Photo via The Independent

Hegseth shredded for ‘just following orders’ press conference to defend his actions

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Dobkin, R. (2026, November 10). Hegseth shredded for ‘just following orders’ press conference to defend his actions. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/pete-hegseth-impeachment-press-conference-reactions-b3082707.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-11-10 · by Rachel Dobkin

Quick Summary

Pete Hegseth, Defense Secretary, faced severe online criticism after holding a press conference where he claimed his actions in Iran, Yemen, and Venezuela were lawful orders from President Trump. Congressman Thomas Massie introduced impeachment articles against Hegseth for allegedly unlawful wartime operations. Critics compared Hegseth’s defense to the “just following orders” excuse used by Nazi officials at the Nuremberg trials, highlighting its unethical implications.
Written by AI on 2026-11-10, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 10, 2026, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has become a primary target for political fallout following Republican losses in the midterm elections, with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) reintroducing articles of impeachment against him. President Donald Trump initially defended Hegseth, saying he was "doing a great job," but Democrats in the House are moving forward with plans to investigate and potentially impeach him for his role in the Iran war. Massie introduced eight articles accusing Hegseth of violating Congress' constitutional authority to declare war and other high crimes and misdemeanors. The articles aim to hold Hegseth accountable for the disastrous war, which contributed significantly to Republican losses. However, Massie now signals flexibility on voting procedures, potentially allowing separate votes on each article.

Written for “Hegseth Impeachment Effort” on 2026-11-11, grounded in this article and the 191 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

Hegseth Impeachment Effort
Politics · 192 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
Hedges 3 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Guardian
Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 39 claims Outlet record 65/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
The Independent
Leans strongly right Hedges 0 of 15 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Bulwark
Leans strongly left Hedges 8 of 121 claims
Dawn
Hedges 0 of 18 claims Outlet record 72/100
Toronto Sun
Hedges 3 of 21 claims Outlet record 95/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 2 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 1 of 29 claims Outlet record 64/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
25
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
2 of 25 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
192
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 4111 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Rachel Dobkin
131 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Pete Hegseth has been spared from impeachment — for now — after House Republicans blocked a procedural hurdle that would have led to a vote on the accusations against the Pentagon chief.
If Hegseth committed high crimes or misdemeanors, and if he did them at the behest of, or on behalf of, or in cahoots with, someone else, say, I don’t know … uh … let’s assume the president of the United States … that would mean .…
Johnson called the Democrats gaining control of Congress a “great tragedy,” adding that if Republicans kept the majority, “we would stay on course to continue delivering for the people and I just don’t know how that’s going to work going forward.” But the people see a grim economy made worse by the rising gas prices brought on by the Iran war that Trump started. Seventy-five percent of House voters said the economy was poor or not so good in ABC News Voter Polls.
The White House has said it’s “wrong” to assume Trump may allow amnesty deals for illegal immigrants. “The word ‘amnesty’ was never even said in this entire exchange,” the administration’s rapid response X account wrote.
The father allegedly admitted to investigators that he had returned home, leaving his daughter, so he could keep his place in line and avoid missing out on buying the new cards.
“Two years ago, you won a big, some might say historic victory.
“My husband, Charlie Kirk, was killed in an act of political violence, something our two children and I will live with every day for the rest of our lives,” Erika Kirk’s post continued.
Local authorities believe the man may have gone overboard roughly nine hours before he was found.
Riding the blue tsunami that will give Democrats control of the House and Senate come January, Sanders spoke to NBC News’ Kristen Welker on Sunday’s Meet the Press about pushing his progressive platform of a $ 20-per-hour minimum wage and free healthcare for all.
“We have canceled advertising on I’ve Had It and are reviewing our podcast placements against our brand safety standards,” Zenni wrote on X. Organic bedding brand Boll & Branch said it “does not currently advertise with the ‘I’ve Had It’ podcast and will not in the future.”
Also by Rachel Dobkin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 131 articles by Rachel Dobkin →

Topics

Defense Iran Nuremberg Republican Yemen

Subjects

Hegseth PERSON · 12× Trump PERSON · 6× Iran GPE · 4× Nuremberg GPE · 3× House ORG · 2× Massie PERSON · 2× Pete Hegseth PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Yemen GPE · 2× Defense ORG · 1×

Narrative

Independent journalist Aaron Rupar summed up Hegseth’s comments as “he was just following orders, you see” in a post on X — prompting a flurry of ridicule. “Worked great at Nuremberg,” Rick Wilson, co-founder of the anti-Trump Lincoln Project, sarcastically replied.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-10
If Hegseth committed high crimes or misdemeanors, and if he did them at the behest of, or on behalf of, or in cahoots with, someone else, say, I don’t know … uh … let’s assume the president of the United States … that would mean .…

Claims (25 extracted, 2 hedged)

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is getting shredded online for a rare press conference in which he implied he was just following President Donald Trump’s orders to defend his wartime actions. asserted
he → shred → actions
Hegseth held the press conference — his first one in six months — after Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, who has emerged as a fierce Trump critic, introduced articles of impeachment against the Pentagon chief. asserted
who → hold → chief
The articles filed Monday accuse Hegseth of unlawfully waging war in Iran and Yemen, capturing former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and striking suspected drug trafficking boats. asserted
articles → file → boats
“Iran, the cartels, Maduro, Yemen — every one was a lawful operation ordered by the commander-in-chief, then ordered by myself, notified to Congress, and executed by American warriors who did their jobs,” Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon Tuesday morning. asserted
Hegseth → order → Pentagon
Independent journalist Aaron Rupar summed up Hegseth’s comments as “he was just following orders, you see” in a post on X — prompting a flurry of ridicule. “Worked great at Nuremberg,” Rick Wilson, co-founder of the anti-Trump Lincoln Project, sarcastically replied. asserted
Wilson → sum → Project
Wilson was referring to the series of trials where Nazi leaders were convicted of crimes they committed under German dictator Adolf Hitler. asserted
they → refer → Hitler
Another X user shared an AI-generated photo of Trump, Hegseth and other top administration officials sitting at the Nuremberg trials with the caption, “I was just following orders.” asserted
I → share → orders
Shortly after Hegseth’s comments, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said while talking to reporters in Paris about the Iran war, “Ultimately our job is to execute on the president’s orders.” asserted
job → say → orders
“Lmao Hegseth just used the ‘just following orders’ defense and now Rubio is doing it….they asserted
Rubio → use → it….they
should brush up on the Nuremberg trials and find out how well that defense strategy worked out for the Nazis,” a political account called Wu Tang is for the Children wrote. asserted
Tang → brush → Children
George Conway, a frequent Trump critic, suggested that, by Hegseth’s reasoning, Trump should be impeached too. “ uncertain
Trump → suggest → reasoning
Okay, let’s reason this out. asserted
’s → let → this
If Hegseth committed high crimes or misdemeanors, and if he did them at the behest of, or on behalf of, or in cahoots with, someone else, say, I don’t know … uh … let’s assume the president of the United States … that would mean .… asserted
that → commit → States
I know there’s a logical conclusion here that should be obvious, but it’s just escaping me. asserted
it → know → me
Could it mean that someone else has committed impeachable, removable acts too??” uncertain
someone → mean → acts
Democratic strategist Mike Nellis posted, “‘I was just following orders’ isn't the defense Pete Hegseth thinks it is here.” asserted
it → post → orders
“When I was a young Cadet at West Point, I was taught that an Officer always gives orders in his own name vs blaming them on the higher hq,” wrote Army veteran Ben Hodges. asserted
Hodges → teach → hq
The House will take the first procedural vote on Hegseth’s impeachment articles later Tuesday. asserted
House → take → articles
Massie has signaled that there is at least support for some of the articles. asserted
Massie → signal → articles
“I’ve heard from several members they agree with some of the Articles of Impeachment but not all of them,” the Republican wrote on X Tuesday. asserted
Republican → hear → X
“If the motion to kill my resolution by referring it to committee fails, and we proceed to the Articles themselves, I’ll request a vote on each of the Articles separately.” asserted
I → kill → Articles
Trump — who was impeached twice during his first term and then acquitted by the Senate — said he would stand by Hegseth if the House impeaches him. asserted
House → impeach → him
The president made the comments during an impromptu press conference with his friend, UFC chief Dana White, where he defended Hegseth and called Massie a “stone-cold loser.” asserted
he → make → Massie
“He's certainly winning the war,” Trump said of Hegseth. asserted
Trump → win → Hegseth
“Iran would love to make a deal, and they've been obliterated.” asserted
they → love → deal
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support