORP · 1× Dick Durbin PERSON · 1× Kash Patel PERSON · 1× MAGA ORG · 1× Senate ORG · 1× The Atlantic ORG · 1×

Narrative

If you’re one of the fortunate souls who remains unfamiliar with Patel, let me fill you in: Trump’s FBI guy has, in the past, floated the idea that Jan. 6 was a Deep State setup, purged thousands of FBI workers after taking up the job, used polygraphs to test the loyalty of officials to the Trump administration, and overseen the detainment and deportation of thousands, the majority of whom have no criminal record.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 Pushed on that, he added that he wouldn’t have wanted to exclude “victims of bestiality” from applying for FBI jobs.

Claims (90 extracted, 6 hedged)

FBI director Kash Patel testified to the Senate today in a hearing that almost immediately descended into discussions about bestiality. asserted
that → testify → bestiality
Because that’s the world we live in now. asserted
we → ’ → ?
If you’re one of the fortunate souls who remains unfamiliar with Patel, let me fill you in: Trump’s FBI guy has, in the past, floated the idea that Jan. 6 was a Deep State setup, purged thousands of FBI workers after taking up the job, used polygraphs to test the loyalty of officials to the Trump administration, and overseen the detainment and deportation of thousands, the majority of whom have no criminal record. asserted
majority → ’re → record
He believes that no media can be trusted, and is currently suing The Atlantic for publishing a highly critical article about him. asserted
media → believe → him
Oh, and he removed the requirement for FBI recruits that they had never had sex with animals. asserted
they → remove → animals
As with most people connected to this hall-of-mirrors version of an administration, Patel is a mixture of scary, sarcastic and bizarre. asserted
Patel → connect → scary
He opened today with the usual MAGA stuff about how he’s changed the FBI to “let cops be cops” and how he’s been busy “capturing literally the worst of the worst.” asserted
he → open → worst
He listed off a few data points about child abusers and “gangbangers” who have been imprisoned under his watch. asserted
who → list → watch
And then the questioning began. asserted
questioning → begin → ?
You’ve removed the requirement for people joining the FBI not to have criminal convictions for stealing, soliciting sex, or engaging in bestiality, Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin of Ohio noted to Patel. asserted
Durbin → remove → Patel
Does that make your standards higher? asserted
standards → make → ?
(Patel had recently monologued about how historically high the FBI’s standards are now, because of changes like asking potential recruits to do a single pull-up. asserted
standards → monologue → up
“Our standards have never been higher,” Patel replied. asserted
Patel → reply → ?
Pushed on that, he added that he wouldn’t have wanted to exclude “victims of bestiality” from applying for FBI jobs. asserted
he → push → jobs
Which all sounds very woke and lovely, until you consider that the victims of bestiality are animals. asserted
victims → sound → bestiality
“You’ve turned that upside-down,” said Durbin, dismissively, as he wrapped up his time. asserted
he → turn → time
Another senator wasn’t going to let it go so easily — and this was, in fact, a Republican: Sen. John Neely Kennedy of Louisiana. asserted
this → go → Louisiana
Kennedy began by demanding that Patel “pull that mic closer to you,” before diving into why anyone would remove the three requirements for anyone applying to the FBI. asserted
anyone → begin → FBI
It’s to protect victims, Patel responded; to which Kennedy clarified, “So it’s not if you frequented a prostitute, it’s because you were a prostitute?” asserted
you → ’ → prostitute
Patel nodded. asserted
Patel → nod → ?
Kennedy paused, considered, seemed to find that reasonable, then leaned forward again and asked, slowly, “What about the bestiality?” asserted
that → pause → bestiality
This is where things began to descend again. asserted
things → begin → ?
Patel again said he was protecting victims, to which Kennedy asked the obvious question: “So you don’t disqualify the animal?” asserted
you → say → animal
At this point, Patel should probably have launched into some pre-prepared spiel about abuse, but instead he let out a nervous laugh and said, “We have great canines but we’re not going to disqualify animals.” asserted
we → launch → animals
Kennedy didn’t find this acceptable. asserted
this → find → ?
Do you realize, he asked Patel, that removing requirements like this makes everybody here look bad? asserted
everybody → realize → this
This has hurt the FBI, having people hear that they seemingly don’t think bestiality is a big deal. asserted
bestiality → hurt → FBI
With a perplexed look on his face, he finished with: “Why would you even get into bestiality?” asserted
you → finish → bestiality
Again, this is where Patel probably should have had a spiel prepared, or perhaps even have taken a breath. asserted
spiel → have → breath
But instead he immediately retorted: “We are not into bestiality.” asserted
We → retort → bestiality
Which just isn’t a sentence you should ever have to say in politics. asserted
you → have → politics
“I know you’re not,” said Kennedy, “but you changed the qualifications and you brought in bestiality.” asserted
you → know → bestiality
Patel responded that someone might have “involuntarily” got involved with animals. uncertain
someone → respond → animals
Kennedy, remaining perplexed, asked, “How do you involuntarily do it?” asserted
you → remain → it
Patel finally clicked into gear here, and described how a recruiting officer had supposedly told him it can happen that a person who has been trafficked can be forced to do all manner of sexual acts on camera as part of their abuse, including with animals. asserted
who → click → animals
It’s a fair, if extremely niche, point. asserted
It → ’ → ?
One cannot imagine that it’s a problem they come up against regularly in FBI recruitment, and also one can imagine that in the right circumstances it could probably be dealt with. uncertain
it → imagine → circumstances
When people came to you with a list of things to remove, Kennedy pressed, “and you saw bestiality — I say this with respect — to the person who recommended it, why didn’t you say: What planet did you parachute in from?” asserted
you → come → planet
Patel, who can’t even stick by his own absurd metrics and clearly was at this point worried he was going to start being known in public as ‘The Bestiality Guy,’ then quickly claimed, “That was my initial response, Senator!” asserted
That → stick → Guy
Needless to say, this continued, and it was never entirely resolved. asserted
it → say → ?
…and 50 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support