Photo via The Daily Wire

Democrats Have A Plan To Use Midterm Blowout To Undo Electoral College

Read the original at The Daily Wire ↗
Cite

Valdes, A. (2026, November 6). Democrats Have A Plan To Use Midterm Blowout To Undo Electoral College. The Daily Wire. https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrats-have-a-plan-to-use-midterm-blowout-to-undo-electoral-college

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Daily Wire · collected 2026-11-08 · by Andie Valdes

Quick Summary

Democrats are exploring ways to change presidential elections after their midterm victories, focusing on abolishing the Electoral College in favor of a national popular vote system through the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. This compact requires states to award electoral votes to the national popular vote winner and has been approved by 18 states plus D.C., totaling 222 electoral votes. The goal now is to gain support from recently flipped swing states such as Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada to reach the necessary 270 electoral votes for activation. However, legal experts caution that this approach faces significant challenges since interstate compacts typically require congressional approval.
Written by AI on 2026-11-09, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 6, 2026, following a "blue wave" in the midterms, Democrats are pushing to change how U.S. presidents are elected by advancing the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC). This compact requires states to award their electoral votes to the national popular vote winner rather than the state's vote tally. Currently, 18 states and D.C., totaling 222 electoral votes, have joined the NPVIC. The goal is to reach 270 electoral votes for it to take effect. Democrats are focusing on five newly controlled states—Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada—to join the compact and push it closer to implementation.

Written for “Democrats Plan to Undo Electoral College” on 2026-11-09, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

Democrats Plan to Undo Electoral College
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
Leans left Hedges 4 of 30 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the voting process during the midterm election, while Article B discusses potential political strategies following the election results.”
The Guardian
Leans left Hedges 7 of 57 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles cover different stages and implications of the midterm election rather than a single specific event.”
Evening Standard
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 28 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the midterm elections' aftermath: Article A reports on the immediate election results and their impact on Trump's status, while Article B discusses Democrats' plans following the electoral victory.”
Evening Standard
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 25 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles cover different aspects: one reports on the election results and their immediate impact on Trump's presidency, while the other discusses Democrats' plans following the victory.”
The Guardian
Leans left Hedges 6 of 36 claims Outlet record 65/100
“Article A reports on the immediate results and implications of the US midterm elections, while Article B discusses subsequent political strategies and plans by Democrats following the election outcomes.”
Al Jazeera
Leans left Hedges 31 of 97 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the election outcome: Article A focuses on the results themselves, while Article B discusses potential policy changes in response to those results.”
The Guardian
Leans left Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to the midterm elections: Article A reports on the election results themselves and their immediate impact on Trump's presidency, while Article B discusses potential policy changes in response to those results.”
Washington Examiner
Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses Democrats' overall strategy after winning the midterms, while Article B specifically mentions their plan to change the Electoral College, which is a different aspect of their broader strategy.”
Dawn
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 40 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles describe different aspects of Democratic reactions to their midterm victory; Article A focuses on immediate responses and policy intentions, while Article B discusses a long-term plan related to electoral reform.”
The Independent
Hedges 3 of 42 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Democratic victories following the 2026 midterm elections: one focuses on gains in state legislatures, while the other discusses plans to change the Electoral College.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
16
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
2 of 16 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
95/100
The Daily Wire's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-09 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Daily Wire · 52 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Andie Valdes
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
“Championing those most in need has been my life’s calling, and I will never stop fighting to make a difference for the people who mean so much to me,” he said at the time.
Tuesday’s election results may have brought that goal closer.
Also by Andie Valdes
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Democrats Michigan Nevada Times the United States

Subjects

Democrats NORP · 3× Michigan GPE · 2× Nevada GPE · 2× Times ORG · 2× Arizona GPE · 1× Electoral College ORG · 1× Pennsylvania GPE · 1× Wisconsin GPE · 1× the District of Columbia GPE · 1× the United States GPE · 1×

Narrative

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which is already approved by 18 states and the District of Columbia, would require participating states to award their electoral votes to the national popular vote winner, regardless of which candidate wins their state.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-09
Tuesday’s election results may have brought that goal closer.
2026-11-09 · The Daily Wire
Democrats Have A Plan To Use Midterm Blowout To Undo Electoral College · assertive framing

Claims (16 extracted, 2 hedged)

In the aftermath of a sweeping blue wave this midterm season, Democrats have been quick to float several ideas they hope to accomplish with their newfound victory. asserted
they → float → victory
One of them is to fundamentally change the way the United States elects a president. asserted
States → change → president
For decades, many Democrats have sought to have the presidency decided by the national popular vote rather than state-by-state Electoral College results. asserted
presidency → seek → state
Tuesday’s election results may have brought that goal closer. uncertain
results → bring → goal
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which is already approved by 18 states and the District of Columbia, would require participating states to award their electoral votes to the national popular vote winner, regardless of which candidate wins their state. asserted
candidate → approve → state
As of right now, the electoral votes from the states that have already signed amount to 222 votes. asserted
that → sign → votes
But the compact can only take effect once it reaches 270 votes — the same number a candidate needs to win the presidency. asserted
candidate → take → presidency
The focus is now on the five states where Democrats secured control of the governor’s office and both legislative chambers: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada. asserted
Democrats → secure → office
If these states join the compact, they would join the coalition and provide enough electoral votes to activate it. asserted
they → join → it
A previous attempt by Nevada to join the agreement was vetoed by the state’s Democrat governor in 2019. asserted
attempt → join → 2019
Several lawmakers told the New York Times that they had already begun discussing legislation for the next session, and were hopeful they could succeed before 2028. Michigan state Rep. Carrie Rheingans told the Times, “This blue tsunami is really going to help push this forward across the whole nation.” However, even if that happens, experts say the agreement would face serious legal challenges. uncertain
agreement → tell → challenges
Derek Muller, an election law expert at Notre Dame Law School, told the Times that interstate compacts traditionally require approval from Congress and the president. asserted
compacts → tell → Congress
“It’s a very real possibility that enough states join this compact,” he said. asserted
he → ’ → compact
The push for the popular vote gained particular attention starting in 2000 when President George W. Bush was elected to office despite losing the popular vote. asserted
Bush → gain → vote
The same situation has occurred four other times, including with President Donald Trump in 2016, when he won the presidency but lost the popular vote. asserted
he → occur → vote
A YouGov poll from June 2026 showed that 56% of adults think a president should be elected by popular vote, not the Electoral College. asserted
president → show → vote
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support