Photo via Washington Examiner

Democrats ran radicals and still won. Don’t blame the candidates — Trump owns this bloodbath

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Cordi, P. (2026, November 4). Democrats ran radicals and still won. Don’t blame the candidates — Trump owns this bloodbath. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beltway-confidential/4792361/why-republicans-lost-midterm-elections-trump-iran/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-11-04 · by Peter Cordi

Quick Summary

This opinion piece argues that President Trump's Republican Party suffered a significant defeat in midterm elections, not due to poor candidate choices by Democrats but because of Trump's unpopular foreign policy decisions, particularly regarding Iran. The author claims that despite running radical candidates like James Talarico and Abdul el-Sayed who won their respective races, the Republicans lost primarily due to a failure to market the value of their policies effectively, especially in relation to preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
Written by AI on 2026-11-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 3, 2026, the U.S. midterm elections concluded with a decisive victory for the Democratic Party, which took control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, stripping President Donald Trump's Republican party of their majorities in Congress. Democrats secured over 260 seats in the House and at least 56 seats in the Senate, marking a significant shift from previous expectations that they would only capture one chamber.

The elections were held amid rising concerns about affordability issues under Trump’s presidency, despite his reassurances to the contrary. Voter turnout was near-record high, with over 122 million ballots counted, reflecting widespread dissatisfaction among Americans with the state of the country and policies enacted during Trump's term.

Political analysts had initially predicted a challenging path for Democrats due to factors like voter fatigue and regional strongholds traditionally supporting Republicans. However, Democratic candidates performed exceptionally well across several previously Republican-held states such as Texas, South Carolina, and Kansas.

This outcome could significantly impact U.S. domestic policy over the next two years but may also escalate existing trade tensions and conflicts with global partners like China, given Trump’s continued hardline stance on foreign relations despite the new political landscape in Washington.

Written for “US Midterm Elections Results” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 721 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Midterm Elections Results
Politics · 722 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 97/100
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 77/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 6 of 97 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterm elections; Article A focuses on a panel's reaction to the election results, while Article B attributes the Republican defeat to President Trump's influence.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 44 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and analyses of the same general election outcome but do not describe the exact same incident or time.”
The Intercept
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 38 claims Outlet record 97/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the political situation and outcomes under President Trump's administration, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Democratic Party's performance and candidate issues during an election period, but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Semafor
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss the Republican Party's losses in the midterm elections, they focus on different aspects of the aftermath—Article A attributes blame to bad candidate selection and radical views, while Article B discusses internal recriminations and strategic implications.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 3 claims
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterm elections; one focuses on Republican losses and blames Trump, while the other highlights specific Democratic wins.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
37
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
3 of 37 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
722
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4271 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Peter Cordi
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Fresh off Tuesday’s electoral beatdown, some conservatives are arguing that it would have been better for Iran to have a nuke than for the Democrats to win the midterms.
🔮 If bad candidates were the deciding factor, the Democrats would have been on the receiving end of the 2026 shellacking.
🔮 If not for the heroism of those on board, an untold number of lives could have been lost in the attempted hijacking.
Also by Peter Cordi
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

America Democrats GOP Iran Republicans

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 7× Iran GPE · 6× Republicans NORP · 3× America GPE · 2× Democrats NORP · 2× GOP ORG · 2× Texas GPE · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× James Talarico PERSON · 1× Republican Party ORG · 1×

Narrative

They really rolled out James Talarico, the guy who calls God “non-binary” and is obsessed with “trans children,” and Abdul el Sayed, the terrorist-tied candidate who centered his campaign strategy on blaming Israel for every domestic problem we face — and won!
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 If bad candidates were the deciding factor, the Democrats would have been on the receiving end of the 2026 shellacking.

Claims (37 extracted, 3 hedged)

President Donald Trump’s Republican Party just suffered the worst midterm defeat since the Obama years, and everyone wants to know who or what is to blame. asserted
everyone → suffer → who
One popular explanation is that the GOP ran bad candidates, which it did, but that is not why it lost. asserted
it → run → which
If bad candidates were the deciding factor, the Democrats would have been on the receiving end of the 2026 shellacking. asserted
Democrats → decide → shellacking
They really rolled out James Talarico, the guy who calls God “non-binary” and is obsessed with “trans children,” and Abdul el Sayed, the terrorist-tied candidate who centered his campaign strategy on blaming Israel for every domestic problem we face — and won! asserted
we → roll → problem
They ran a woman, Aber Kawas, who literally sported a Hamas headband and blamed America for 9/11 — and won! asserted
who → run → 9/11
Republicans absolutely rolled out some bad candidates, too. asserted
Republicans → roll → candidates
I was on record in May saying that the “Winner of Paxton-Cornyn Texas Senate primary runoff” was Talarico after Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton defeated Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), handing the radical leftist his best chance to be the first Texas Democrat elected since the 1980s. uncertain
Paxton → say → 1980s
Selecting Vivek Ramaswamy in the Ohio primary was another own goal by Republicans, who leaned into MAGA candidates in an election in which only 25% of voters identified as MAGA. asserted
% → select → MAGA
But if we’re holding a competition for which party nominated the worst candidates, the Democrats win all day. asserted
Democrats → hold → candidates
It simply didn’t matter who was on the ticket for the Left as long as it wasn’t a Republican. asserted
it → matter → Left
It might have helped the GOP in a few states to run better candidates, but this “blue tsunami” was happening regardless. uncertain
tsunami → help → candidates
So why did the Republicans get killed on Tuesday? asserted
Republicans → kill → Tuesday
I’d argue it wasn’t as much a policy issue as it was a marketing one. asserted
it → argue → ?
According to the exit polls, 74% of voters considered the Iran war to be a crucial or major factor. uncertain
war → accord → voters
Under no circumstances can a jihadist dictatorship obtain a nuclear weapon. asserted
dictatorship → obtain → weapon
The public was terrified of Kim Jong Un’s nuclear ambitions a decade ago. asserted
public → terrify → ambitions
The average consumer does not want to spend thousands of dollars for Stranger Things to look and sound better. asserted
Things → want → dollars
Yet people would come in looking to spend $500 on a new TV set and leave with the biggest smiles on their faces after spending $20,000 on a surround-sound system. asserted
people → come → system
What makes someone a good salesman is the ability to demonstrate the value of the product they’re selling. asserted
they → make → product
He spent more time renaming everything from the Gulf of Mexico (America) to artificial (super) intelligence than he did showing the public the value of his Iran war. asserted
he → spend → war
The general public will not see the value on its own until it hits home. asserted
it → see → home
That’s why the public supported World War II after Pearl Harbor or the War on Terror after 9/11. asserted
public → ’ → 9/11
We don’t need another mass-casualty incident for the public to get on board, but people need to understand the real danger of one. asserted
people → need → one
Instead of seeing the crisis Trump averted, if only temporarily, by attacking Iran, the public only saw the cost: high gas prices. asserted
public → see → cost
Any rational person would agree that paying more for gas would be worth it to avoid another Pearl Harbor or 9/11. asserted
paying → agree → Harbor
Trump’s problem was that he never “showed the value,” so to speak. asserted
he → show → value
In other words, he didn’t do enough to make the public take the Iran threat seriously. asserted
public → do → threat
This same problem applies to Trump’s economic and immigration agendas, which I largely agree with, but whose value was not adequately demonstrated to the voting public. asserted
value → apply → public
The other point of failure was policy-related, and it’s that Trump was frankly not strong enough to finish what he started in Iran. asserted
he → relate → Iran
The war should have been over quickly and forcefully, with the terrorist regime toppled. asserted
regime → topple → ?
Instead, Trump took his foot off the gas and rushed to the negotiating table, supposedly at the behest of Vice President JD Vance. asserted
Trump → take → Vance
In chess terms, Trump had the king dead to rights and blundered into a stalemate. asserted
king → have → stalemate
Instead of a swift and resounding victory, those short-term consequences became a war of attrition between the blockaded regime and the American public paying $4 a gallon for gas. asserted
consequences → become → gas
Given the results of the election, it’s safe to say the regime won that battle. asserted
regime → give → battle
Trump said the reason Republicans lost is that he wasn’t on the ballot. asserted
he → say → ballot
He’s dead wrong. asserted
He → ’ → ?
Trump’s ability to sell the public on his agenda was absolutely on the ballot, and Republicans, good and bad candidates alike, paid dearly for it. asserted
Republicans → sell → it
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support