Photo via Toronto Star

Sullivan claims Peltola is 'still lying' about campaign's involvement in Alaska ballot controversy

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Riccardi, N. (2026, November 1). Sullivan claims Peltola is 'still lying' about campaign's involvement in Alaska ballot controversy. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/world/united-states/sullivan-claims-peltola-is-still-lying-about-campaign-s-involvement-in-alaska-ballot-controversy/article_08fa3403-8d43-5250-89f5-ba1d708a1d37.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-11-01 · by Nicholas Riccardi

Quick Summary

Dan Sullivan, the Republican senator, claims that his Democratic opponent Mary Peltola is lying about her lack of involvement in placing another candidate named Dan Sullivan on Alaska's ballot to confuse voters. This move could affect which party controls the Senate. Republicans believe evidence from a New York Times report supports their claim, showing Peltola’s campaign was behind the effort through payments to operatives recruiting decoy candidates.
Written by AI on 2026-11-01, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 1, 2026, the FBI has begun investigating Mary Peltola's campaign for alleged collusion in recruiting a decoy candidate named Dan Sullivan, sharing a name with Republican incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan. The investigation stems from revelations by The New York Times on October 28 that Peltola's campaign and senior Democratic officials participated in efforts to recruit spoiler candidates against the incumbent, including Dan J. Sullivan, a retired teacher who is not actively campaigning.

The New York Post reported on November 1 that FBI agents are now reaching out to donors of the decoy candidate Dan Sullivan to inquire about potential deception. This follows claims by Republican Senator Dan Sullivan and his supporters that Peltola's campaign was involved in confusing voters through deceptive tactics, potentially impacting voter choices in Alaska's Senate race.

Republican Senator Dan Sullivan warned on November 1 that he could lose votes due to the alleged scheme, stating it is "certainly deceitful, if not illegal." He accused Peltola’s team of attempting to manipulate election outcomes by tricking Alaskan voters into supporting a candidate with a similar name.

Written for “FBI Investigates Alaska Senate Race” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 119 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 121486 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-01

Story

📰 FBI Investigates Alaska Senate Race
Crime & Law · 120 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 33% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A describes initial reporting about Peltola's campaign recruiting a second Dan Sullivan, while Article B covers a later response from Senator Sullivan disputing claims by his opponent.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes Peltola's initial statement about her lack of involvement, while Article B reports Sullivan's response to this claim days later.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 23 claims Outlet record 68/100
“While both articles discuss the same controversy involving multiple candidates named Dan Sullivan, Article A reports Peltola's denial and initial developments of an investigation, while Article B focuses on Sullivan's response days later, indicating ongoing debate rather than a single event.”
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 26 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on Mary Peltola's initial stance regarding her involvement in recruiting 'Decoy Dan', while Article B describes Senator Sullivan's response and claims several days later.”
New York Post
Hedges 4 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss the same controversy involving Mary Peltola and her campaign's alleged involvement in recruiting a person named Dan Sullivan to confuse voters, they describe different aspects of the ongoing debate—Article A focuses on revelations about Peltola being aware, while Article B is about Sullivan's response to these claims.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 26 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different reactions to the same incident, not the identical occurrence itself.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss the same controversy involving Mary Peltola's campaign and the presence of a second Dan Sullivan on the ballot, Article A breaks down a report alleging the involvement, while Article B covers Senator Sullivan's response to that allegation.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 1 of 31 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss the same controversy involving Mary Peltola's campaign and an additional candidate named Daniel J. Sullivan, Article A focuses on reporting from the New York Times about the initial allegations and efforts by Peltola’s team, while Article B covers Senator Dan Sullivan's reaction to these claims days later.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
3
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
33%
1 of 3 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
120
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-01 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 11028 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Nicholas Riccardi
19 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 "More fundamentally, the United States provides no workable plan as to how it proposes to segregate ballots cast for Daniel J. Sullivan on Election Day and then conduct a court-ordered unspecified "investigation" of those ballots in a manner that would preserve voter secrecy," she wrote.
🔮 WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan said Sunday that he doubted claims by his Democratic opponent that she had no idea her top political aides were involved in recruiting a retired schoolteacher also named Dan Sullivan onto the ballot to confuse voters in a race that could determine which party controls the Senate.
🔮 It added there would be no way to do that without violating voter privacy.
🔮 It also found at least 22 are U.S. citizens, and many more may correspond to those of confirmed citizens.
🔮 It also found at least 22 are U.S. citizens and many more may correspond to those of confirmed citizens.
🔮 In Alaska, Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan is facing three other challengers on the state’s final ballot in a race that could determine control of the Senate — Democrat Mary Peltola, who was previously the state’s lone House member, and two candidates who have barely campaigned, including a retired school teacher named Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. Alaska Republicans have long suspected the second Sullivan of being a Democratic plant, and the Trump administration took the unusual step last week of suing to prevent certification of a possible Peltola victory until it could be determined if voters were confused. The New York Times this week reported that internal campaign texts and communications showed the Peltola campaign recruited the second Sullivan, leading the president to call for the Democrat’s prosecution and his Justice Department to issue a flurry of subpoenas in a criminal investigation.
🔮 While Trump maintains some support for his handling of the border, polling shows voters disapprove of his approach to immigration, a striking turnaround that could undermine Republican attempts to maintain control of Congress in the midterms.
🔮 The Democratic campaign for Alaska’s U.S. Senate seat was involved in efforts to place on the ballot a candidate with the same name as Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan in a bid to confuse voters in a race that could determine which party controls the chamber, The New York Times reported Wednesday.
🔮 “The least competitive election of our lifetimes will lead to the least accountable and least representative Congress of our lifetimes.”
🔮 Now, many like Martinez are souring on the president and his party, which could upend the balance of power in Washington in the Nov. 3 elections.
Also by Nicholas Riccardi
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 19 articles by Nicholas Riccardi →

Topics

Democratic Republican Republicans Senate WASHINGTON

Subjects

Dan Sullivan PERSON · 2× Peltola PERSON · 2× Democratic NORP · 1× Mary Peltola PERSON · 1× New York Times ORG · 1× Republican NORP · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× Senate ORG · 1× Sullivan PERSON · 1× WASHINGTON GPE · 1×

Narrative

They say their suspicions were confirmed by a New York Times report last week that was based on interviews with Peltola’s ex-campaign manager, text messages and campaign finance documents showing that an operative trying to recruit decoy candidates was paid by a group backing Peltola.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-01
🔮 WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan said Sunday that he doubted claims by his Democratic opponent that she had no idea her top political aides were involved in recruiting a retired schoolteacher also named Dan Sullivan onto the ballot to confuse voters in a race that could determine which party controls the Senate.

Claims (3 extracted, 1 hedged)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan said Sunday that he doubted claims by his Democratic opponent that she had no idea her top political aides were involved in recruiting a retired schoolteacher also named Dan Sullivan onto the ballot to confuse voters in a race that could determine which party controls the Senate. uncertain
party → say → Senate
Republicans have long suspected that Mary Peltola, a former congresswoman, and her campaign were behind the presence of the second Sullivan on the ballot. asserted
Peltola → suspect → ballot
They say their suspicions were confirmed by a New York Times report last week that was based on interviews with Peltola’s ex-campaign manager, text messages and campaign finance documents showing that an operative trying to recruit decoy candidates was paid by a group backing Peltola. asserted
operative → say → Peltola
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support