Photo via TIME

Why a Top House Democrat Now Supports Impeaching Trump and Hegseth

Read the original at TIME ↗
Cite

Popli, N. (2026, November 2). Why a Top House Democrat Now Supports Impeaching Trump and Hegseth. TIME. https://time.com/article/2026/11/02/top-house-armed-services-democrat-backs-impeaching-trump-and-hegseth/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

TIME · collected 2026-11-02 · by Nik Popli

Quick Summary

Rep. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, now supports impeaching President Donald Trump and may back impeachment proceedings against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. In a recent interview with TIME, Smith cited Trump's dangerous rhetoric and actions, particularly regarding Russia and Ukraine, as reasons for his shift in stance. This change is significant given that Democrats are likely to regain control of the House after Tuesday’s midterm elections, potentially putting Smith in a position to lead investigations into military affairs.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Rep. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, now supports impeaching President Donald Trump after previously declining to do so due to concerns about strengthening Trump politically. This shift comes as Democrats aim to reclaim control of the House in Tuesday's midterm elections. Smith also inclines towards supporting impeachment proceedings against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, making him one of the most senior Democrats to endorse such a move. He cites growing concern over Trump’s erratic behavior and governance, labeling him "beyond dangerous." If Democrats win, Smith is poised to chair the Armed Services Committee, positioning him centrally in investigations into military operations and defense policies.

Written for “Impeachment Support Increases” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but all 3 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 122933: attributed speech only · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 Impeachment Support Increases
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 16% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different events related to impeachment but do not refer to the exact same incident at the same time and place.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
50
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
16%
8 of 50 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
59/100
TIME's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

TIME · 790 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Nik Popli
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 When the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee was asked by TIME in May about the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump, he declined to commit, warning that every impeachment he had witnessed during his decades in Congress had left its target politically stronger.
🔮 The demand offers a preview of the intense scrutiny Trump would face in the final years of his presidency if Democrats reclaim the House in next week’s midterm elections.
🔮 Zacharia would replace Karoline Leavitt, who stepped down in August, in the position.
🔮 They could campaign on fixing a rigged economy, reducing corporate power, or raising taxes on the rich without feeling compelled to affirm their belief in the economic system itself.
🔮 Sometime next year, the U.S. government will hit its debt ceiling again.
🔮 In a post on Truth Social, Trump accused the three outlets of repeatedly publishing “FAKE NEWS” and warned that other news organizations could face similar restrictions.
🔮 Much of the scrutiny would be expected to come from the Judiciary and Oversight Committees, the traditional engines of congressional investigations.
🔮 Vice President J.D. Vance said Thursday that he would not characterize the United States as being at war with Iran, even as the two countries have exchanged strikes in recent days and the Trump Administration has declined to say when a conflict now stretching beyond six months might finally end.
Also by Nik Popli
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Nik Popli →

Topics

Democrat Democrats House TIME Ukraine

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 12× Democrats NORP · 8× Smith PERSON · 8× House ORG · 6× Ukraine GPE · 4× TIME ORG · 3× Congress ORG · 1× Democrat NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× the House Armed Services Committee ORG · 1×

Narrative

"If the goal is to get Pete Hegseth out of the Department of Defense to stop corruption, to erect some guardrails against this runaway, reckless administration, and to protect the country against the increased erratic and dangerous behavior of Donald Trump, then we have to look post-November what the Congress looks like," Crow says.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02
🔮 When the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee was asked by TIME in May about the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump, he declined to commit, warning that every impeachment he had witnessed during his decades in Congress had left its target politically stronger.

Claims (50 extracted, 8 hedged)

When the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee was asked by TIME in May about the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump, he declined to commit, warning that every impeachment he had witnessed during his decades in Congress had left its target politically stronger. uncertain
he → ask → target
Five months later, Rep. Adam Smith of Washington is prepared to take that risk. asserted
Smith → take → risk
With Democrats hoping to reclaim control of the House in Tuesday's midterm elections, Smith says that he now supports impeaching Trump and is inclined to also back proceedings against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, making him one of the most senior Democrats to endorse such a course. asserted
him → hop → course
"Trump has become beyond dangerous. asserted
Trump → become → ?
He is just completely out of control in what he says and how he is governing," Smith told TIME in an interview a week before the election. asserted
Smith → say → election
"I think we have to try, even if it doesn't succeed." asserted
it → think → ?
Smith's endorsement is particularly significant because he would be in line to chair the Armed Services Committee if Democrats win the House, putting him at the center of investigations into the Pentagon's handling of the war with Iran, its approach to Ukraine, and military operations in Latin America. asserted
Democrats → chair → America
His position comes as Democrats prepare for the possibility of reclaiming congressional power with little agreement over how aggressively to confront the President. asserted
Democrats → come → President
Interviews with more than two dozen Democrats reveal a party broadly convinced that Trump has engaged in conduct warranting impeachment, but deeply divided over whether another attempt to remove him would be an effective use of its authority. asserted
attempt → reveal → authority
Trump's two previous impeachments ended in Senate acquittals, and even a Democratic victory this week is unlikely to produce anything approaching the two-thirds majority required for conviction. asserted
victory → end → conviction
Smith, who has served in the House since 1996, noted previously that he was one of the few House members to have sat through three impeachments. asserted
he → serve → impeachments
"Every single time the person impeached got stronger after they were impeached than before," Smith told TIME in May, arguing that Democrats needed to consider what another impeachment could realistically achieve rather than pursue it simply to demonstrate their willingness to confront Trump. uncertain
impeachment → impeach → Trump
"I want to make sure that if we're going down that road it's going to help defeat Trump and his poisonous ideology," he said at the time. asserted
he → want → time
Since then, he says, Trump's increasingly conciliatory posture toward Russian President Vladimir Putin, his decisions involving American support for Ukraine, and his public rhetoric have convinced him that the President's continued tenure presents an extraordinary danger. asserted
tenure → say → danger
"The Ukraine stuff definitely had a profound impact," Smith says. asserted
Smith → have → impact
"When I saw how close he was getting to Putin and shutting off support for Ukraine, being more pro-Putin. asserted
he → see → Ukraine
I mean, that's a big part of it." asserted
that → mean → it
He also cites Trump's increasingly "unhinged speeches," including remarks about rising gasoline prices amid the war in the Middle East. asserted
He → cite → East
Smith’s willingness to embrace impeachment puts him at odds with more cautious Democrats who want the party to prioritize addressing the economic concerns that have dominated the campaign, while establishing an investigative record that might ultimately lead to impeachment. uncertain
that → embrace → impeachment
He acknowledges the formidable obstacles to removing Trump but argues that the political environment has changed since the President's first term. asserted
environment → acknowledge → term
"I don't think it will be viewed as negatively or as partisan as in the previous two efforts, just because the public is waking up to the con game that Trump put on," he says now. asserted
he → think → that
Other senior House Democrats are less certain that pursuing impeachment would accomplish much, even if they share Smith's assessment of Trump's conduct. asserted
they → pursue → conduct
Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, who led the House managers during Trump's second impeachment trial in 2021, says he has "little doubt that the president has committed multiple impeachable offenses," citing what he describes as unconstitutional military action and abuses of congressional spending authority. asserted
he → lead → authority
But he draws a distinction between establishing grounds for impeachment and deciding whether another trial would be the best use of Congress's time and political capital. asserted
trial → draw → time
"The question of whether he committed impeachable offenses and whether we are going to pursue impeachment are two different issues," Raskin tells TIME. asserted
Raskin → commit → TIME
Trump was impeached in 2019 over his dealings with Ukraine and again in 2021 over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. asserted
Trump → impeach → Capitol
Both proceedings ended in acquittal, although seven Republican senators voted to convict him in the second trial. asserted
senators → end → trial
While some Democrats regarded those efforts as necessary to establish a historical and constitutional record, another impeachment could consume months of congressional attention, galvanize Trump's supporters, and leave voters questioning what the party had accomplished with its new majority. uncertain
party → regard → majority
Sen. Adam Schiff of California, who led the prosecution during Trump's first impeachment trial, says Democrats should avoid reaching conclusions before knowing the composition of the next Congress and what investigations might uncover. uncertain
investigations → lead → what
"There's no question he's been engaging in conduct that is very likely impeachable," Schiff told TIME. asserted
Schiff → be → TIME
Schiff disputes the notion that the earlier impeachment efforts strengthened Trump politically, but argues that Democrats should concentrate initially on investigating corruption that has affected Americans' finances. asserted
that → dispute → finances
"Our primary focus ought to be on corruption that has raised the cost of living for people," he says. asserted
he → raise → people
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has similarly declined to commit to impeachment, saying Democrats "haven't ruled anything in, and we haven't ruled anything out." asserted
we → decline → anything
He has indicated that investigations should help determine whether the House pursues that course. asserted
House → indicate → course
Some Democrats are looking toward members of Trump's Cabinet, particularly Hegseth, as potentially more viable targets, reasoning that Republicans who would never vote to remove the President might be more willing to turn against a defense secretary whose leadership has drawn criticism from within their own party. uncertain
leadership → look → party
"There are Republicans who would support impeaching Hegseth who might not support doing it to Trump," Smith says. uncertain
Smith → be → Trump
The Defense Secretary has faced mounting scrutiny over his handling of the Iran war, the removal of senior military officers, and the Pentagon's relationship with Congress. asserted
Secretary → face → Congress
Some Republicans have publicly expressed frustration with his leadership and the department's failure to provide adequate information about the war's objectives, costs, and duration. asserted
Republicans → express → objectives
A push to impeach him has already taken shape in the Republican-controlled House, although Trump has defended Hegseth, calling him a "great warrior" and dismissing Democratic efforts to remove him. asserted
Trump → impeach → him
Raskin says that impeaching a Cabinet secretary would be less likely to consume Congress's agenda or raise the same concerns about overturning the result of a presidential election. asserted
impeaching → say → election
…and 10 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support