Photo via Fox News

Human vs ChatGPT NFL Week 9 betting picks: Fading the hype after a week both want to forget

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Zaksheske, D. (2026, November 5). Human vs ChatGPT NFL Week 9 betting picks: Fading the hype after a week both want to forget. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/outkick-sports/human-vs-chatgpt-nfl-week-9-betting-picks-fading-hype-week-both-want-forget

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-11-05 · by Dan Zaksheske

Quick Summary

This article compares NFL Week 9 betting picks between a human analyst and ChatGPT. Both faced losses in Week 8; the human went 0-5 while ChatGPT achieved one win but four losses. For Week 9, the human's strategy involves fading recent hype, focusing on underdogs like the Carolina Panthers (+3) against Denver Broncos and Seattle Seahawks (-8½) over Detroit Lions. The article presents odds for these picks with no bet priced worse than -120.
Written by AI on 2026-11-06, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 5, 2026, Dan Zaksheske and ChatGPT are moving on from their Week 8 NFL betting results, which were entirely unsuccessful for both. Neither wants to dwell on the previous week's outcomes: Zaksheske was 0-5 in bets with a loss of 5.81 units, while ChatGPT did not provide specific details but implied similar poor performance. They are now focusing on Week 9 betting picks, choosing from odds priced no worse than -120, aiming for better results this week.

Written for “Human Vs Chat Gpt NFL Picks” on 2026-11-06, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 132876 · logged 2026-11-06

Story

📰 Human Vs Chat Gpt NFL Picks
Sports · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
104
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
4 of 104 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6876 article(s) · 14 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 14 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Dan Zaksheske
57 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 So maybe the Week 8 NFL slate didn’t get my undivided attention.
🔮 Salao's initial report also said that if the preliminary Game 7 number held, it would be the most-watched regular-season or postseason WNBA game since 1997.
🔮 Gabby Williams scored 28 of her 30 points in the second half and was named Finals MVP.
🔮 Golden State guard Gabby Williams delivered the performance Atlanta needed from its star.
🔮 Not even a radically left-wing church choir could get the players to stand on the court for two minutes during the anthem.
🔮 The WNBA expanded to best-of-seven in 2025, and this year's Game 5 began with the series tied 2-2, so neither team could clinch the title.
🔮 Indianapolis’ passing struggles, Jacksonville’s strong run defense and forecast wind support a limited Colts contribution.
🔮 Their shooting also ensured that the WNBA’s championship would be decided in prime time.
🔮 For one man attending with a female Dream fan, the question was more complicated. Asked whether he considered the absences disrespectful, he said, "Me personally, maybe a little bit."
🔮 Hayes, who said he lives in Florida, could make the early start work, but he expressed concern for the people who couldn’t.
Also by Dan Zaksheske
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 57 articles by Dan Zaksheske →

Topics

Baltimore Ravens Carolina Panthers Denver Broncos Indianapolis Colts NFL

Subjects

NFL ORG · 5× Dan ORG · 4× Carolina Panthers ORG · 3× Denver Broncos ORG · 3× Panthers ORG · 3× Seattle Seahawks ORG · 3× Baltimore Ravens ORG · 2× Indianapolis Colts ORG · 2× Jacksonville Jaguars ORG · 2× Los Angeles Chargers ORG · 2×

Narrative

Onward and upward. But if I did want to talk about it, which I don’t, I’d probably mention that I spent more than two weeks on the road, flying back and forth between Atlanta and San Francisco to cover the WNBA Finals.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-06
🔮 So maybe the Week 8 NFL slate didn’t get my undivided attention.

Claims (104 extracted, 4 hedged)

Neither I nor ChatGPT wants to talk about last week. asserted
I → want → week
Luckily for me and it, I’m in control. asserted
I → ’m → control
So, if I say we’re not talking about it, we’re not talking about it, OK? asserted
we → say → it
Onward and upward. But if I did want to talk about it, which I don’t, I’d probably mention that I spent more than two weeks on the road, flying back and forth between Atlanta and San Francisco to cover the WNBA Finals. asserted
I → want → Finals
So maybe the Week 8 NFL slate didn’t get my undivided attention. asserted
slate → get → attention
But, like I said, I don’t want to talk about it. asserted
I → say → it
It’s time for Week 9. asserted
It → ’ → Week
Both of us get five selections from the same odds board, with no bet priced worse than -120. asserted
bet → get → -120
Odds were captured Thursday at 3 p.m. ET. asserted
Odds → capture → ET
Stakes are adjusted so every winning bet produces one unit of profit. asserted
bet → adjust → profit
For example, -110 requires risking 1.10 units, while +110 requires approximately 0.91 units. asserted
+110 → require → units
A push returns the stake and counts as zero units. asserted
push → return → units
I told you I’m not talking about it. asserted
I → tell → it
I told you, we’re not talking about it. asserted
we → tell → it
Since starting 4-0 on these trademarked bets, I've lost three in a row. asserted
I → start → row
I think I've been forcing these, so I'm going to stop doing that. asserted
I → think → that
After last week, it’s time to get back to basics and back to my style of picking games. asserted
it → ’ → games
That means fading what we saw most recently. asserted
we → mean → what
If everyone suddenly loves a team because of what it did last week, I’m probably looking at the other side. asserted
I → love → side
Dan’s analysis: Everyone is back on the fraudulent Denver Broncos after a lucky win over the Kansas City Chiefs, aided by yet another controversial penalty that benefited Sean Payton’s team. asserted
that → aid → team
With all that in mind, I expected this spread to be much larger. asserted
spread → expect → mind
When I saw the Panthers sitting as just two- to three-point underdogs, it made me suspicious. asserted
me → see → underdogs
My gut says the books want people to take Denver, which doesn’t surprise me since the Broncos are overrated. asserted
Broncos → say → me
That’s exactly why we’re taking the Panthers. asserted
we → ’ → Panthers
GPT’s analysis: Carolina’s extra rest and defensive coaching change give the Panthers a plausible bounce-back case. asserted
rest → give → case
My concern is an offensive line that allowed 11 sacks over its last two games facing Denver’s pass rush. asserted
that → allow → rush
That protection matchup pushed me toward the Broncos, although taking the full field goal provides protection: a three-point defeat returns the stake. asserted
defeat → push → stake
Dan’s analysis: Generally, I don’t like laying big numbers like this. asserted
I → like → this
But I’m making an exception because there’s some hype around the Cardinals after Gardner Minshew led them to a come-from-behind overtime victory over Dallas. asserted
Minshew → make → Dallas
Minshew is a journeyman backup for a reason, and I think Seattle’s defense is going to force him into some big mistakes. asserted
defense → think → mistakes
Drew Lock is expected to start for Seattle, and he already threw three touchdowns against the Cardinals earlier this season in a 31-7 win. asserted
he → expect → win
I have a feeling the Seahawks want to make a statement after their embarrassing Monday Night Football performance against Chicago. asserted
Seahawks → have → Chicago
Seattle’s defense gives it a credible route to controlling this game, and Drew Lock has already played well against Arizona this season. asserted
Lock → give → Arizona
My concern is asking for a nine-point victory with Sam Darnold out and Lock managing an elbow injury. asserted
Lock → ask → injury
Arizona’s defensive weaknesses create opportunities, but Seattle’s quarterback uncertainty kept this outside my five. 3. asserted
uncertainty → create → 3
The 49ers have quietly been having all sorts of turnover issues, and it finally caught up to them in their last game, a loss to Atlanta before their bye. asserted
it → have → bye
The Raiders are tied for third in the NFL with 13 takeaways this season. asserted
Raiders → tie → takeaways
All it takes is one or two big turnovers, and the Raiders could not only keep this game close but possibly win outright. uncertain
Raiders → take → game
I don’t have the stones to bet the Las Vegas moneyline, but I could see them keeping this within a score. uncertain
them → have → score
Kirk Cousins gives Las Vegas a credible passing attack and a way to cover late, while San Francisco’s offensive injury concerns strengthen the underdog case. asserted
concerns → give → case
…and 64 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support