Photo via Reason

Bloomington, Indiana, Bans Superintelligent AI, Hoping 350 Other Cities Will Follow

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Pauzé, J. (2026, November 10). Bloomington, Indiana, Bans Superintelligent AI, Hoping 350 Other Cities Will Follow. Reason. https://reason.com/2026/11/10/bloomington-indiana-bans-superintelligent-ai-hoping-350-other-cities-will-follow/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Reason · collected 2026-11-10 · by Josh Pauzé

Quick Summary

Bloomington, Indiana's City Council unanimously passed an ordinance banning "artificial super intelligence" (ASI), defined as systems capable of surpassing human cognitive performance without continuous oversight. The ban, supported by the Safe AI Forever Institute, aims to prevent potential catastrophic outcomes cited by AI experts who claim a high risk of human extinction due to ASI development. Bloomington's ordinance will remain in effect until the state of Indiana enacts a comprehensive safety framework or unless the city council determines there is a broad scientific consensus on safe and controllable superintelligence development, setting an impractically high bar for lifting the ban.
Written by AI on 2026-11-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Bloomington, Indiana, has banned artificial superintelligence (ASI) with a unanimous vote by its City Council on November 9, 2026. The ordinance, backed by the Safe AI Forever Institute, defines ASI as a system capable of outperforming humans in all cognitive tasks without continuous human oversight. While students at nearby Indiana University can still use services like ChatGPT, any model deemed "superintelligent" is prohibited from being activated within Bloomington's borders. Councilmember Dave Rollo introduced the measure citing risks outlined by AI experts who warned of catastrophic outcomes and potential human extinction if such technology is not regulated. The ban will remain in effect until Indiana enacts a comprehensive framework for provably safe superintelligence, after which it would expire in 91 days, according to Rollo's memo.

Written for “Bloomington Bans Superintelligent AI” on 2026-11-11, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

Bloomington Bans Superintelligent AI
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
7 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1256 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Pauzé
11 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
According to Rollo's memo, the ban will last until the state of Indiana enacts a "comprehensive framework for Provably Safe Superintelligence," after which it would expire after 91 days.
Still, the administration deemed he was "subject to removal" because his "presence or activities…would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States."
Lawmakers might finally be catching on to this problem.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · New York Takes Steps Toward a Freer Cannabis Market
Those comments, along with an alleged shove, could land him in jail for up to five years.
We will not stop fighting until this family gets the truth," he added.
The court "seemed to take the view that any dollar spent on other educational programs like scholarships is a dollar that could be spent on public schools instead, but that's not how budgeting works," he says.
"Improperly used J-1 visa classifications to avoid employment obligations, exploit taxpayer-funded programs, and undermine American workers will not be tolerated."
2026-10-13 · assertive framing · No, Giving Immigrants Research Jobs Is Not Fraud​
Starting next year, school choice will be a more attainable option for many American families.
As Americans face rising healthcare costs, Montana is offering a novel right-to-try program that lawmakers hope will bring relief to consumers in the state.
The law, which will go into effect on October 1, 2027, was signed by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom last month.
Also by Josh Pauzé
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 11 articles by Josh Pauzé →

Topics

Bloomington Indiana Indiana University the Bloomington City Council the Safe AI Forever Institute

Subjects

Rollo PERSON · 4× Bloomington GPE · 3× Indiana ORG · 2× Reason ORG · 2× Thierer PERSON · 2× the Safe AI Forever Institute ORG · 2× Dave Rollo PERSON · 1× Indiana University ORG · 1× the Bloomington City Council ORG · 1× the Common Council ORG · 1×

Narrative

The ordinance, which was backed by the Safe AI Forever Institute, defines ASI as a "system or entity capable of significantly outperforming humans on essentially all cognitive tasks" that can operate without "continuous human oversight."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-11
According to Rollo's memo, the ban will last until the state of Indiana enacts a "comprehensive framework for Provably Safe Superintelligence," after which it would expire after 91 days.

Claims (39 extracted, 7 hedged)

Amid the nationwide backlash to AI via data center bans, one Indiana town has moved to prohibit "artificial super intelligence" (ASI). asserted
town → move → intelligence
Last week, the Bloomington City Council voted unanimously to pass an ordinance that "prohibits the distribution and deployment" of ASI. asserted
that → vote → ASI
The ordinance, which was backed by the Safe AI Forever Institute, defines ASI as a "system or entity capable of significantly outperforming humans on essentially all cognitive tasks" that can operate without "continuous human oversight." asserted
that → back → oversight
Covered models are prohibited from being activated by any user interface within the borders of Bloomington, regardless of where the underlying developer is located. asserted
developer → prohibit → Bloomington
Students at nearby Indiana University won't be booted off of ChatGPT just yet, as the city is yet to designate any models "superintelligent." asserted
models → boot → ChatGPT
Councilmember Dave Rollo introduced the measure in a memo to the Common Council, the City Council's legislative body. asserted
Rollo → introduce → Council
He cited concerns from "AI experts" and developers over the technology's potential to cause "catastrophic outcomes" for humanity, including human extinction. asserted
He → cite → extinction
"The level of risk is simply unacceptable," wrote Rollo, referencing "many AI experts" who placed the probability of extinction between 50 percent and more than 99 percent. asserted
who → write → percent
Rollo called the policy an "interim public safety parameter…during a period of state and federal legislative inaction," but the requirements for lifting the ban tell a different story. asserted
requirements → call → story
According to Rollo's memo, the ban will last until the state of Indiana enacts a "comprehensive framework for Provably Safe Superintelligence," after which it would expire after 91 days. uncertain
it → accord → days
Otherwise, it will stay in place until the council determines a "broad scientific consensus that the development of Superintelligence shall be done safely and controllably." asserted
development → stay → Superintelligence
To the council, that would have to be proven by a probabilistic risk assessment that finds 99.9999 percent certainty of safety, the standard used for nuclear power plants. asserted
that → have → plants
"This is an impossible standard to meet," Adam Thierer, a senior fellow at the R Street Institute, tells Reason. asserted
Thierer → meet → Reason
Second of all, there's nothing in this world that's 99.999 percent safe. asserted
that → be → world
"It's likely that this would stay in place pretty much forever once it's put on the books," Thierer says. asserted
Thierer → stay → books
As introduced, the ordinance would have allowed the ban to be lifted if 95 percent of the city's residents voted to strike it down; however, that condition was removed before the council's vote. asserted
condition → introduce → vote
Other cities, counties, and states have implemented their own restrictions on specific AI-related technologies, including automatic license plate readers, AI pricing, and data centers. asserted
cities → implement → readers
What distinguishes AI models from license plate readers or data centers is that they transcend state boundaries instantly, all the time. asserted
they → distinguish → boundaries
Therefore, developers can't easily tailor a large language model to an individual jurisdiction, and local policies can affect models far beyond their borders. asserted
policies → tailor → borders
That appears to be the goal of Bloomington's policy. asserted
That → appear → policy
The ordinance, Rollo writes, "could set a precedent and a template for other cities to follow. uncertain
cities → write → precedent
Over 100 million people live in U.S. cities of Bloomington's size or greater. asserted
people → live → size
If those (approximately 350) cities passed similar ordinances in the coming weeks or months, this would create a massive regulatory burden for companies creating ASI." asserted
this → pass → ASI
The memo also says that the SAFE AI Forever Institute and other nonprofits will continue to lobby for these restrictions in other municipalities. asserted
Institute → say → municipalities
Their strategy, then, is to create a regulatory regime through municipal policies that would effectively govern frontier AI models across the nation. asserted
that → create → nation
Some states have employed a similar playbook, including California and New York. asserted
states → employ → California
A patchwork of different state policies is already confusing, but layering on hundreds of municipal policies would create "a compliance hell," Thierer tells Reason. asserted
Thierer → layer → Reason
"And I think that most of the sponsors not only realize that, but now understand that's the point." asserted
that → think → that
The ordinance could face legal challenges. uncertain
ordinance → face → challenges
The Dormant Commerce Clause restricts state laws that unfairly hinder interstate commerce, even in the absence of federal laws. asserted
that → restrict → laws
If states don't have the power to regulate interstate commerce, then counties surely shouldn't either. asserted
counties → have → commerce
Thierer also warns that the measure could attract First Amendment lawsuits due to its restriction of people's "ability to learn about these technologies or utilize them." uncertain
measure → warn → them
No lawsuit has yet been filed. asserted
lawsuit → file → ?
The ban could be particularly damaging to Indiana University, which is home to the Luddy Artificial Intelligence Center, with hundreds of researchers and students dedicated to studying AI. uncertain
hundreds → dedicate → AI
Beyond that, AI fluency is quickly becoming essential for providing value in any field. asserted
fluency → become → field
That now sits at the mercy of the Bloomington City Council. asserted
That → sit → Council
It seems that these policies won't end in Bloomington. asserted
policies → seem → Bloomington
"It could be that we're seeing the development of a new faction of the AI safety movement within the Safe AI Forever Institute and others included that are basically out to create this expanded vetocracy at the municipal level," Thierer tells Reason. uncertain
Thierer → see → Reason
"Just as a lot of people have been showing up at town hall meetings and county planning meetings and zoning ordinance hearings to protest data centers, you could see the same thing now but for AI models." uncertain
you → show → models
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support