Photo via The Independent

‘They can’t even spell AI’: Republican offers brutal take as Congress flees Hill amid calls for oversight

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Garcia, E. (2026, September 16). ‘They can’t even spell AI’: Republican offers brutal take as Congress flees Hill amid calls for oversight. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/republican-congress-trump-ai-regulation-b3051415.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-09-16 · by Eric Garcia

Quick Summary

Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee criticizes Congress's ability to regulate artificial intelligence, arguing that many lawmakers lack sufficient technological understanding. His comments come as calls for AI oversight increase amid warnings from former researchers about potential risks. Burchett uses examples like college sports regulation to illustrate his point that congressional intervention often leads to negative outcomes. The article highlights the ideological divide in Congress over regulating AI, with some advocating for new laws and others opposing such measures due to concerns about falling behind China technologically.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Rep. Tim Burchett, a conservative Republican from Tennessee, criticized Congress for its lack of understanding regarding artificial intelligence (AI) regulation during a Tuesday press conference. Burchett argued that lawmakers are ill-equipped to create proper safeguards around AI technology due to their limited knowledge and experience in the field. He used a metaphor, saying some politicians return home to find outdated cars and audio systems but claim expertise on cutting-edge tech like AI.

Burchett's comments come amid increasing calls for AI regulation following Jacob Coxon, a former researcher at Anthropic, resigning and warning that people working on AI "earnestly believe it could kill us all by the end of the decade." Despite these concerns, Burchett maintains that Congress should not be involved in further AI oversight, citing examples where previous regulations were ineffective. His remarks reflect broader disagreements within Congress over how to address growing AI risks and regulation needs.

Written for “AI Oversight Debate” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Oversight Debate
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Do It for Charlie Different event
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles describe different events: one discusses expectations for a Republican convention regarding AI regulation, while the other reports on Rep. Tim Burchett's comments about Congress's capability to regulate AI.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and do not describe the same specific incident or time.”
CBS News
Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different perspectives and statements on the issue of AI regulation by Congress, but do not report on the same specific occurrence or moment in time.”
Reason
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and oversight; Article A is about editors debating AI risks and regulations, while Article B reports on Rep. Tim Burchett's comments to The Independent about Congress's ability to regulate AI.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 14 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of Republican efforts and reactions to AI regulation; one focuses on a data center power bill while the other is about a Tennessee congressman's comments.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on AI regulation but describe distinct events and viewpoints from separate representatives.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 31 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 4 of 48 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on AI regulation and opposition but describe distinct events involving Democrats and Republicans.”
NBC News
Hedges 2 of 40 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different speakers and perspectives on AI regulation; Article A focuses on Rep. Tim Burchett's comments, while Article B reports Geoffrey Hinton's warning.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different representatives and their views on AI regulation at distinct times.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
2 of 33 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3448 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eric Garcia
19 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The generic congressional ballot, which measures whether voters will pick a generic Democrat or Republican for Congress, shows Democrats have a nine-point lead.
🔮 He’s clashed with Fox News ever since his first campaign for president when he famously criticized debate moderator Megyn Kelly, saying “you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever.”
🔮 Barrett said she would later have to explain the vest to her 12-year-old son.
🔮 “Our people want to see our Rallies, and reports on our Rallies, on Fox News, or they will very quickly stop watching (like I am doing right now!),” he said.
🔮 President Donald Trump’s economic adviser said that if voters were dissatisfied with the economy, it would show up in the economic data — even as economic data shows Americans are dissatisfied with the state of the economy.
🔮 Rather, he’s argued that he alone can rein them in and argued that if the United States doesn’t go all-in on AI, China will win the AI race.
🔮 The Senate will have its final week of session this week before it breaks.
🔮 All of this might have been well and good for the president, but it yielded few results that the president could offer to Americans with fewer than 40 days until the midterm elections when Republicans are bracing for a bloodbath.
🔮 All of this might have been well and good for the president, but it yielded few results that the president could offer to Americans with fewer than 40 days until the midterm elections when Republicans are bracing for a bloodbath.
🔮 Another reporter asked, “Should U.S. taxpayers pay for ads about you, Mr. President?” in response to a campaign-style ad that the U.S. government released that played on Fox News earlier this week, which promoted how his administration would “defeat communism, socialism and Marxism.”
Also by Eric Garcia
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 19 articles by Eric Garcia →

Topics

Congress Republican Republicans Tennessee The Independent

Subjects

Congress ORG · 6× The Independent ORG · 5× Burchett PERSON · 4× Obernolte PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Republicans NORP · 2× Tennessee GPE · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Washington GPE · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1×

Narrative

“Here's the problem: If I called an emergency session today and I brought everybody in the house and said, ‘Let's regulate AI,’ nobody in the room knows yet what that should look like,” Johnson said at his Tuesday press conference.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 “Some of these guys, they go home, they got a '72 Vega in the driveway with an eight-track tape player, and they want to talk to me about technology, and they can't even spell AI much less know what it is.” Burchett’s frank and homespun comments come as largely Democrats, but also a handful of Republicans, have sounded the alarm after Jacob Coxon, a former researcher at Anthropic resigned and warned that people working on AI “earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”

Claims (33 extracted, 2 hedged)

Amid calls to regulate AI and President Donald Trump saying he is all the guardrail America needs, a conservative Republican from Tennessee is bluntly warning that Congress is not up to the task. asserted
Congress → regulate → task
Rep. Tim Burchett said Congress simply does not know enough to create adequate safeguards around AI when approached by The Independent this week before the House of Representatives was sent home until after the midterm elections. asserted
House → say → elections
“So this bunch trying to regulate anything is a dangerous proposition,” he told The Independent. asserted
he → try → Independent
“Some of these guys, they go home, they got a '72 Vega in the driveway with an eight-track tape player, and they want to talk to me about technology, and they can't even spell AI much less know what it is.” Burchett’s frank and homespun comments come as largely Democrats, but also a handful of Republicans, have sounded the alarm after Jacob Coxon, a former researcher at Anthropic resigned and warned that people working on AI “earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.” uncertain
it → go → decade
But Burchett pointed to the way Congress has regulated everything from AI to college sports — as an argument against his workplace being nvolved in further AI oversight. asserted
workplace → point → oversight
“I mean, look what they did to college sports,” the colorful congressman said. asserted
congressman → mean → sports
“Oh yeah, they killed it. asserted
they → kill → it
Oh, what did they do to healthcare? asserted
they → do → healthcare
They killed it. asserted
They → kill → it
What they do to education, they just about killed it, too. asserted
they → do → it
So this bunch trying to regulate anything is a dangerous proposition.” asserted
bunch → try → anything
Burchett was referring to how Washington and the NCAA have let college sports run amok with name, image and likeness deals for college athletes and unlimited transfer portals that let them jump from one school to another freely. asserted
them → refer → another
The Tennessee Republican said that Washington's poor leadership with college sports shows it cannot be trusted with regulating AI. asserted
it → say → AI
The revelations by Coxon and calls from other corners of the AI industry for strong regulation has largely split Congress, and not necessarily on ideological lines. asserted
revelations → split → lines
Some argue that new laws need to be put in place, while many conservative Republicans say that United States should not rein in AI lest the country lose the technology race to China. asserted
country → argue → China
Burchett’s words came as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) convened a summit on human-centered AI with an unlikely cohort — conservative former Trump adviser Steve Bannon. asserted
Sanders → come → cohort
Sanders told The Independent that he worried about AI’s influence in politics could water down any guardrails for AI, but still seemed optimistic. uncertain
he → tell → AI
“Look, our goal in a very complicated issue is to depend upon the most knowledgeable people in our country, and there are many who want to do the right thing and who want to protect the American people,” he said. asserted
he → look → people
Some members of Congress have proposed new rules on AI. asserted
members → propose → AI
Reps. Lori Trahan (D-Mass.) and Jay Obernolte (D-Calif.) wrote the FRONTIER Act, which would create a tiered system for AI companies and require independent audits. asserted
which → write → audits
“We don't have any regulation at the federal level, and the danger that we run is of having 50 different state regulations that regulate AI in 50 different ways,” Obernolte told The Independent. asserted
Obernolte → have → Independent
Obernolte said he did not necessarily fear AI becoming sentient, but he worried about bad actors using it. asserted
actors → say → it
“I mean, what scares me the most is the malicious use of AI in the hands of human actors,” he said. asserted
he → mean → actors
“Not an army of evil robots rising up to take over the world, but humans using AI to make themselves more productive in stealing people's money or spreading misinformation.” asserted
themselves → rise → misinformation
Trahan for her part dismissed Trump’s comments that “The only control or 'guardrails' that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades.” asserted
U.S.A. → dismiss → spades
“I think it’s completely misguided,” she told The Independent. asserted
she → think → Independent
“We need Congress to get off the sidelines.” asserted
Congress → need → sidelines
House Speaker Mike Johnson has dismissed the need to regulate AI, saying there are already product liability laws under which AI can fall. asserted
AI → dismiss → which
“Here's the problem: If I called an emergency session today and I brought everybody in the house and said, ‘Let's regulate AI,’ nobody in the room knows yet what that should look like,” Johnson said at his Tuesday press conference. asserted
Johnson → call → conference
Because we don't have the latest information. asserted
we → have → information
But Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a populist who represents much of Silicon Valley, said new laws needed to be passed and current laws must be enforced. asserted
laws → represent → Valley
“We need to enforce the criminal laws, people are doing knowingly harm or putting us at risk, they need to be prosecuted or held civilly liable,” Khanna said. asserted
Khanna → need → risk
“This is technical stuff, but we need people who know what they're talking about to really get serious about regulation.” asserted
they → need → regulation
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support