Photo via Washington Examiner

Colorado Democrats plot to overturn the will of their voters

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Faria, Z. (2026, November 10). Colorado Democrats plot to overturn the will of their voters. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beltway-confidential/4798794/colorado-democrats-plot-overturn-the-will-of-voters/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-11-10 · by Zachary Faria

Quick Summary

Colorado Democrats are considering ways to overturn recent ballot propositions that align with their party’s platform despite voter approval. Specifically, voters passed Propositions 134 and 135, which restrict transgender athletes from girls' sports and prohibit sex-change surgeries for minors. Additionally, Propositions 132 and 133 were approved to enhance penalties for fentanyl possession and trafficking and mandate life sentences for child sex traffickers.
Written by AI on 2026-11-10, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Governor-elect Phil Weiser, a Democrat, is signaling that Colorado’s Democratic-controlled legislature might revisit voter-approved ballot propositions that restrict transgender participation in girls' sports and prohibit gender-affirming care for minors. This move has drawn accusations of hypocrisy from Republicans who point to the Democrats’ support for the "No Kings" movement, which opposes unilateral changes by elected officials. Last week, Colorado voters passed Propositions 134 and 135, which ban male athletes from girls' sports and prohibit sex-change surgeries for transgender minors, despite a Democratic sweep in other areas. Weiser suggested at his first post-election news conference that the legislature could make adjustments to these measures, arguing it is "statutory" and an appropriate role for lawmakers. Republicans have criticized this stance as contradictory to democratic principles.

Written for “Democrats Accused Of Hypocrisy Over Trans Sports Measures” on 2026-11-11, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans right for article 142688 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-10

Story

Democrats Accused Of Hypocrisy Over Trans Sports Measures
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 21 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses Weiser's statement about potentially changing a ballot measure after the election, while Article B refers to Colorado Democrats planning to overturn voter-passed propositions in a broader context.”
Fox News
Hedges 2 of 35 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A refers to Washington State's Democratic Party response to Initiative I-638, while Article B discusses Colorado Democrats' reaction to Propositions in their state.”
The Guardian
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 20 of 100 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles describe different events: one focuses on a lawsuit against HB2 in North Carolina regarding transgender rights, while the other discusses Colorado voters passing propositions related to transgender athletes and minors.”
Just The News
Leans right Hedges 0 of 8 claims Outlet record 95/100
“While both articles discuss ballot measures concerning transgender rights in Colorado, Article A describes the results of the election while Article B focuses on Democratic plans to overturn the will of voters after the propositions were passed.”
New York Post
Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 4 of 38 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on the initial passage of ballot measures in multiple states, while Article B discusses Colorado Democrats' reaction to the results, focusing specifically on their planned response rather than the actual voting event.”
The Free Press
Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 97/100
“Article A discusses the overall outcome of the 2026 midterms for Democrats, while Article B focuses specifically on Colorado's attempts to overturn certain propositions regarding transgender issues.”
Blaze Media
Leans right Hedges 3 of 21 claims Outlet record 95/100
“Article A describes the passage of propositions banning gender-related procedures for minors and protecting girls' sports, while Article B discusses Colorado Democrats planning to overturn those propositions.”
The Daily Wire
Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 7 of 28 claims Outlet record 95/100
“While both articles discuss Colorado voters passing Propositions 134 and 135, Article A focuses on the Democrats' reaction to overturning voter decisions, whereas Article B reports on the results of the propositions being passed.”
Washington Examiner
Leans right Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses multiple states passing restrictive transgender ballot measures, while Article B focuses on Colorado Democrats' reaction to the passage of similar propositions in their state.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
5
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 5 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4595 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Zachary Faria
34 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
The Democratic Party will ramble on about the sanctity of democracy in one breath and insist in the next that it must overturn any result it dislikes.
Taking a break from calling President Donald Trump an authoritarian, California Gov. Gavin Newsom has decided to unilaterally eliminate the death penalty in California, rewriting sentences in hundreds of cases against the will of California voters.
Los Angeles voters chose to dump Mayor Karen Bass, herself a sympathizer of Cuba’s communist regime, in favor of Democratic Socialists of America member Nithya Raman.
The Democratic Party’s sweep into power in the 2026 midterm elections means Democrats will spend the next two years planning the extreme power grabs they have been agitating for, to be carried out if they retake the White House in 2028.
Cornyn was not a perfect senator, but the decision to uproot him came primarily from his unwillingness to tell Republican voters exactly what they wanted to hear when reality did not reflect it.
Newsom, who will leave office in January as the state’s term-limited governor (and will almost certainly run for president in 2028), announced he was “proposing the expansion of California’s current Film and Television Tax Credit Program from $750 million to at least $1 billion, and expanding the program as the nation’s largest capped film and TV tax credit.”
You may think that Chicago is a haven of violent crime.
If only the Democratic politicians who have continued to pour money into the project would do the same.
How will Xavier Becerra differ from Gavin Newsom as governor of California?
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Becerra will be Newsom, but worse for California
Next week’s midterm elections will give voters in a couple of Democrat-run states the opportunity to roll back transgender ideology and protect children from the injustice and medical malpractice Democrats are allowing to be inflicted upon them.
Also by Zachary Faria
Republican winners from the 2026 midterm elections
2026-11-08 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 34 articles by Zachary Faria →

Topics

Colorado Democratic Party’s Democrats The Democratic Party

Subjects

Colorado GPE · 2× Democratic Party’s ORG · 1× Democrats NORP · 1× The Democratic Party ORG · 1×

Narrative

The other two, Propositions 132 and 133, address crime by increasing penalties for possessing or selling fentanyl and making child sex trafficking punishable by life in prison.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-10
The Democratic Party will ramble on about the sanctity of democracy in one breath and insist in the next that it must overturn any result it dislikes.
2026-11-10 · Washington Examiner
Colorado Democrats plot to overturn the will of their voters · assertive framing

Claims (5 extracted, 0 hedged)

The Democratic Party will ramble on about the sanctity of democracy in one breath and insist in the next that it must overturn any result it dislikes. asserted
it → ramble → result
Such is the case in Colorado, where Democrats are already planning to shred ballot propositions voters just passed. asserted
voters → plan → propositions
Last week, Colorado voters passed several propositions that run counter to the state Democratic Party’s platform. asserted
that → pass → platform
Two of them, Propositions 134 and 135, address transgenderism by barring male athletes from girls’ sports and banning sex-change surgeries for transgender minors. asserted
Two → address → minors
The other two, Propositions 132 and 133, address crime by increasing penalties for possessing or selling fentanyl and making child sex trafficking punishable by life in prison. asserted
trafficking → address → prison
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support