Photo via New York Post

America’s bipartisan hatefest is doing China and Russia’s dirty work for free

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Syed, M. (2026, November 6). America’s bipartisan hatefest is doing China and Russia’s dirty work for free. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/11/05/opinion/americas-bipartisan-hatefest-is-doing-china-and-russias-dirty-work-for-free/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-11-06 · by Matthew Syed

Quick Summary

The article critiques the current state of American politics as a cycle of increasing extremism fueled by both major political parties. It highlights record-breaking spending on negative advertising during recent elections and discusses how policy decisions have driven further polarization, such as the Democratic push for social reforms leading to backlash that benefited former President Trump’s agenda, which in turn spurred more radical responses from Democrats. The author argues that this escalating political conflict benefits authoritarian nations like China and Russia by weakening democratic institutions and norms in the U.S., and criticizes social media platforms for amplifying these dynamics through algorithms designed to prioritize sensational content over balanced dialogue.
Written by AI on 2026-11-06, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 6, 2026, Matthew Syed argues in the New York Post that America's political climate has become highly polarized between Democrats and Republicans, with both sides engaging in extreme tactics. The article highlights a record $11.21 billion spent on negative advertising during recent elections, illustrating the extent of this polarization. Syed contends that this trend is harmful to American democracy, as it distracts from constructive policy-making and fosters an environment where extremism thrives. He points to specific instances such as the "woke overreach" by Democrats followed by former President Trump's denial of election results and pardoning those who assaulted law enforcement officers, exemplifying the mutual exacerbation of radical politics on both sides.

Written for “America's Bipartisan Hatefest” on 2026-11-06, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 133490 (high confidence, 8 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-06

Story

📰 America's Bipartisan Hatefest
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 46 claims Outlet record 61/100
“While both articles discuss high spending and negative advertising in the US midterm elections, they do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
43
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
3 of 43 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 17584 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Matthew Syed
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It’s about a great nation being dragged from its ethical moorings by the excesses of one side feeding the excesses of the other in a bizarre waltz that will astound future historians.
🔮 They promised us that social media would connect the world.
🔮 You will remember in the aftermath of 9/11 how many “progressives” insisted that these iniquities were caused by American foreign policy, or western colonialism, or the one Jewish state.
Also by Matthew Syed
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

American Democrats MAGA Republicans Washington

Subjects

American NORP · 4× MAGA ORG · 3× Washington GPE · 3× Democratic NORP · 2× Democrats NORP · 2× Decoy Dan PERSON · 1× Dems NORP · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× Vivek Ramaswamy’s PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Sure, the democratic socialists pose a risk to the American way of life, but they have momentum only because of the extremism that has wrenched political debate away from the patriots and rationalists that have always existed on both sides, and hopefully always will.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-06
🔮 It’s about a great nation being dragged from its ethical moorings by the excesses of one side feeding the excesses of the other in a bizarre waltz that will astound future historians.

Claims (43 extracted, 3 hedged)

A metaphor for a nation that has the strongest economy in the world, and the most dynamic private sector, but a political class who have lost their minds. asserted
who → have → minds
Look at Vivek Ramaswamy’s deployment of the mother of an opponent who was abused as a child. asserted
who → look → child
It’s about a great nation being dragged from its ethical moorings by the excesses of one side feeding the excesses of the other in a bizarre waltz that will astound future historians. asserted
that → ’ → historians
I mean, look at how every election over the last decade and more has been a vote not for anything constructive but against whatever lunacy has been enacted in the asylum called Washington. asserted
lunacy → mean → asylum
We had the woke overreach of the Dems in which biological men became women, leading to the first MAGA wave of Trump — a president who later denied the result of a free election and pardoned those who assaulted law-enforcement officers. asserted
who → have → officers
The Democrats under Biden thought the best way to deal with this lurch was to throw open the borders, a position supported by nobody except those whose minds have been deranged by progressive ideology. asserted
minds → think → ideology
This, in turn, created the conditions for Trump 2.0: a tariff-hiking, Iran-invading, crony-enriching spasm — which has now birthed perhaps the most radical Democratic slate in history. asserted
which → create → history
Newton said that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. asserted
Newton → say → action
American politics is offering a new twist: for every insanity there is an ever more extremist version on the other side. asserted
politics → offer → side
I have no doubt that social media sits near the epicenter of this dynamic, even if not explaining it fully. asserted
media → have → it
The mathematical structure of these algorithms mirrors almost perfectly the gyrating psychosis in American politics. asserted
structure → mirror → politics
Grifters on the MAGA right know that by making ever more incendiary claims they will gain virality, inciting the more extreme hyperliberals to respond in turn, transforming the middle ground into the political equivalent of no-man’s-land. uncertain
they → know → land
And who is celebrating this carnage? asserted
who → celebrate → carnage
That’s right: China, Russia, North Korea and the rest of the democracy-hating totalitarian axis. asserted
That → ’ → axis
This is why their growing army of bots keep inflaming the hostilities and stoking conspiracy theories. asserted
army → grow → theories
The old communists of the Soviet Union used to call their naïve Western supporters “useful idiots.” asserted
communists → use → supporters
It’s the perfect phrase when you look at the army of keyboard warriors making ever more wild claims about their fellow Americans — Josh Turek is a communist, J.D. Vance is a fascist. uncertain
Vance → ’ → Americans
But most definitely a way of monetizing YouTube if you are a charlatan like Candace Owens or Hasan Piker, who will demonize almost anyone for clicks. asserted
who → monetize → clicks
Both have lost all contact with perhaps the most important value in a free society: truth. asserted
Both → lose → society
The wokesters equate feelings with facts while the MAGA ultras think that by saying something often and loudly enough — we won in 2020! — people will believe them. asserted
people → equate → them
The American people smell bulls–t. But there’s a golden opportunity here. asserted
people → smell → bulls
America has a strong economy, even if inflamed with high prices. asserted
America → have → prices
Growth at 3.4% is something Europe would die for. asserted
Europe → die → %
This dynamism is being driven not by Washington, but in spite of it. asserted
dynamism → drive → it
It is down to the people who actually go out and do things, rather than sitting on social media inflaming things. asserted
who → go → things
Just think how much stronger the American economy would be if Washington were not so deranged, distracted and corrupt. asserted
Washington → think → ?
And this is why it’s time for both sides to end the madness by calling out the loons on their own side. asserted
sides → ’ → side
I kept hearing from Democrats before the 2024 election that if Trump won, it would be the last election in America — because if his party lost in 2026, he would instantly deny the result and send in ICE, the military or perhaps an AI robot army. asserted
he → hear → ICE
This isn’t analysis; it is Russian bot-fueled paranoia. asserted
it → fuel → ?
But I heard the same nonsense from MAGA, too. asserted
I → hear → MAGA
That if the Dems win the midterms, the nation will no longer be America. asserted
nation → win → midterms
Sure, the democratic socialists pose a risk to the American way of life, but they have momentum only because of the extremism that has wrenched political debate away from the patriots and rationalists that have always existed on both sides, and hopefully always will. asserted
that → pose → sides
This is what China fears most, by the way. asserted
China → fear → way
An America whose eyes are trained not on conspiracy, deceit and ephemera but the true enemies of freedom. asserted
eyes → train → freedom
An America that rids itself of bad-faith attacks — whether red on blue or blue on red — and glimpses something far more important: the greatness of red, white and blue. asserted
that → rid → red
This indispensable nation that soars highest with some degree of bipartisan consensus across the aisle. asserted
that → soar → aisle
I’ve mentioned the autocratic axis a couple of times, and you may be wondering why nations so far away matter. uncertain
nations → mention → times
Well, permit me to note that the phone in your pocket was likely assembled in China, by a regime that can shut factories at will. asserted
that → permit → will
Beijing’s hackers, US officials say, already lurk in the networks that run our power, water and transport, and have broken into the carriers handling our calls. asserted
that → lurk → calls
These regimes answer to no voters, no courts, no free press. asserted
regimes → answer → voters
…and 3 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support