Photo via The Sydney Morning Herald

Beau Lamarre-Condon denies executing Jesse Baird

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Beau Lamarre-Condon denies executing Jesse Baird. (2026, November 9). The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/national/beau-lamarre-condon-denies-executing-jesse-baird-20261109-p61cpc.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-11-09

Quick Summary

No summary of this article yet; the story summary below covers the event.

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 10, 2026, Beau Lamarre-Condon, a former NSW Police officer, is testifying in his double murder trial at the Supreme Court in Sydney. He faces charges for fatally shooting Jesse Baird and Luke Davies with his police-issued Glock pistol in 2024. During the trial, Lamarre-Condon admitted to entering Baird's home without permission and accessing his private messages but denies breaking in. The accused also described a sexual relationship with Baird that lasted from October to November 2022, stating he would have liked Baird regardless of his occupation. When cross-examined by Crown prosecutor Brett Hatfield SC, the judge reprimanded Lamarre-Condon for giving speeches instead of answering questions succinctly.

Written for “Beau Lamarre-Condon Double Murder Trial Updates” on 2026-11-10, grounded in this article and the 22 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

Beau Lamarre-Condon Double Murder Trial Updates
Crime & Law · 23 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges an unknown share of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 3 of 40 claims Outlet record 67/100
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 28 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles involve Beau Lamarre-Condon denying accusations related to Jesse Baird, they describe different moments in the ongoing legal process.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 61/100
“While both articles discuss Beau Lamarre-Condon's testimony, ARTICLE B describes a more detailed cross-examination in court that includes references to additional evidence and dates not mentioned in ARTICLE A.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 0 of 7 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles involve Beau Lamarre-Condon's testimony in his murder trial, they describe different moments within the trial process.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A describes Lamarre-Condon surrendering to police and speaking with detectives, while Article B seems to focus on his denial of executing Jesse Baird in court proceedings, indicating a different specific event or phase of the case.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 61/100
“Article A covers the start of the defence case in the trial, while Article B appears to focus on Lamarre-Condon's denial regarding one of the victims, suggesting a different moment or aspect of the trial.”
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 1 of 52 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles refer to different dates and the second article does not specify that it covers live testimony, suggesting it may be reporting on a later development or summary of events rather than the same specific court appearance.”
The Guardian
Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles cover different parts of the trial; Article A discusses Lamarre-Condon's testimony about his relationship with Jesse Baird and other matters, while Article B focuses on his denial regarding executing Jesse Baird.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The first article describes Lamarre-Condon giving evidence on his second day of trial, while the second article's title suggests a denial regarding a specific accusation and does not confirm it as occurring on the same day or during the same testimony session.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
0
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
no claims
nothing to measure
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
23
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
none derived
Analyzed 2026-11-09 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 6569 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

No reporter is named on this article.

Topics

No topics tagged.

Subjects

No subjects extracted.

Narrative

No narrative derived. That requires at least one asserted claim.

Claims (0 extracted, 0 hedged)

No claims extracted from this article.
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support