Photo via Daily Mail

Alaska voter loses it after realizing he may have voted for wrong Dan Sullivan amid Democrat ballot scheme

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Lepore, S. M. (2026, November 3). Alaska voter loses it after realizing he may have voted for wrong Dan Sullivan amid Democrat ballot scheme. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16260283/Alaska-Dan-Sullivan-Democrat-ballot.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-11-03 · by Stephen M. Lepore

Quick Summary

An Alaska voter expressed confusion during a News Nation interview, worried he might have voted for Daniel J Sullivan instead of incumbent Dan S Sullivan due to a "Decoy Dan" scheme aimed at splitting Republican votes in the close Senate race. The Justice Department had attempted to intervene but a federal judge dismissed their effort to block election certification, highlighting legal challenges and voter confusion surrounding the similar names.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Mary Peltola's campaign, running for the U.S. Senate seat in Alaska against incumbent Republican Dan Sullivan, was involved in efforts to place another candidate named Dan J. Sullivan on the ballot to confuse voters. According to reports from The New York Times and other outlets, text messages between members of Peltola’s team discussed recruiting individuals with the same name as their opponent. Election authorities attempted to disqualify the second Dan Sullivan but failed to do so in time for the election.

The plan also reportedly involved creating a third-party "MAGA party" to siphon votes from incumbent Senator Dan Sullivan, though this idea was eventually abandoned. The race is seen as crucial because it could determine which party controls the Senate, with Democrats currently holding 47 seats compared to Republicans' 53.

On election day and in the immediate aftermath, Republican supporters expressed concern that they might have mistakenly voted for "Decoy Dan" Sullivan instead of incumbent Senator Dan S. Sullivan, raising fears about potential vote confusion. The New York Times investigation also revealed efforts by a Democratic PAC to send voter guides replacing Sen. Dan Sullivan with the spoiler candidate.

Incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan has accused Democrats of engaging in election cheating, highlighting this as one of the most significant election controversies in Alaska's history.

Written for “Alaska Senate Race Controversy” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 101 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Alaska Senate Race Controversy
Politics · 102 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 36% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
Hedges 4 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 40 claims Outlet record 61/100
Fox News
Hedges 2 of 36 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses Governor Dunleavy's warning about an election system flaw, while Article B reports on a voter's frustration after potentially voting for the wrong candidate due to the 'Decoy Dan' scandal. These describe related but distinct incidents.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 7 of 26 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses Daniel J Sullivan leaving his hometown amid accusations of being a liberal plant, while Article B focuses on a voter's confusion and frustration over potentially voting for the wrong 'Dan Sullivan' due to the similar names in the race.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses legal action and filings related to the election, while Article B reports on a voter's reaction and confusion at the polls.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 21 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses Senator Dan Sullivan's stance on election results and the DOJ lawsuit, while Article B focuses on a voter's confusion regarding similar names on the ballot.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 41 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A describes Dan Sullivan's reaction and Trump's comments about the alleged scheme, while Article B reports on a voter's potential confusion and frustration after voting, which is a different incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 2 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses the broader implications and potential court fight over Democrats' alleged attempt to siphon votes, while Article B focuses on a specific voter's reaction and confusion about voting for the wrong Dan Sullivan. Although related, they describe different aspects of the situation.”
New York Post
Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the emergence of a report about an alleged effort to recruit a second Dan Sullivan, while Article B reports on a voter's frustration after casting their ballot, which seems like a separate incident despite being related to the same election scandal.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 3 of 40 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss the 'Decoy Dan' Sullivan scandal in Alaska's Senate race, Article A is about voters responding to the alleged scheme, while Article B reports on a specific voter expressing frustration after possibly voting for the wrong candidate due to confusion.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
36%
12 of 33 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
69/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
102
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 9239 article(s) · 22 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 22 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Stephen M. Lepore
86 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Take Daily Mail's quiz and find out NBC News elections guru Steve Kornacki couldn't believe his eyes as the numbers came in for South Carolina's Senate race. Pediatrician Annie Andrews narrowly defeated Republican Darline Graham, who was personally chosen by Trump and had sought to permanently fill the seat of her late brother Lindsey Graham.
🔮 Take Daily Mail's quiz and find out Karen Bass attempted to land a fatal blow to Nithya Raman's insurgent campaign on election day, releasing a series of the councilmember's blunders while on the trail for mayor of Los Angeles.
🔮 She told CNN she was baffled by Stevens' behavior and thought it could work in El-Sayed's favor.
🔮 Trump has previously said the US wouldn't launch strikes on Iran before the midterms.
🔮 Take the quiz to find out A voter said he may have fallen for the 'Decoy Dan' Sullivan scandal in Alaska's razor-thin Senate race.
🔮 Not that there's anything wrong with it, just that I might be gay.
🔮 Take Daily Mail's quiz and find out The Republican Party is continuing to panic over Darline Graham's Senate bid, with some in the GOP worried that her late brother Lindsey's seat may be in danger of falling to Democrats. Darline was hand picked by Donald Trump to replace her brother after Lindsey died in July.
🔮 Vice President JD Vance's home was transformed into Hogwarts for Halloween as the second most powerful man in the country turned himself into Dumbledore Donald Trump speaks to members of the press as he arrives for a Halloween party at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm Beach Even those who disagree with Vance's politics found his costume endearing since he appears willing to poke fun at himself.
🔮 Take Daily Mail's quiz and find out Donald Trump was told by a federal judge that he was 'grasping at straws' as he threw out the President's $10billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal over his alleged 'birthday card' to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump had sued the paper and media mogul Rupert Murdoch after it published a letter last year, allegedly signed by the President and featuring a lewd drawing with the message: 'May every day be another wonderful secret.'
🔮 Tensions again spilled into public view Wednesday when Stevens' fiancé, Jason Turkish, told The Detroit News that he would vote for Republican Mike Rogers.
Also by Stephen M. Lepore
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 86 articles by Stephen M. Lepore →

Topics

Alaska GOP Republican Senate The Justice Department

Subjects

Alaska GPE · 8× Sullivan PERSON · 5× Republican NORP · 4× Senate ORG · 4× Trump PERSON · 4× DOJ ORG · 3× Daniel J Sullivan PERSON · 3× Gleason PERSON · 3× Peltola PERSON · 3× Daniel S Sullivan PERSON · 2×

Narrative

But US District Judge Sharon Gleason ruled that the Trump administration lacked standing in the lawsuit, which sought to force Alaska to segregate its ballots in the event that US Senator Dan S Sullivan, a Republican, lost his reelection bid to Democratic candidate Mary Peltola.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 Take the quiz to find out A voter said he may have fallen for the 'Decoy Dan' Sullivan scandal in Alaska's razor-thin Senate race.

Claims (33 extracted, 12 hedged)

Take the quiz to find out A voter said he may have fallen for the 'Decoy Dan' Sullivan scandal in Alaska's razor-thin Senate race. uncertain
he → take → race
The race has gained outsized attention in recent weeks following reports that Daniel J Sullivan, a Republican whose name is nearly identical to the incumbent Daniel S Sullivan, may have entered the race as a spoiler candidate with the aim of splintering GOP support. uncertain
name → gain → support
One voter visibly displayed his frustration with the confusing ballot in an interview with News Nation when he was asked after casting his ballot. asserted
he → display → ballot
'I just might be having a brain freeze, but I don't remember the second Dan Sullivan,' he said. uncertain
he → have → Sullivan
He said he believes he may have cast his vote for the 'Decoy' Dan instead of the Republican nominee. uncertain
he → say → nominee
'There is a slight possibility I voted for the wrong Dan Sullivan. asserted
I → be → Sullivan
I mean there is a slight possibility — I'm hoping I'm just kinda getting paranoid,' he said, with an anxious chuckle. asserted
he → mean → chuckle
'Now I want to look at a sample ballot to see what position he's in, because I'm hoping I — well, yeah.' asserted
I → want → position
One voter actually defended the practice when asked while casting his ballot by the network. asserted
voter → defend → network
An Alaska voter said he may have fallen for the 'Decoy Dan' Sullivan scandal in the state's close Senate race. uncertain
he → say → race
The race has gained outsized attention in recent weeks following reports that Daniel J Sullivan (pictured), a Republican whose name is nearly identical to the incumbent Daniel S Sullivan, may have entered the race as a spoiler candidate with the aim of splintering GOP support ' uncertain
name → gain → support
This is something that both parties do, so in my opinion it’s much ado about nothing,' he said. asserted
he → do → nothing
A federal judge on Sunday dismissed the Trump administration's effort to preemptively block the certification of Alaska's Senate election results. asserted
judge → dismiss → results
The massive blow to Trump's effort comes two days before the November 3 midterm elections. asserted
blow → come → elections
The Justice Department had argued that Daniel J Sullivan, whom the Trump administration has dubbed 'Decoy Dan,' entered the race as a 'frivolous candidate to confuse voters. asserted
administration → argue → voters
' 'Alaskan voters deserve a fair election, not to be misled in an attempt to rig outcomes,' the DOJ had stated. asserted
DOJ → deserve → outcomes
But US District Judge Sharon Gleason ruled that the Trump administration lacked standing in the lawsuit, which sought to force Alaska to segregate its ballots in the event that US Senator Dan S Sullivan, a Republican, lost his reelection bid to Democratic candidate Mary Peltola. asserted
Sullivan → rule → Peltola
DOJ is now appealing the ruling, but it's unclear that any major action will be taken before Election Day on Tuesday, November 3. uncertain
action → appeal → Tuesday
The Justice Department argued in its lawsuit that the second Sullivan's campaign is an attempt to 'dupe Alaska’s voters into believing that he is Senator Sullivan,' and asked the court to segregate ballots if Peltola won. asserted
Peltola → argue → ballots
But Gleason said Sunday that the there was no way to do so without violating voters' right to privacy and the secrecy of the ballot. asserted
Gleason → say → ballot
A sample election ballot is displayed in Anchorage, Alaska, showing both of the Daniel Sullivan candidates Former Representative Mary Peltola, a Democrat from Alaska and US Senate candidate The DOJ, she said, offered 'no workable plan' as to how the government might segregate the ballots in question without violating voters' fundamental privacy protections. uncertain
government → display → protections
'The absence of any explanation from the United States as to how its requested relief could redress its alleged injury while simultaneously maintaining the secrecy of the ballot is telling,' Gleason said. uncertain
Gleason → request → ballot
'Simply, the Court cannot grant the United States the relief it seeks.' asserted
it → grant → relief
The ruling comes as Sullivan and Peltola are currently locked in a tight race, which the Cook Political Report has ranked as a 'toss-up.' asserted
Report → come → up
The results could also tilt the balance of power in Democrats' favor in the Senate, should Peltola edge out Sullivan in his reelection bid. uncertain
Peltola → tilt → bid
Gleason denied the Trump administration from further amending its complaint to the court, noting that doing so would be futile and burdensome for election officials in the Alaska with just two days before the November 3 elections. She also noted that any additional scrutiny into the ballots could discourage voters from participating in elections. uncertain
scrutiny → deny → elections
The dismissal is the latest in a series of high-profile defeats the Trump administration has seen as it has tried and failed to assert more federal control in the midterm elections. asserted
it → see → elections
These efforts have touched off a torrent of lawsuits from state and local election officials, who argue that the efforts illegally infringe on states' rights, including their right to administer elections under the Voting Rights Act and the US Constitution. asserted
efforts → touch → Act
But it's not the only effort the Trump administration has launched in Alaska in a bid to investigate the so-called 'Decoy Dan.' asserted
administration → launch → Dan
Last month, the Justice Department separately launched a criminal investigation into the campaign of the 'second' Dan Sullivan. asserted
Department → launch → Sullivan
The extent of that probe is unclear, though it is believed to hinge in part on allegations of conspiracy under a Voting Rights Act-era law. uncertain
it → believe → law
Peltola's campaign and the national Democratic Party denied any connection to Daniel J Sullivan's candidacy. asserted
campaign → deny → candidacy
The White House directed the Daily Mail to the DOJ for comment. asserted
House → direct → comment
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support