Photo via The Guardian

‘Bring it on’: Pauline Hanson to appeal Mehreen Faruqi racial discrimination ruling in high court

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Canales, S. B. (2026, November 5). ‘Bring it on’: Pauline Hanson to appeal Mehreen Faruqi racial discrimination ruling in high court. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/nov/05/pauline-hanson-to-appeal-mehreen-faruqi-racial-discrimination-ruling-high-court-ntwnfb

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-11-05 · by Sarah Basford Canales

Quick Summary

Pauline Hanson will appeal a ruling against her in Australia’s high court, following the federal court’s decision that her tweet directed at Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi constituted racial discrimination. The case centers on Hanson's comment telling Faruqi to “pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan,” which was found to breach the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA). Both Hanson and Faruqi have commented on the high court’s decision, with Hanson emphasizing freedom of speech and Faruqi stressing the importance of protection against racism.
Written by AI on 2026-11-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The High Court of Australia has granted Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation party, special leave to appeal a 2024 ruling that found her tweet directed at Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi was racist hate speech. The exchange began in 2022 after Faruqi commented on social media about not mourning Queen Elizabeth II as "the leader of a racist empire." Hanson responded with the now-infamous tweet telling Faruqi to “piss off back to Pakistan.” This case is expected to challenge the constitutionality of Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits racial discrimination and vilification. The High Court will determine whether these laws unduly restrict Australia's implied freedom of political communication.

Written for “Pauline Hanson Appeals Racial Discrimination Ruling” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 3 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but all 4 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 130846: attributed speech only · logged 2026-11-05

Story

📰 Pauline Hanson Appeals Racial Discrimination Ruling
Politics · 4 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 67/100
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 61/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
4
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2996 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Sarah Basford Canales
18 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The high court will examine whether Hanson’s comments breached the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA) or if the federal court decision impeded her implied freedom of speech.
🔮 WA police will allege the woman is a former partner of Steele-John.
🔮 A campaign to uncover any documents relating to whether Australian spies bugged Timor-Leste to gain the upper hand in sensitive oil and gas negotiations will be a little less secret after a critical win by the former senator Rex Patrick.
🔮 In question time in early September, the prime minister told the house the money would go toward “an environmental project stopping raw sewage going into the Cooks River during flooding”.
🔮 Jordon Steele-John has confirmed he will not attend parliament next week as the embattled Greens senator releases a letter detailing the allegations against him.
🔮 Only if two-thirds of the party room - or more than seven members - decided to expel him in a secret ballot, would Steele-John have no option but to comply.
🔮 Nine newspapers reported last week that seven party members had demanded an investigation into allegations Steel-John had acted inappropriately towards women between 2017 and 2025. Steele-John, in his Sunday night statement, said he was not on leave, contrary to Shoebridge’s comments last week, and claimed he had been pressured by the leader to request leave on Thursday as Nine’s story was breaking. “I feel that he used those meetings to repeatedly pressure me to say that I would take leave,” Steele-John said on Sunday.
🔮 Steele-John said some of the letter’s authors and signatories may have signed the letter out of “genuine commitment” to people who experienced violence but he was angry it had been politicised.
🔮 Steele-John confirmed he would leave the party room on Thursday after some details of historical complaints about inappropriate comments made to women ranging between 2017 and 2025 were publicly aired in the media.
🔮 The resources minister, Madeleine King, is facing calls to correct her claim in a major speech that all greenhouse gas emissions from developing a massive fossil fuel basin in the Northern Territory will be offset to limit their impact on the climate.
Also by Sarah Basford Canales
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 18 articles by Sarah Basford Canales →

Topics

Australia Greens One Nation Pakistan the Racial Discrimination Act

Subjects

Hanson PERSON · 8× Australia GPE · 5× Faruqi PERSON · 5× Pakistan GPE · 3× Greens ORG · 2× Stewart PERSON · 2× Australians NORP · 1× Mehreen Faruqi PERSON · 1× One Nation ORG · 1× Pauline Hanson’s PERSON · 1×

Narrative

It’s clear you’re not happy, so pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan – PH.” Justice Angus Stewart in November 2024 found Hanson’s tweet was unlawful and portrayed Faruqi as a “second-class citizen” who took advantage of Australia and who, as a migrant to the country, “should be grateful for what she has and keep quiet” – a position he declared to be “exclusionary”.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 The high court will examine whether Hanson’s comments breached the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA) or if the federal court decision impeded her implied freedom of speech.

Claims (28 extracted, 0 hedged)

Australia’s high court has agreed to hear Pauline Hanson’s appeal against a ruling that she engaged in racial discrimination against Mehreen Faruqi when she told the Greens senator to “pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan”. asserted
she → agree → Pakistan
The One Nation leader was granted special leave to appeal on Thursday after the full federal court earlier this year unanimously upheld a 2024 decision. asserted
court → grant → decision
The high court will examine whether Hanson’s comments breached the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA) or if the federal court decision impeded her implied freedom of speech. asserted
decision → examine → speech
Hanson welcomed the decision on social media, saying “this case has always been bigger than me and bigger than one tweet”. asserted
case → welcome → tweet
“Australians must be able to speak their minds, question their government and disagree with each other without being frightened into silence,” the 72-year-old senator wrote. asserted
senator → speak → silence
“That freedom is under attack, including through Labor’s digital duty of care bill and its threat to lawful debate online.” asserted
freedom → include → debate
Faruqi said in a statement on Thursday: “Bring it on.” asserted
Faruqi → say → it
“This has been a long, hard road walked alongside everyone who has been targeted by racism. asserted
who → walk → racism
We won’t be backing down now,” the Greens senator wrote. asserted
senator → back → ?
“The highest court in Australia can now determine once and for all that people in this country are protected against racism. asserted
people → determine → racism
People of colour, migrants and Muslims deserve to feel safe in the place they call home. asserted
they → deserve → place
In times like these where we are being attacked and demonised, our legal system must be able to provide protection against vilification.” asserted
system → attack → vilification
A spokesperson for the federal attorney general, Michelle Rowland, said section 18C of the RDA was more important to Australia’s social cohesion “than ever”. asserted
section → say → cohesion
“As the matter is before the court, it would be inappropriate to comment further,” the spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → comment → court
“The Australian government’s position is clear: there is no place for racism or racial hatred in our society.” asserted
position → be → society
The dispute arose in 2022 after the death of Queen Elizabeth II. asserted
dispute → arise → II
Faruqi tweeted: “Condolences to those who knew the Queen. asserted
who → tweet → Queen
I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples. asserted
I → mourn → peoples
We are reminded of the urgency of Treaty with First Nations, justice & reparations for British colonies & becoming a republic.” asserted
We → remind → colonies
In response, Hanson posted: “Your attitude appalls and disgusts me. asserted
attitude → post → me
When you immigrated to Australia you took every advantage of this country. asserted
you → immigrate → country
You took citizenship, bought multiple homes, and a job in a parliament. asserted
You → take → parliament
It’s clear you’re not happy, so pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan – PH.” Justice Angus Stewart in November 2024 found Hanson’s tweet was unlawful and portrayed Faruqi as a “second-class citizen” who took advantage of Australia and who, as a migrant to the country, “should be grateful for what she has and keep quiet” – a position he declared to be “exclusionary”. asserted
he → ’ → what
Stewart found Hanson’s comment that Faruqi should “piss off back to Pakistan” was a “variant of the slogan ‘go back to from where you came from’”, which he said was a “racist trope” and a “strong form of racism”. asserted
he → find → racism
He added that Hanson’s tweet, given her profile, likely “empowered others” to make similar or worse comments. asserted
tweet → add → comments
The judge rejected Hanson’s arguments, including that Faruqi’s tweet on the queen’s death justified her response. asserted
tweet → reject → response
He found Hanson’s tweet did not fall within the fair comment exemption because it was an “angry, personal attack”. asserted
it → find → exemption
Stewart’s judgment was unanimously upheld in July this year by the three federal court judges Melissa Perry, Geoffrey Kennett and Elizabeth Bennett. asserted
judgment → uphold → judges
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support