Photo via Washington Examiner

Daily on Energy: How the data center ballot measures fared

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Merino, M., & Patteson, C. (2026, November 4). Daily on Energy: How the data center ballot measures fared. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/daily-on-energy/4793023/daily-on-energy-how-the-data-center-ballot-measures-fared/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-11-04 · by Maydeen Merino, Callie Patteson

Quick Summary

The article reports that in the recent midterm elections, ballot measures limiting or banning data center developments across ten states overwhelmingly passed. Specifically, out of 41 measures tracked by Ballotpedia, only one measure restricting development failed in North Dakota; all others aimed at facilitating data center growth also lost. Notable successes include outright bans in multiple Ohio cities and a strong majority vote against data centers in Alhambra, California (81.84%). Additionally, several jurisdictions are imposing temporary moratoriums on new or expanded data centers.
Written by AI on 2026-11-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Anti-data center ballot measures saw significant victories across the United States in recent midterm elections, with nearly all of them passing in ten states. The Washington Examiner reported on 41 data center measures being tracked, though some results were still pending as of November 4, 2026. These wins reflect growing opposition to large-scale data centers, likely influenced by environmental concerns and local community resistance. Key races in Ohio, among other locations, contributed to this trend, although specific details on the measures and their impacts remain to be fully analyzed post-election.

Written for “Data Center Ballot Measures Results” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Data Center Ballot Measures Results
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
Hedges 0 of 1 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the election results and their implications; one focuses on political landscape changes while the other discusses data center ballot measures.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 27 claims Outlet record 65/100
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 42 claims Outlet record 95/100
“While both articles discuss the midterm elections held on November 2nd and 3rd, they are not describing the exact same incident. Article A provides an overview of the campaign season leading up to the election, while Article B focuses specifically on how ballot measures regarding data centers fared in those elections.”
BBC News
Hedges 2 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterm elections; Article A sets up expectations before election day, while Article B reports on results and immediate aftermath.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Centre further right than this Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Both articles discuss the 2026 midterm elections but focus on different aspects: one on overall control changes and market reactions, while the other specifically covers ballot measures related to data centers.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 29 claims Outlet record 78/100
“The articles cover the general outcome of midterm elections but discuss different aspects and do not focus on the exact same specific incident or ballot measures.”
NBC News
Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 78/100
“Article A covers Election Day preparations and voting on November 3rd, while Article B discusses results and aftermath of the elections on November 4th.”
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the initial results and celebrations during the midterm elections on November 4th, while Article B discusses the aftermath and implications of ballot measures related to data centers following the same election day.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 8 of 108 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss the outcome of the midterm elections, they are focused on different aspects and do not describe the same specific incident.”
Bluenami Different event
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 41 claims Outlet record 67/100
“While both articles discuss the outcome of midterm elections that favored Democrats and mention Elon Musk's spending, they focus on different aspects: Article A emphasizes the overall political shift, while Article B focuses specifically on ballot measures related to data centers.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
80
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
5 of 80 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4256 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Maydeen Merino
38 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 We’ll be watching next week how the flipped chambers may influence immediate issues still before members in the lame-duck session, such as permitting reform.
🔮 In today’s newsletter, we take a closer look at gas prices reaching a new record under President Donald Trump, just as some voters will be driving to the polls today.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · Daily on Energy: Happy Election Day!
🔮 Peak color in and around D.C. is expected to hit closer to next weekend.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Daily on Energy: Permitting reform watch
🔮 There are just four days left until the midterm elections and we will be keeping tabs on several energy and climate-related ballot measures.
🔮 In today’s newsletter, Maydeen spoke with the Missouri Farm Bureau on how farmers are dealing with high fuel costs and whether recent administration actions are translating to lower prices.
🔮 Advancing these projects could be seen as a sign of good faith from the administration that it will fairly implement permitting reform for renewable energy as well as fossil fuel projects (although it is worth noting that doing so was ordered by the courts).
🔮 In a new report Wednesday, the U.N. Environment Programme concluded that it is inevitable that global temperatures will exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels, the target set in the 2015 agreement.
🔮 He will be traveling to some key Senate races, including Kansas, Iowa, North Carolina, and Florida.
🔮 The Trump administration will offer the first-ever offshore mining leases for deep-sea mining off the coast of American Samoa, as part of an effort to bolster the domestic critical mineral supply chain.
🔮 If you don’t have any plans this weekend, the Smithsonian’s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute will be hosting their annual “Boo at the Zoo.”
Also by Maydeen Merino
Daily on Energy: Happy Election Day!
2026-11-03 · Washington Examiner
Daily on Energy: Permitting reform watch
2026-11-02 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 38 articles by Maydeen Merino →
Callie Patteson
37 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 We’ll be watching next week how the flipped chambers may influence immediate issues still before members in the lame-duck session, such as permitting reform.
🔮 Democrats are set to try to reverse the Republican agenda of the past two years, which was to cut funding for wind and solar power while deregulating fossil fuel industries.
🔮 In today’s newsletter, we take a closer look at gas prices reaching a new record under President Donald Trump, just as some voters will be driving to the polls today.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · Daily on Energy: Happy Election Day!
🔮 Peak color in and around D.C. is expected to hit closer to next weekend.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Daily on Energy: Permitting reform watch
🔮 There are just four days left until the midterm elections and we will be keeping tabs on several energy and climate-related ballot measures.
🔮 In today’s newsletter, Maydeen spoke with the Missouri Farm Bureau on how farmers are dealing with high fuel costs and whether recent administration actions are translating to lower prices.
🔮 Advancing these projects could be seen as a sign of good faith from the administration that it will fairly implement permitting reform for renewable energy as well as fossil fuel projects (although it is worth noting that doing so was ordered by the courts).
🔮 He will be traveling to some key Senate races, including Kansas, Iowa, North Carolina, and Florida.
🔮 The Trump administration will use national defense authorities to spend more than $40 million on a controversial gas pipeline project that has been blocked by the state of New York for years.
🔮 If you don’t have any plans this weekend, the Smithsonian’s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute will be hosting their annual “Boo at the Zoo.”
Also by Callie Patteson
Daily on Energy: Happy Election Day!
2026-11-03 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 37 articles by Callie Patteson →

Topics

Harwood Ohio Washington Examiner Wells Wiscasset

Subjects

Ohio GPE · 2× TD Cowen ORG · 2× Wells ORG · 2× Wiscasset GPE · 2× Ballotpedia ORG · 1× Callie Patteson PERSON · 1× Harwood GPE · 1× Maydeen Merino PERSON · 1× North Dakota GPE · 1× Washington Examiner ORG · 1×

Narrative

If signing up doesn’t work, shoot us an email, and we’ll add you to our list. ANTI-DATA CENTER MEASURES WIN BIG AT THE BALLOT BOXES: Last night was a major win for anti-data center ballot measures throughout the country. As part of our midterm coverage, we were tracking 41 data center measures across 10 states that would limit or facilitate AI development. Of the 41 measures, only one of the measures that would restrict development is set to fail, in Harwood, North Dakota.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-04
🔮 We’ll be watching next week how the flipped chambers may influence immediate issues still before members in the lame-duck session, such as permitting reform.
2026-11-04 · Washington Examiner
Daily on Energy: How the data center ballot measures fared · assertive framing

Claims (80 extracted, 5 hedged)

WHAT’S HAPPENING TODAY: asserted
WHAT → happen → ?
We hope you didn’t all stay up too late watching the midterm elections. asserted
you → hope → elections
We’re still waiting for a few races and ballot measures to be called, but those won’t change the blue tsunami that swept the nation last night. asserted
that → wait → nation
We’ll be watching next week how the flipped chambers may influence immediate issues still before members in the lame-duck session, such as permitting reform. uncertain
chambers → watch → reform
Anti-data center measures saw huge wins yesterday, with nearly all of them passing across 10 states. asserted
all → see → states
Keep reading to learn more about the measures that passed. asserted
that → keep → measures
If a friend sent this to you and you’d like to sign up, click here. asserted
you → send → you
If signing up doesn’t work, shoot us an email, and we’ll add you to our list. ANTI-DATA CENTER MEASURES WIN BIG AT THE BALLOT BOXES: Last night was a major win for anti-data center ballot measures throughout the country. As part of our midterm coverage, we were tracking 41 data center measures across 10 states that would limit or facilitate AI development. Of the 41 measures, only one of the measures that would restrict development is set to fail, in Harwood, North Dakota. asserted
that → sign → Harwood
All 13 measures that would facilitate data center development are on track to fail, according to Ballotpedia. uncertain
that → facilitate → Ballotpedia
Ohio localities had 21 measures on ballots. asserted
localities → have → ballots
Several municipalities approved measures that outright ban data center development, such as Urbana, Trenton, Upper Sandusky, and the village of Granville. asserted
that → approve → Granville
Measures to prohibit data centers that exceed 25 megawatts of power usage passed in the cities of Conneaut, Defiance, and Sunbury, and were leading in votes in the city of Oregon. asserted
that → prohibit → Oregon
In Alhambra, California, voters have strongly supported a measure to ban data centers, with the proposal having 81.84% of the vote. asserted
proposal → support → vote
Some jurisdictions are also set to impose moratoriums on data center construction. asserted
jurisdictions → set → construction
For instance, Bloomington, Illinois, passed an initiative that would advise the city to impose a moratorium on large-scale data centers. asserted
that → pass → centers
Wells and Wiscasset, Maine, have also imposed temporary moratoriums on data centers. asserted
Wells → impose → centers
The Wells measure would call for a 180-day pause, while Wiscasset’s measure would impose a six-month moratorium on new or expanded data centers. asserted
measure → call → centers
Texas Democrat Gina Hinojosa, who defeated Republican Gov. Greg Abbott last night, has called for a statewide moratorium on data centers to allow for the passage of legislation to regulate them. asserted
who → defeat → them
Georgia Governor-elect Keisha Lance Bottoms has vowed to impose a pause on data center development. asserted
Bottoms → vow → development
Amy Acton, who won Ohio’s gubernatorial race, has also prioritized reining in data center development, promising to issue guardrails on developments. asserted
who → win → developments
All the rest: WHAT DO LAST NIGHT’S RESULTS MEAN FOR PERMITTING REFORM? asserted
RESULTS → mean → REFORM
Early this morning, analysts with TD Cowen slashed their projected odds of the bipartisan permitting bill passing during the lame-duck session. asserted
bill → slash → session
In a note obtained by Axios, the analysts said last night’s blue tsunami “likely emboldens voices arguing the bill gives too many concessions” to the oil and gas industry. asserted
bill → obtain → industry
As we’ve touched on before, key Democrats in the House, including Natural Resources Committee ranking member Jared Huffman, are calling for negotiations to be pushed to the next Congress. asserted
negotiations → touch → Congress
As a result, TD Cowen said, BAAJA only has a 25% chance of succeeding. asserted
BAAJA → say → chance
But proponents of the bill aren’t giving up hope. asserted
proponents → give → hope
“I think a chamber flip was factored into the negotiation and size of flip doesn’t matter much,” Xan Fishman, executive vice president for energy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, told Callie this morning. asserted
Fishman → think → Callie
“It’s in everyone’s best interest (dems and republicans) to pass the bipartisan deal now.” asserted
It → ’ → deal
Jane Flegal, who worked in climate policy under the Biden administration, shared that sentiment, saying waiting would be a “terrible outcome.” asserted
waiting → work → sentiment
She said passing the bipartisan bill would enable the country to build new infrastructure and energy projects as fast as Texas. asserted
passing → say → Texas
During a press call earlier today, American Clean Power CEO Jason Grumet said permitting reform will be the “first test of Democrats’ willingness to make tough choices…that are needed to actually reduce energy prices.” asserted
that → say → prices
“There are certainly voices who are going to argue that it would be better to wait,” he added. asserted
he → be → ?
“But I think that the understanding in Congress is that this is a really unique opportunity, and if we don’t move forward in the next three or four weeks, it’s hard to imagine a bipartisan effort over the next couple of years.” asserted
it → think → years
SIERRA CLUB RELEASES A LEGISLATIVE BLUEPRINT FOR DEMOCRATS: asserted
CLUB → release → DEMOCRATS
The Sierra Club wasted no time in releasing a legislative policy blueprint for climate change policies this morning, calling on Democrats to “fight for accountability for Trump’s corrupt, pro-polluter policies and invest in an affordable clean energy future.” asserted
Club → waste → future
The group specifically calls for the passage of the Energy Bills Relief Act, or similar legislation, that would restore clean energy tax credits and grants slashed by the One Big Beautiful Bill. asserted
that → call → Bill
The blueprint also calls for guardrails on new data centers, requiring the large-load facilities to be powered by clean energy, not coal or gas; pay taxes on electricity consumption; and pay for their own power. asserted
facilities → call → power
It also asks Democrats to pass legislation that would repeal fossil fuel subsidies and enact a windfall profits tax on the oil and gas industry. asserted
that → ask → industry
Additionally, the Sierra Club is asking the next Congress to strengthen the Roadless Rule, enact protections for the Arctic, and block new offshore drilling. asserted
Club → ask → drilling
You can read the full policy blueprint here. asserted
You → read → blueprint
…and 40 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support