Photo via The Guardian

Datacenters were on the ballot. US voters rejected them

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Bhuiyan, J. (2026, November 5). Datacenters were on the ballot. US voters rejected them. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/nov/04/datacenters-midterm-elections

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-11-05 · by Johana Bhuiyan

Quick Summary

US voters across at least 10 states rejected datacenter projects in Tuesday’s midterm elections, with 40 jurisdictions passing bans or restrictions. In Ohio alone, 14 municipalities banned Amazon's proposed $2 million datacenter project in Sunbury. Other notable rejections occurred in Maine and Kansas. The only exception was Hardwood, North Dakota, where a moratorium failed. Politicians elected on Tuesday also pledged to restrict datacenter development, including Texas’s new governor Gina Hinojosa, who promised greater restrictions and community input. Tech analysts predict this opposition will slow the pace of datacenter buildout over the next two years.
Written by AI on 2026-11-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In the 2026 U.S. midterms, voters overwhelmingly rejected proposals related to AI data centers across 13 states, with only one town out of dozens supporting such measures. In Ohio alone, 21 local ballot initiatives were voted down, reflecting a broader nationwide trend against data center development despite initial industry optimism. The exit polls showed that 56% of voters cited artificial intelligence and data centers as crucial or major factors in their decision-making process, suggesting these issues galvanized voter sentiment against the Republican Party. This outcome is expected to slow AI growth and intensify scrutiny over tech companies like Google and Amazon, with Democrats entering Congress with a mandate to address concerns about data center development.

Written for “Voters Reject Data Centers” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans left for article 130506 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-05

Story

📰 Voters Reject Data Centers
Politics · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 6 of 34 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes an incident during a political debate involving heckling about data centers, while Article B discusses voter outcomes and bans on datacenter development in multiple jurisdictions.”
BBC News
Hedges 3 of 39 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of neocloud firms and datacenters; one focuses on financial debates about their sustainability, while the other covers voter rejection of proposed datacenter developments.”
Semafor
Hedges 1 of 65 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of data centers: one focuses on an investment by EQT in energy assets for AI, while the other reports on voter rejection of data center developments across multiple US jurisdictions.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 2 of 14 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles describe different aspects of public sentiment towards data centers, with Article A discussing OpenAI's plan to rebrand data centers and Article B reporting on voter rejection of data center proposals in the midterms.”
CBC News
Hedges 4 of 31 claims Outlet record 71/100
“Article A discusses economic promises made by companies building AI data centers in Canada, while Article B reports on U.S. voters rejecting data center proposals in various jurisdictions during midterm elections.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 12 of 102 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A describes opposition to a specific data center and solar farm project near Tilney St Lawrence in Norfolk, UK, while Article B discusses voter rejection of data centers across multiple US jurisdictions.”
CBC News
Hedges 1 of 58 claims Outlet record 71/100
“Article A discusses legal action by a First Nation against an AI data center in Canada, while Article B talks about US voters rejecting datacenter proposals in midterm elections.”
Global News
Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 63/100
“Article A discusses the Ontario government's plans regarding AI data centers, while Article B reports on US voters rejecting datacenter proposals in various jurisdictions.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 7 claims Outlet record 59/100
Global News
Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 63/100
“Article A discusses community information sessions about a proposed AI data center in Nova Scotia, while Article B reports on US voters rejecting data centers through local elections.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
20
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
1 of 20 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2073 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Johana Bhuiyan
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The small city of a population of less than 1,000 people voted down a bill that would impose restrictions on datacenter development.
2026-11-05 · assertive framing · Datacenters were on the ballot. US voters rejected them
🔮 “Access to these products will be entirely off for K-12 student accounts until school administrators explicitly turn them on.”
🔮 The company's filing statement contains a 92-page risk factor document in which it acknowledges the dangers that AI poses to society and human beings, and factors that could negatively affect Anthropic's business.
🔮 They are predicting that artificial intelligence tools will expose more fundamental weaknesses in global internet infrastructure in the months to come.
🔮 “So why would I ever turn them over to a bunch of tech companies whose sole motivation is to profit from their time and harvest their data?” The tech worker who feels torn between two worlds I work in tech, specifically in the AI sphere, and honestly I worry about the future that’s going to be there for my kids.
🔮 In a first for Google, the company confirmed that its AI model, Gemini, breached the security of three other companies in May.
🔮 As part of that agreement, the family said they would have been charged a $10m penalty any time they spoke about the accident and Uber’s connection to it.
Also by Johana Bhuiyan
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Johana Bhuiyan →

Topics

Amazon Maine Ohio Republican Sunbury

Subjects

Ives PERSON · 3× Elon Musk PERSON · 2× Ohio GPE · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Texas GPE · 2× Amazon ORG · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Emporio GPE · 1× Maine GPE · 1× Sunbury GPE · 1×

Narrative

“Data centers in space looking pretty appealing right now,” Elon Musk, who poured over $400m into supporting conservative candidates, posted on X. Analyst Dan Ives said the results of the midterms are a clear sign that the pace of datacenter buildout will start to slow down.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 The small city of a population of less than 1,000 people voted down a bill that would impose restrictions on datacenter development.
2026-11-05 · The Guardian
Datacenters were on the ballot. US voters rejected them · assertive framing

Claims (20 extracted, 1 hedged)

Datacenters, the facilities full of semiconductor chips that power artificial intelligence and a host of other online products, were on the ballot in elections in at least 40 jurisdictions across 10 states. asserted
that → power → states
Voters responded with a strong rebuke of the giant buildings, which have has become a symbol of the tech industry and AI. asserted
which → respond → industry
In Ohio alone, at least 14 municipalities passed bans or restrictions on datacenter development, including in Sunbury, where Amazon has proposed a $2m datacenter project. asserted
Amazon → pass → project
In Maine, eight municipalities passed temporary datacenter moratoriums. asserted
municipalities → pass → moratoriums
In Emporio, Kansas, where a 1,000-acre gigawatt-scale datacenter was recently proposed, a ban on high-impact datacenters was approved by voters. asserted
ban → propose → voters
Voters approved nearly every datacenter moratorium that was on the ballot, dozens in total, with one notable exception: Hardwood, North Dakota. asserted
that → approve → exception
The small city of a population of less than 1,000 people voted down a bill that would impose restrictions on datacenter development. asserted
that → vote → development
Where datacenters were not explicitly on the ballot, officials who have pushed back against their development were elected. asserted
who → push → development
In Texas, Democrat Gina Hinojosa, who secured a historical victory as governor on Tuesday night over her Republican opponent, has promised to impose moratoriums on their construction. asserted
who → secure → construction
She has pledged to implement greater restrictions on and community input into whether datacenters can be built. asserted
datacenters → pledge → restrictions
Towards the end of his tenure, Greg Abbott, her Republican opponent, had also tried to capitalize on anti-datacenter sentiment, demanding an end to electricity subsidies for them. asserted
Abbott → try → them
He reversed his previous stance that had welcomed datacenters to the state. asserted
that → reverse → state
Keisha Lance Bottoms, who became governor of Georgia, and Amy Acton, the newly elected governor of Ohio, have also pledged to implement moratoria on the construction of large datacenters. asserted
who → become → datacenters
Anti-datacenter sentiment has grown in the last few months has become a bipartisan issue. asserted
grown → grow → months
In May, Florida governor Ron DeSantis signed a bill imposing strict regulations on large-scale datacenters. uncertain
DeSantis → sign → datacenters
Still, last night’s election solidified the overwhelming opposition to these centers of compute that have come to serve as a stand-in for the ultra wealthy and resource extraction by the AI industry. asserted
that → solidify → industry
“Data centers in space looking pretty appealing right now,” Elon Musk, who poured over $400m into supporting conservative candidates, posted on X. Analyst Dan Ives said the results of the midterms are a clear sign that the pace of datacenter buildout will start to slow down. asserted
pace → look → buildout
“There is no way to sugarcoat that Democrats taking control especially over the Senate will create some major hurdles for AI and tech legislation in the Beltway over the next two years,” Ives said. asserted
Ives → be → years
Ives said he was particularly worried about Hinojosa who is a “known anti-datacenter politician”. asserted
who → say → Hinojosa
“The biggest worry of the night for tech investors and the AI trade was around the state of Texas where 25%-30% of data center gigawatts and capacity will come from,” he said. asserted
he → come → gigawatts
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support