Photo via ABC News (AU)

Lindsay Clancy lawyer urges judge to dismiss case or put it back on trial

Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗
Cite

Lindsay Clancy lawyer urges judge to dismiss case or put it back on trial. (2026, November 3). ABC News (AU). https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-11-03/lindsay-clancy-lawyers-dismiss-case-or-put-back-on-trial/107339758

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-11-03

Quick Summary

Lindsay Clancy's lawyer is urging a judge to either dismiss murder charges against her or set a new trial date after a mistrial was declared due to an 11-1 split in favor of acquittal. The defense argues the case should have been dismissed earlier on double jeopardy grounds, citing that removing the lone juror who favored conviction could have led to a unanimous decision without needing a mistrial. A hearing is scheduled for November 16 to determine the next steps.
Written by AI on 2026-11-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Lindsey Clancy, accused of murdering her three young children in Massachusetts, returned to court on Monday, November 2, as prosecutors aim to retry the case after a hung jury. The trial ended in September when one juror refused to change their vote, leading to a mistrial declaration by Judge William Sullivan. Prosecutors argued against dismissing charges and are preparing for another trial despite Clancy's defense asserting that retrying her violates double jeopardy rules. A hearing on November 16 will determine the next steps, with both sides presenting arguments: prosecutors want to proceed with justice for Clancy’s children, while her legal team seeks either dismissal or a new trial date.

Written for “Lindsay Clancy Retrial Proceedings” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 20 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 124675 · logged 2026-11-03

Story

📰 Lindsay Clancy Retrial Proceedings
Crime & Law · 21 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 3 of 43 claims Outlet record 64/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 60/100
BBC News
Hedges 4 of 25 claims Outlet record 68/100
South China Morning Post
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 63/100
New York Post
Hedges 3 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different stages of the legal process regarding Lindsay Clancy's case, not the same specific incident.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Independent
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 59/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different stages of the legal process regarding Lindsay Clancy's case, not the same specific incident.”
NBC News
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different points in the legal proceedings of Lindsay Clancy's case, with Article A covering prosecutors' response to a motion to dismiss and Article B discussing Lindsay Clancy's lawyer urging for either dismissal or a new trial date.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
4 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
68/100
ABC News (AU)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
21
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 4717 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

No reporter is named on this article.

Topics

Massachusetts Plymouth

Subjects

Clancy PERSON · 11× Reddington PERSON · 4× Sullivan PERSON · 4× Desronvil PERSON · 3× Lindsay Clancy's PERSON · 2× Massachusetts GPE · 2× Plymouth GPE · 2× Kevin Reddington PERSON · 1× Timothy Cruz PERSON · 1× William Sullivan PERSON · 1×

Narrative

A hearing held on Monday, November 2, in Plymouth, Massachusetts, marked the second time Ms Clancy has been in court since a mistrial was declared, after jurors were unable to agree whether she was legally responsible for killing her three young children.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-03
🔮 Warning: This story contains details that may be distressing for some readers.
2026-11-03 · ABC News (AU)
Lindsay Clancy lawyer urges judge to dismiss case or put it back on trial · assertive framing

Claims (36 extracted, 4 hedged)

In short: Lindsay Clancy's lawyers say either her murder case should be dismissed or a new trial date set. asserted
date → say → ?
They argued the dismissal on grounds the lone juror who favoured conviction should have been removed. What's next? A hearing has been scheduled for November 16. asserted
hearing → argue → November
Lindsay Clancy's lawyer has urged a judge to either dismiss the murder charges against her or put her back on trial. asserted
lawyer → urge → trial
Warning: This story contains details that may be distressing for some readers. uncertain
that → contain → readers
A hearing held on Monday, November 2, in Plymouth, Massachusetts, marked the second time Ms Clancy has been in court since a mistrial was declared, after jurors were unable to agree whether she was legally responsible for killing her three young children. asserted
she → hold → children
In September, the jury was split 11-1 in favour of acquittal. asserted
jury → split → acquittal
Ms Clancy's defence team moved to dismiss the murder changes on double jeopardy grounds, arguing the conditions for declaring a mistrial were not met. asserted
conditions → move → mistrial
Under US law a mistrial can only be declared if every other option to proceed has been exhausted. asserted
option → declare → law
Ms Clancy's lawyers argued the judge should have removed a juror who favoured conviction, and then allowed jury deliberation to continue. asserted
deliberation → argue → conviction
Judge William Sullivan did not immediately rule on Monday. asserted
Sullivan → rule → Monday
Ms Clancy's lawyer, Kevin Reddington, implored him to decide quickly. asserted
lawyer → implore → him
He also pressed the Plymouth District Attorney, Timothy Cruz, to reveal whether he plans to try Clancy on murder charges again. asserted
he → press → charges
"I am not going to have this woman sit incarcerated for the next year, or two or three," Mr Reddington said. asserted
Reddington → go → year
"I want a trial and I want it with you and I want it this spring." asserted
I → want → it
Judge Sullivan scheduled another hearing for November 16, and the prosecution said it intends to retry Ms Clancy if the case proceeds. asserted
case → schedule → Clancy
He also suggested a new trial could be held in March next year. uncertain
trial → suggest → March
What happens to Lindsay Clancy now? asserted
What → happen → Clancy
Mr Cruz is yet to announce whether prosecutors would retry Ms Clancy on first-degree murder charges, which carry a mandatory sentence of life in prison without parole if she were convicted. asserted
she → announce → parole
Prosecutors have several options before them, including seeking her conviction on lesser second-degree murder charges, which would give her the option to waive a jury trial and proceed before a judge. asserted
which → have → judge
Ms Clancy has been held in a state psychiatric hospital in Massachusetts before and during trial and would remain in custody through a second trial. asserted
Clancy → hold → trial
Clancy lawyers argue case should have been dismissed asserted
case → argue → ?
Ms Clancy's lawyers argued a mistrial could have been avoided had the judge been more thorough interrogating jurors about their breakdown in deliberations. uncertain
judge → argue → deliberations
The jury's foreperson sent two notes indicating that a lone juror, Michael Desronvil, wasn't following the court's instruction to follow the rules regarding reasonable doubt. asserted
juror → send → doubt
After receiving the notes, Judge Sullivan spoke with each juror, reminded them of their duties and explained what constitutes reasonable doubt. asserted
what → receive → doubt
He asked whether they could apply the law to the case, and all said yes. uncertain
all → ask → case
Mr Reddington urged the judge to investigate Mr Desronvil, who he accused of being untruthful on his jury questionnaire and improperly using his phone during jury deliberations. asserted
he → urge → deliberations
Judge Sullivan told Mr Reddington to stop using the juror's name in open court; he had placed a standing order to seal the names of the jurors to protect them from abuse. asserted
he → tell → abuse
However a number of jurors, including Mr Desronvil, had done interviews in the media, which led Mr Reddington to say that the juror's name "was all over the internet". asserted
name → include → internet
"Why don't we all dial this back a little bit," Judge Sullivan said. asserted
Sullivan → dial → this
Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said the judge had struck the right balance. asserted
judge → say → balance
"It is clear from the record this juror did not refuse to deliberate. asserted
juror → refuse → record
He refused to agree," Ms Sprague said. asserted
Sprague → refuse → ?
Mr Desronvil said in an interview he was certain of Ms Clancy's guilt, but other jurors wouldn't listen. asserted
jurors → say → guilt
His lawyer, Heather O'Connor, urged the judge on Monday not to investigate his conduct any further, saying he had simply done his duty as a juror. asserted
he → urge → juror
She also disputed the allegations of improper phone use. asserted
She → dispute → use
"If that's enough to put a juror under oath, to search their phone, to pull their history, then the lesson [for] every future juror in this Commonwealth is simple: Agree with the majority or potentially be investigated," Ms O'Connor said. asserted
O'Connor → put → majority
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support