Photo via Dawn

£190m corruption case: IHC adjourns hearing for 10 days, orders meeting between Imran and legal team

Read the original at Dawn ↗
Cite

Asad, M. (2026, November 10). £190m corruption case: IHC adjourns hearing for 10 days, orders meeting between Imran and legal team. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/2043503/ps190m-corruption-case-ihc-adjourns-hearing-for-10-days-orders-meeting-between-imran-and-legal-team

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Dawn · collected 2026-11-10 · by Malik Asad

Quick Summary

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) adjourned for 10 days the hearing of appeals filed by Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi against their convictions in a £190 million corruption case. The court also ordered authorities to facilitate meetings between Imran, who is serving a 14-year prison sentence, and his legal team. During the proceedings, Barrister Salman Safdar highlighted difficulties in accessing both clients for consultations and expressed concerns about Bushra’s medical condition, particularly her eye infection.
Written by AI on 2026-11-12, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On November 10, 2026, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) adjourned the hearing of appeals filed by Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi against their convictions in the £190 million corruption case, also known as the Al-Qadir Trust case, for 10 days. The couple, who are serving prison sentences of 14 and 7 years respectively, were ordered to meet their legal team at Adiala jail. The next day, on November 11, PTI lawyers Salman Safdar and Latif Khosa visited Adiala jail to meet Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi as per the IHC's orders. The meeting lasted at least three hours, focusing on legal and health issues, although no further details were released to the media. PTI Secretary General Salman Akram Raja reported that Imran instructed the party to "stick firmly to the ideology" of the PTI.

Written for “Imran's Jail Meeting With Lawyers” on 2026-11-13, grounded in this article and the 5 other(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Hindu
Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 78/100
“The articles describe different occurrences related to Imran Khan's legal and medical situation but do not refer to the same specific incident.”
Dawn
Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 72/100
Dawn
Hedges 1 of 25 claims Outlet record 72/100
Dawn
Hedges 1 of 28 claims Outlet record 72/100
Dawn
Hedges 2 of 22 claims Outlet record 72/100
“While both articles discuss Imran Khan's legal situation and a court order facilitating meetings between him and his legal team, they describe different specific events occurring at different times.”
Dawn
Hedges 0 of 15 claims Outlet record 72/100
“Article A describes the IHC adjourning the hearing for 10 days and ordering a meeting between Imran Khan and his legal team, while Article B covers PTI lawyers reaching Adiala jail to meet Imran Khan following the IHC's order. Although related, they describe different stages of the same case.”

Story

Imran's Jail Meeting With Lawyers
Politics · 6 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↑
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
42
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
5 of 42 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
72/100
Dawn's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
6
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-12 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Dawn · 3080 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Malik Asad
50 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
He recalled that on June 29, the court had specifically directed the counsel to proceed with arguments and obtained an undertaking that no adjournment would be sought.
Ahsan, who is the primary suspect in the case, will remain in police custody for two days.
Jatt had filed a petition, seeking the court’s intervention to prevent his arrest before he could reach the court of competent jurisdiction.
“I will call for all reports and summon all evidence,” Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro observed while hearing a petition filed by lawyer Riaz Hanif Rahi on behalf of The Jurists Foundation of Pakistan.
When defence counsel Riasat Ali Azad informed the court that the record had been received that day, the judge remarked that he would have shown the police the consequences of failing to produce it on Tuesday.
The judgement clarified that although police could maintain internal records of criminal cases for official purposes, such information could not be disclosed in character certificates issued to citizens, particularly when these were required for travelling abroad.
Following the completion of the trial and final arguments, the court reserved its verdict and said that it would be pronounced on Oct 29.
“But we surrender ourselves before the ultimate court where we all must return one day, where all will be held accountable for what they have done.”
He will preside over a single bench at the Rawalpindi registry.
While offering yet another opportunity to human rights lawyer Imaan Zainab Hazir-Mazari and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to record their statements in a security breach case, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Saturday warned them that a verdict could come even without their testimony if they refused.
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · ATC warns Imaan, husband of verdict sans testimony
Also by Malik Asad
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 50 articles by Malik Asad →

Topics

IHC ISLAMABAD PTI The Islamabad High Court

Subjects

Bushra PERSON · 9× Imran PERSON · 8× Dogar PERSON · 5× Khosa PERSON · 4× PTI ORG · 4× Safdar PERSON · 4× IHC ORG · 3× ISLAMABAD GPE · 2× Imran Khan PERSON · 1× The Islamabad High Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

The £190m pound case pertains to the Al-Qadir Trust settlement, where NAB alleged that Imran and Bushra obtained billions of rupees and land worth hundreds of kanals from a real estate firm for legalising Rs50 billion that was identified and returned to the country by the United Kingdom during the PTI government.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-12
He recalled that on June 29, the court had specifically directed the counsel to proceed with arguments and obtained an undertaking that no adjournment would be sought.

Claims (42 extracted, 5 hedged)

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday adjourned for 10 days the hearing of appeals filed by PTI founder and former prime minister Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, against their convictions in the £190 million reference. asserted
Court → adjourn → reference
The couple is serving prison sentences in the £190m corruption case, also known as the Al-Qadir Trust case. asserted
couple → serve → case
An accountability court had sentenced Imran to 14 years in prison and Bushra to seven years. asserted
court → sentence → years
The IHC also directed the authorities to facilitate meetings between Imran and his legal team. asserted
IHC → direct → Imran
At the outset of the proceedings on Tuesday, Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, heading a division bench, observed that he had allowed the lawyers to meet Imran and Bushra. asserted
lawyers → head → Imran
He recalled that on June 29, the court had specifically directed the counsel to proceed with arguments and obtained an undertaking that no adjournment would be sought. asserted
adjournment → recall → undertaking
Barrister Salman Safdar responded that the undertaking had been given by Advocate Sardar Latif Khan Khosa, who should explain his position before the court. asserted
who → respond → court
He said he was present to argue the appeals as well as a civil miscellaneous application seeking permission for Bushra to receive medical treatment. asserted
Bushra → say → treatment
Justice Dogar, however, observed that the undertaking had been furnished by Khosa and that arguments on the main appeals would commence forthwith and conclude in due course. asserted
arguments → observe → course
Khosa, however, informed the court that he had not been granted access to Imran. asserted
he → inform → Imran
Taking note of the matter, the chief justice asked Islamabad Advocate General Naveed Hayat Malik whether arrangements could be made for Khosa to meet the PTI founder within the next couple of days. uncertain
Khosa → take → days
The advocate general responded in the affirmative. asserted
general → respond → affirmative
Justice Dogar reiterated that he wanted formal arguments in the appeals to begin. asserted
arguments → reiterate → appeals
Meanwhile, lawyer and PTI Secretary General Salman Akram Raja informed the court that he had received instructions from Imran. asserted
he → inform → Imran
Justice Dogar observed that the court’s directions also formed part of the judicial record. asserted
directions → observe → record
Barrister Safdar told the bench that he had been denied access to Imran for the past seven months and to Bushra for the past 11 months. asserted
he → tell → months
Justice Dogar recalled that Barrister Safdar had earlier expressed his inability to argue the case due to restrictions on meetings with his clients. asserted
Safdar → recall → clients
The counsel further pointed out that the paper books in the appeals had yet to be received from the IHC. asserted
books → point → IHC
He said the case involved approximately 3,500 pages of documents and testimony from 35 witnesses, which required thorough examination before he could properly present his arguments. uncertain
he → say → arguments
Seeking reasonable time for preparation, Barrister Safdar said he had been allowed to meet Imran and Bushra for only 40 minutes, which was insufficient to discuss the cases in detail. asserted
which → seek → detail
He also apprised the court of Bushra’s medical condition, saying that she appeared deeply concerned when he met her after a gap of 11 months and that her eyes appeared to be badly infected. asserted
eyes → apprise → months
Regarding Imran’s health, he said that although his eyesight had improved somewhat, his blood pressure remained unstable, putting him at risk of a brain haemorrhage. asserted
pressure → regard → haemorrhage
He added that the PTI founder was more concerned about his wife’s health than his own. asserted
founder → add → own
Barrister Safdar said Bushra had been wearing sunglasses during their meeting and had removed them only at his insistence. asserted
Bushra → say → insistence
He maintained that her eye condition appeared serious and required immediate attention from a specialist. asserted
condition → maintain → specialist
He argued that women could be granted bail on statutory grounds and that Bushra urgently needed medical treatment. uncertain
Bushra → argue → treatment
He requested the court to consider granting her bail for a fortnight to enable her to receive appropriate medical care. asserted
He → request → care
Advocate General Malik, however, maintained that Bushra had been provided with proper medical treatment. asserted
Bushra → maintain → treatment
He argued that individuals convicted and sentenced by courts could not claim the same absolute rights as law-abiding citizens. uncertain
individuals → argue → citizens
Justice Dogar observed that Khosa would argue the main appeals and directed the advocate general to facilitate his meeting with Imran. asserted
Khosa → observe → Imran
Barrister Safdar also requested an opportunity to meet both Imran and Bushra, explaining that his last meeting with them had taken place after a prolonged gap. asserted
meeting → request → gap
Raja supported the request and asked the court to allow Barrister Safdar to accompany Khosa during the proposed meeting with Imran. asserted
Safdar → support → Imran
Justice Dogar, however, observed that the matter relating to Bushra’s medical treatment was pending before the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) and that Barrister Safdar could pursue the issue of access to his clients before the appropriate forum. uncertain
Safdar → observe → forum
Barrister Safdar reiterated his request that Bushra be permitted to receive medical treatment from a specialist of her own choice. asserted
Bushra → reiterate → choice
At the conclusion of the proceedings, the court directed the advocate general to arrange a meeting of at least an hour between Khosa and the PTI founder. asserted
court → direct → Khosa
It also directed the authorities to ensure that the paper books were prepared and made available before the next hearing. asserted
books → direct → hearing
Barrister Safdar informed the bench that he had also been instructed to argue both appeals. asserted
he → inform → appeals
The court further allowed Barrister Safdar to meet Imran and Bushra before adjourning the proceedings for 10 days. asserted
Safdar → allow → days
The £190m pound case pertains to the Al-Qadir Trust settlement, where NAB alleged that Imran and Bushra obtained billions of rupees and land worth hundreds of kanals from a real estate firm for legalising Rs50 billion that was identified and returned to the country by the United Kingdom during the PTI government. asserted
that → pertain → government
The amount was deposited in the Supreme Court account as part of a settlement with the property tycoon. asserted
amount → deposit → tycoon
…and 2 more, not listed.
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support