Photo via The Daily Wire

The Shocking Math Behind The Midterm Disaster

Read the original at The Daily Wire ↗
Cite

Girdusky, R. (2026, November 7). The Shocking Math Behind The Midterm Disaster. The Daily Wire. https://www.dailywire.com/news/the-shocking-math-behind-the-midterm-disaster

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Daily Wire · collected 2026-11-08 · by Ryan Girdusky

Quick Summary

This article is a monologue discussing the Republican Party's performance in the midterm elections, focusing on the significant swing towards Democratic candidates and analyzing voter behavior, particularly among young people and Latino voters. The author notes that young voters shifted 33 points toward Democrats, while Latino voters moved 29 points in their favor. Additionally, the article highlights how younger and lower-income Latino voters were more inclined to support Democrats compared to older or higher-income Latinos.
Written by AI on 2026-11-09, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 7, 2026, Ryan Girdusky published an analysis on The Daily Wire criticizing the Republican Party's performance in the midterm elections. Girdusky emphasizes the need for Republicans to address core issues rather than seeking comfortable explanations for their electoral losses. He references liberal outlet Vox and discusses how amendments passed in blue states like Colorado prohibit biological males from female spaces, a stance that Girdusky questions whether 50% of current Democratic Congress members would support. The analysis highlights the disconnect between voter priorities and party policies, particularly focusing on immigration and economic concerns as key issues for voters.

Written for “Midterm Election Results Analysis” on 2026-11-09, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

Midterm Election Results Analysis
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Leans left Hedges 8 of 108 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the midterms' aftermath and analysis, not the same specific event.”
Toronto Star
Leans left Hedges 3 of 52 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterm elections and their aftermath, not the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterm elections, with Article A focusing on Democratic gains and a general analysis, while Article B focuses on Republican losses and introspection. They have distinct perspectives and publication dates indicating separate analyses.”
CBS News
Hedges 3 of 50 claims Outlet record 68/100
“While both articles discuss Republican losses in the midterms, they describe different aspects and times of analysis around the election outcome.”
The Hindu
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 2 of 11 claims Outlet record 78/100
“Article A reports on the immediate aftermath and results of the midterm election, while Article B presents a retrospective analysis and commentary regarding the same election's impact.”
The Bulwark
Leans left Hedges 1 of 4 claims
“While both articles discuss significant Republican losses in a midterm election, they describe different analyses and perspectives on the event.”
The Guardian
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 6 of 97 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of midterm elections and do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
The Guardian
Leans left Hedges 6 of 36 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterm elections' outcomes and reactions, not a single specific incident.”
Global News
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 50 claims Outlet record 63/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the midterm elections and their aftermath, with Article A focusing on voter sentiment as reported by a poll, while Article B appears to be commentary and analysis following the election results.”
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 67 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles cover different aspects of the Republican reaction to the midterm election results, with Article A reporting immediate anger towards Trump and Article B providing a later analysis and call for change.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
146
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
8 of 146 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
95/100
The Daily Wire's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-09 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Daily Wire · 52 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Ryan Girdusky
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Challenge yourself and hope to meet the moment because that will lead to a better Republican Party, a conservative movement willing to address the issues.
2026-11-08 · assertive framing · The Shocking Math Behind The Midterm Disaster
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Colorado Democrats Latinos Republican Party Vox

Subjects

Latinos NORP · 9× Democrats NORP · 5× Florida GPE · 3× Latino NORP · 3× Arizona GPE · 2× Democrat NORP · 2× New York GPE · 2× Colorado GPE · 1× Republican Party ORG · 1× Vox ORG · 1×

Narrative

Their main priority — and this is true in a lot of excess polling, even polling by Atlas Intel — said immigration was number one, but they split the economic argument into different categories, so that’s why economics was not number one, but it would’ve been number one if it’d all been in one category.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-09
Challenge yourself and hope to meet the moment because that will lead to a better Republican Party, a conservative movement willing to address the issues.
2026-11-09 · The Daily Wire
The Shocking Math Behind The Midterm Disaster · assertive framing

Claims (146 extracted, 8 hedged)

This is a republished monologue with permission from the creator. asserted
This → republish → creator
You can hear the original and the complete show, “REPUBLICAN MELTDOWN! The Brutal Truth Behind Trump’s Midterm Disaster,” here. asserted
You → hear → Disaster
This isn’t the moment to look for comfortable answers to an election blowout. asserted
This → look → blowout
This is the time to say, “All right, what is really going on? What’s really turning people off?” asserted
What → say → people
Challenge yourself and hope to meet the moment because that will lead to a better Republican Party, a conservative movement willing to address the issues. asserted
that → challenge → issues
And that’s what I really wanted to do. asserted
I → ’ → what
Make sure I don’t go to my defaults in this moment. asserted
I → make → moment
Look at liberal Vox; they asked me, to the effect of, “How do you know if your priors are wrong? asserted
priors → look → effect
I said, “Listen, everyone does this. asserted
everyone → say → this
Everyone says they don’t like to be challenged on their ideology. asserted
they → say → ideology
Look at the amendments over not allowing biological men in female spaces and female sports, which passed unanimously across the country in blue states like Colorado and Washington, and passed overwhelmingly. asserted
which → look → Colorado
Could you find 100 members of this current Democratic Congress, 50% or 52% who would sign onto a bill saying that? uncertain
who → find → that
Could you find 50 members who would say there are actually only two biological sexes? uncertain
who → find → members
The electoral class is almost always more extreme than the general public; remember that. asserted
class → remember → that
They fear the political class and its judgment. asserted
They → fear → class
They will ignore very obvious things most Americans believe. asserted
Americans → ignore → things
So the only way we’re going to be able to do that, to challenge ourselves to find better answers, is to examine the data. asserted
we → go → data
First, the generic ballot looks like it’s a D +13 electorate. asserted
it → look → ?
That means that the Democrats won the overall popular vote in the House of Representatives by a 13-point margin, which is near historic. asserted
which → mean → margin
It’s Watergate levels — very high. asserted
It → ’ → ?
We don’t know the exact number yet because, of course, California will be counting votes until the next election. asserted
California → know → election
They’ll finally finalize the vote, and then we’ll go to another election. asserted
we → finalize → election
So it’s about a 15-point swing — 15 points overall. asserted
it → ’ → ?
That’s what the New York Times is estimating, and they were very right in their polling. asserted
they → ’ → polling
Looking at the polling, the two groups that swung hardest against Republicans were young people, who moved 33 points toward Democrats, followed by Latinos, who moved 29 points toward Democrats. asserted
who → look → Democrats
There are a lot of young people who are Latinos. asserted
who → be → people
So when one moves, the other one moves with it because they’re kind of the same group in a lot of cases. asserted
they → move → cases
Two things about that: Latinos who are younger swung more to the left than Latinos who are older. asserted
who → swing → Latinos
Likewise, Latinos who make $50,000 a year or less asserted
who → make → 50,000
also swung further to the left than Latinos who made higher amounts of income — $100,000 or $200,000. asserted
who → swing → income
That’s both a persuasion part of that element of why they swung. asserted
they → ’ → element
It’s also a turnout part of that. asserted
It → ’ → that
Democrats persuaded more Latinos on policy, but they also persuaded more Democrat Latinos to turn out, which affects how aggressive that swing towards Democrat Latinos was. asserted
swing → persuade → Latinos
Florida is a great state to examine because it has a lot of data, a large Latino population, and, unlike Texas, it registers people by party. asserted
it → examine → party
This is going to be, by the way, the thing that I do for the rest of my life: encourage states to register people by party because it makes examining data much easier. asserted
examining → go → data
And unlike other states that do register by party, like Arizona and New York, which also have large Latino populations, Florida actually counts all their votes on election night. asserted
Florida → register → night
Can you imagine a world where, in New York, which is still counting votes, and Arizona, which is still counting votes, we could all count our votes on election night? uncertain
we → imagine → night
In the early vote — Florida is a state where a majority of people, over 80% of the population, vote early — Latino Democrats outvoted Latino Republicans in every age category except Latino senior citizens. asserted
Democrats → vote → citizens
Among 18- to 34-year-olds, Latino Democrats outvoted Latino Republicans by a margin of three to one. asserted
Democrats → outvote → one
It was so small, in fact, among the youngest population that Latino independents outvoted them, and independents always vote less often than Republicans or Democrats. asserted
independents → outvote → Republicans
…and 106 more, not listed.
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support