Photo via The Intercept

“Dead Man Walking”: Officials Say Hegseth Has to Go

Read the original at The Intercept ↗
Cite

Turse, N. (2026, November 5). “Dead Man Walking”: Officials Say Hegseth Has to Go. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2026/11/05/midterms-hegseth-impeach-pressure-massie-military/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Intercept · collected 2026-11-05 · by Nick Turse

Quick Summary

After Democrats won control of both chambers in the midterm elections, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faces potential impeachment for his actions over the past two years, including withholding information from Congress and purging military leaders who oppose him. Lawmakers like Rep. Hakeem Jeffries and Rep. Rosa DeLauro are calling for Hegseth's removal, citing his contemptuous attitude towards bipartisan efforts and his role in the Iran war failure. Republican Rep. Thomas Massie plans to introduce eight articles of impeachment against Hegseth with expected Democratic support, while Pentagon officials speculate about potential replacements given the political pressure and internal discontent.
Written by AI on 2026-11-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 5, 2026, Pete Hegseth, the U.S. Defense Secretary, faces increasing pressure following Republican midterm election losses attributed to his advocacy for the ongoing war with Iran. President Trump initially stood by Hegseth, stating he is "doing a very good job," but insiders predict Trump might reconsider due to mounting criticism. Democrats plan to target Hegseth in Congress, with Representative Robert Garcia calling for investigations and former Navy admiral Nancy Lacore aiming to hold him accountable. Criticism also stems from Hegseth's role in military leadership purges and the civilian deaths caused by a strike on an elementary school in Minab, Iran, which killed over 150 civilians.

Written for “Hegseth Faces Impeachment Threats” on 2026-11-06, grounded in this article and the 17 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 132431 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-05

Story

📰 Hegseth Faces Impeachment Threats
Politics · 18 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 6 of 30 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different developments regarding Pete Hegseth's position as Defense Secretary on the same day, one reporting Trump's support and the other detailing growing opposition from lawmakers.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 69/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 7 of 48 claims Outlet record 60/100
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 4 of 38 claims Outlet record 68/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles describe different stages of Pete Hegseth's situation following the midterm elections, not a single specific incident.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 14 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles discuss Pete Hegseth's position and potential fall from grace following Republican midterm losses, they describe different aspects: Article A focuses on Hegseth taking responsibility for the war in Iran, while Article B discusses possible impeachment due to his treatment of lawmakers.”
ABC News (US)
Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 67/100
“While both articles discuss the current situation surrounding Pete Hegseth and speculation about his future, they focus on different aspects: Article A is specifically about Trump's intention to keep Hegseth, while Article B discusses broader political challenges and potential impeachment.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 6 of 40 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Pete Hegseth's situation — one focuses on Trump's stance towards keeping him, while the other discusses his increasing problems and potential impeachment within the Pentagon and Capitol Hill.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss pressure on Pete Hegseth to leave his position, Article A focuses on Trump's consideration of firing him and public support, while Article B emphasizes the political fallout following a midterm election defeat.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
158
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
15 of 158 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
97/100
The Intercept's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
18
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Intercept · 161 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Nick Turse
10 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “LAWYER UP,” Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, posted on X. Both will be joined in the House by Democrat Nancy Lacore, a former Navy admiral who was fired by Hegseth, who declared victory in a traditionally red district in South Carolina.
2026-11-05 · assertive framing · “Dead Man Walking”: Officials Say Hegseth Has to Go
🔮 The United States will stop providing $4 billion in annual aid to Israel starting next year, President Donald Trump claimed in an Election Day interview.
🔮 A U.S. official described the threat as a “sophisticated plot to attack” Royal Air Force Fairford air base with “multiple drones” that could have turned into a military and public relations nightmare.
🔮 The officials would not say if Marines have been stationed on commercial vessels transiting the Strait.
🔮 Also missing is Sgt. Devin Seibel who died in Irbil, Iraq, on May 31 in a training accident, according to a military press release.
🔮 One cautioned that this stress could lead to a “breakdown” in the military’s ability to effectively continue a war that President Donald Trump said would end in early April.
🔮 Bin Laden’s plan was to trap the U.S. in expensive, foreign quagmire wars that would trigger a domestic economic collapse.
2026-09-11 · assertive framing · Osama Bin Laden Won
🔮 The strikes may also constitute crimes against humanity, violating fundamental rights to life and due process.
🔮 Last week, the Air Force also began looking into local firms that could fulfill a wide-ranging contract — including “mortuary services” — at Italy’s Aviano Air Base, a key hub for the war with Iran.
2026-08-26 · assertive framing · Sixty More U.S. Soldiers Reported Injured in Iran War
🔮 The CENTCOM official who revealed the existence of the list threatened that this reporter could be added to it for calling the command too often.
Also by Nick Turse
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by Nick Turse →

Topics

Capitol Hill House Iran Pentagon U.S.

Subjects

Hegseth PERSON · 12× Pentagon ORG · 7× Capitol Hill ORG · 3× House ORG · 3× Pete Hegseth PERSON · 3× Democrat NORP · 2× Iran GPE · 2× U.S. GPE · 2× Democratic NORP · 1× FORTRESS America ORG · 1×

Narrative

Since then, Hegseth has been under perpetual fire for his purge of top military leaders — many of them women and minorities; an inability to defeat Yemen’s Houthis in 2025 or win the Iran war in 2026; a strike on an elementary school in Minab, Iran, that killed more than 150 civilians, most of them children; his campaign of extrajudicial killings in attacks on so-called drug boats; overlapping efforts to weaken transparency, scuttle accountability, hobble military justice, and undercut protections for civilians in conflict; openly advocating for offering enemies “no quarter,” a war crime; his installation of a Pentagon makeup studio at taxpayer expense; an unnatural and immature fixation with violence; an obsession with troops’ testosterone levels, a censorship campaign that replaced the Pentagon press corps with cheerleading influencers, among other distractions, dysfunctions, and tantrums.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 “LAWYER UP,” Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, posted on X. Both will be joined in the House by Democrat Nancy Lacore, a former Navy admiral who was fired by Hegseth, who declared victory in a traditionally red district in South Carolina.
2026-11-05 · The Intercept
“Dead Man Walking”: Officials Say Hegseth Has to Go · assertive framing

Claims (158 extracted, 15 hedged)

In the run-up to the midterm election, seen by many as a referendum on the Iran war, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth unveiled FORTRESS America — a project to allow U.S. military bases to survive a 90-day siege. asserted
bases → see → siege
But following the landslide Democratic victory, it’s Hegseth who finds himself increasingly besieged within his own fortress, the Pentagon, and on Capitol Hill where he stands on the brink of bipartisan impeachment. asserted
he → follow → impeachment
In the wake of an election rout that handed Democrats firm control of the House and the Senate, Hegseth is in the crosshairs of lawmakers whom he has treated with contempt for two years, as he has withheld basic information from Congress and purged bipartisan-backed senior military leaders. asserted
he → hand → leaders
“One of the first things we’re going to do in the majority, we’re going to run Pete Hegseth out of town,” Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., who is now in line to be speaker of the House, announced at a campaign rally just before Election Day. asserted
who → go → Day
Asked about the self-styled War Secretary on Wednesday, Jeffries replied: “Is Pete Hegseth still around?” asserted
Hegseth → ask → Wednesday
As the blue wave crested on Tuesday, storm clouds stacked up on Hegseth’s horizon. asserted
clouds → crest → horizon
“We’re going to go after Hegseth,” Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., in line to return to the helm of the powerful House Appropriations Committee, announced after cruising to victory on Tuesday. asserted
DeLauro → go → Tuesday
“LAWYER UP,” Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, posted on X. Both will be joined in the House by Democrat Nancy Lacore, a former Navy admiral who was fired by Hegseth, who declared victory in a traditionally red district in South Carolina. asserted
who → lawyer → Carolina
By Wednesday evening, sentiment within the Pentagon suggested that Hegseth’s days are numbered, with names of potential replacements already being bandied about. uncertain
names → suggest → replacements
“Dead man walking,” said one official. asserted
official → walk → ?
A former defense official agreed: “They pinned the failure in Iran on him. asserted
They → agree → him
Now it’s only a matter of time.” asserted
it → ’ → time
Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, with support from Democrats, is slated to take aim at Hegseth as soon as next week with eight articles of impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors. asserted
Massie → slat → crimes
With Hegseth increasingly under fire within the ranks, at the Pentagon, and on Capitol Hill, and with rumors swirling that the White House may cut him loose in the face of the staggering electoral defeat, The Intercept spoke with six current and former defense officials as well as additional sources on Capitol Hill, most on the condition of anonymity in order to speak freely. uncertain
Intercept → swirl → anonymity
Hegseth has, they said, undermined the rule of law; irreparably harmed the U.S. military through purges of top commanders and those who refuse to pledge fealty; pursued relentless leak investigations; spurred religious extremism; and diminished the department he leads due to an almost endless raft of scandals, culture-war clownishness, and senseless policies. asserted
he → say → scandals
One of the officials, Wes J. Bryant — until last year a senior targeting adviser and policy analyst at the Pentagon — gave voice to Massie’s more technical articles of impeachment which indict Hegseth for extrajudicial killings and waging unlawful war, among other crimes. asserted
which → target → crimes
“He is conducting state terrorism. asserted
He → conduct → terrorism
He needs to be prosecuted,” said Bryant, who was pushed out of his Pentagon job for blowing the whistle on Hegseth’s efforts to undermine protections for civilians. asserted
who → need → civilians
Hegseth — a former Army National Guard officer turned Fox News host turned secretary of war — came into office amid a firestorm of scandal from his confirmation process, including a swirl of allegations of financial mismanagement at veterans’ nonprofits where he once worked, excessive drinking and public drunkenness, marital infidelity, and sexual assault. asserted
he → turn → nonprofits
His reign at the Pentagon has been no less tumultuous and marked by a string of appalling episodes of both major importance and more symbolic disgrace, beginning with Signal-gate — the texting of secret war plans that put troops in harm’s way — and follow-on digital security lapses. asserted
that → mark → way
The Pentagon’s own inspector general concluded last December that “Hegseth violated security protocols and endangered U.S. troops and objectives by using a personal device to share sensitive operational details on the unclassified messaging app Signal.” asserted
Hegseth → conclude → app
Those scandals, however, turned out to be the high point of his tenure. asserted
scandals → turn → tenure
Since then, Hegseth has been under perpetual fire for his purge of top military leaders — many of them women and minorities; an inability to defeat Yemen’s Houthis in 2025 or win the Iran war in 2026; a strike on an elementary school in Minab, Iran, that killed more than 150 civilians, most of them children; his campaign of extrajudicial killings in attacks on so-called drug boats; overlapping efforts to weaken transparency, scuttle accountability, hobble military justice, and undercut protections for civilians in conflict; openly advocating for offering enemies “no quarter,” a war crime; his installation of a Pentagon makeup studio at taxpayer expense; an unnatural and immature fixation with violence; an obsession with troops’ testosterone levels, a censorship campaign that replaced the Pentagon press corps with cheerleading influencers, among other distractions, dysfunctions, and tantrums. asserted
that → defeat → distractions
Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson and other top spokespersons did not respond to detailed questions and repeated requests for comment. asserted
Wilson → respond → comment
In April, Rep. Yassamin Ansari, D-Ariz., filed six articles of impeachment against Hegseth, including violations of the law of armed conflict and targeting of civilians, abuse of power, and obstructing congressional oversight. asserted
Ansari → file → oversight
“Impeach Pete Hegseth,” Ansari wrote in a quote tweet of a Hegseth post on X on Wednesday. asserted
Ansari → impeach → Wednesday
In September, Massie was poised to force a vote to impeach Hegseth on eight charges. asserted
Massie → poise → charges
As the initiative gained bipartisan momentum, House Speaker Mike Johnson decided to punt and dismissed members of the House before the scheduled vote. asserted
Johnson → gain → vote
But Massie, who was defeated in a GOP primary in May — the most expensive House primary in history — remains committed to ousting Hegseth and plans to force a vote on the measure. uncertain
who → defeat → measure
“I give it better than a 50 percent chance of passing,” Massie told Roll Call just prior to Election Day, expressing confidence that all Democrats and some Republicans would join his effort. asserted
Democrats → give → effort
On Wednesday night, Massie took to X to double down on his commitment. asserted
Massie → take → commitment
“There is one contingency in which I won’t reintroduce the articles of impeachment,” he wrote. asserted
he → be → impeachment
“Hegseth resigns.” asserted
Hegseth → resign → ?
Massie’s office did not return a request for comment. asserted
office → return → comment
In the wake of Tuesday’s stunning electoral landslide, a senior Hill staffer told The Intercept that he believed mounting anger might cause top outgoing Republicans to vote to impeach Hegseth. uncertain
Republicans → tell → Hegseth
“There are very angry senior Republicans in the national security space who honestly pin a lot of their election losses on him. asserted
who → be → him
They are furious,” he said. asserted
he → say → ?
“They need some place to put their anger. asserted
They → need → anger
So they’re asking themselves, ‘What is even the harm in voting to impeach Hegseth?” asserted
they → ask → Hegseth
“Democratic leadership wants to focus on people’s everyday lives and affordability, not impeaching Hegseth. asserted
leadership → want → Hegseth
…and 118 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support