Photo via The Guardian

AI has made it ‘close to impossible’ to assess university coursework, regulator says

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

editor, R. A. E. (2026, November 11). AI has made it ‘close to impossible’ to assess university coursework, regulator says. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2026/nov/11/ai-close-to-impossible-assess-university-coursework-regulator

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-11-11 · by Richard Adams Education editor

Quick Summary

England’s higher education regulator, the Office for Students (OfS), has issued a warning that universities should revert to traditional exams and in-person presentations due to concerns over the widespread use of AI in coursework. An investigation by the OfS found that AI is making it difficult to accurately assess students’ knowledge and skills, with many reporting undetected use of AI tools during assignments. The survey involved interviews with more than 300 students and staff from 127 institutions who expressed significant concerns about academic integrity and the validity of assessments in light of AI advancements.
Written by AI on 2026-11-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 11, 2026, the Office for Students (OfS) has warned that artificial intelligence (AI) is rendering degree assessments in England "unfit for purpose," with students completing coursework "in minutes" using AI and receiving top grades. This trend threatens to undermine the credibility of degrees as universities struggle to assess student knowledge effectively without cheating via AI tools. The OfS report, based on feedback from 244 higher education staff and 91 students across at least 127 universities, indicates that a significant proportion of assessments are unsupervised and vulnerable to AI misuse. To address this issue, the regulator has issued new guidance threatening fines for institutions allowing AI to compromise assessments and is pushing for greater emphasis on traditional exams and supervised, closed-book tests. Lecturers have echoed concerns, stating that some assessments may now be close to impossible to grade fairly without deterring AI use. The Department for Education expects universities to take this issue seriously and comply with OfS standards to ensure valid and reliable assessment methods.

Written for “AI in University Assessments” on 2026-11-11, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.65, but all 5 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 144174: attributed speech only · logged 2026-11-11

Story

AI in University Assessments
Education · 3 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 17% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
18
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
17%
3 of 18 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
65/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Education
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 3245 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Richard Adams Education editor
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
The regulator warned universities and other higher education institutions that failing to design “valid and reliable measures of students’ knowledge and skills” to combat AI could breach their conditions of registration and lead to sanctions being imposed.
We will keep listening to feedback from professionals and parents alike as we continue to improve what we do.”
The study found that nearly half of the students surveyed named procrastination as the thing damaging their ability to do academic work, more than twice the number who named depression, while the same proportion said procrastination caused them significant distress above any other problems including family pressures or bullying. Itamar Shatz, the author of the study and an affiliated lecturer at the University of Cambridge, said that while he expected the survey of US students would show that they experienced harm from procrastination, he was surprised by how strongly it affected them.
The Institute for Government (IfG) thinktank says the government’s plans to largely replace education, health and care plans (EHCPs) in England with more widespread support in mainstream schools may be too optimistic and take longer to complete than its 2030 timeline.
In a letter to Chris Smith, Cambridge’s chancellor, the academics said “it is not yet clear” how the proposed review will answer difficult questions about the university’s involvement in the events leading up to Arday’s death, including its handling of the criticism Arday suffered after his appointment as professor of sociology of education in 2023.
Similar levels nationally would mean just under 10% of all school-age children with an EHCP in 2029.
Also by Richard Adams Education editor
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by Richard Adams Education editor →

Topics

Advance HE Department for Education England OfS The Office for Students

Subjects

OfS ORG · 5× England GPE · 2× Advance HE ORG · 1× Department for Education ORG · 1× Fleming PERSON · 1× Josh Fleming PERSON · 1× The Office for Students ORG · 1×

Narrative

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “We expect universities to take this issue seriously and we expect the OfS to both enforce the existing standards effectively, and work at pace to ensure its regulatory framework is explicit, strong and durable on the use of AI.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-11
The regulator warned universities and other higher education institutions that failing to design “valid and reliable measures of students’ knowledge and skills” to combat AI could breach their conditions of registration and lead to sanctions being imposed.

Claims (18 extracted, 3 hedged)

Universities should go back to traditional exams and in-person presentations to grade students after lecturers complained that AI has made it “close to impossible” to assess coursework, according to an investigation by England’s higher education regulator. uncertain
it → go → regulator
The Office for Students (OfS) said the credibility of degrees from England’s universities was under threat from the prolific use of AI in essays, dissertations and “open book” exams, with students reporting that their peers boasted of using AI undetected by staff. asserted
peers → say → staff
The regulator warned universities and other higher education institutions that failing to design “valid and reliable measures of students’ knowledge and skills” to combat AI could breach their conditions of registration and lead to sanctions being imposed. uncertain
failing → warn → sanctions
Josh Fleming, the director of strategy and delivery at the OfS, said AI use in higher education “presents a generational risk to the system as it stands, threatening to undermine students’ learning and institutions’ ability to assess them”. asserted
it → say → them
Fleming added: “We need to see far greater efforts to tackle these risks, including far greater use of AI-free assessment. asserted
We → add → assessment
“The scale and pace of both the challenge and opportunity presents a novel challenge for the sector and us as the regulator. asserted
scale → present → regulator
We will continue to work with universities and colleges to help them reap the benefits of AI while avoiding the risks.” asserted
them → continue → risks
The OfS said many institutions had already redesigned how they assessed students to reduce potential AI misuse, including greater use of in-person written exams or oral examinations known as vivas. asserted
they → say → vivas
Other examples include students critiquing or editing AI-generated output, or “process-based” assessments where students detail how they researched and produced their work. asserted
they → include → work
A Department for Education spokesperson said: “We expect universities to take this issue seriously and we expect the OfS to both enforce the existing standards effectively, and work at pace to ensure its regulatory framework is explicit, strong and durable on the use of AI.” asserted
framework → say → AI
The report by the OfS and Advance HE, a charity promoting university governance and teaching, interviewed more than 300 students and staff at 127 universities and colleges this year, to gauge AI policies and use in teaching and assessment. asserted
report → promote → teaching
One academic told the researchers: “AI has put academic integrity at serious risk … coursework is now overwhelmingly written in part, or exclusively, with the help of AI.” asserted
coursework → tell → AI
Another university staff member said: “I think we’re realising that a number of our assessments may be unfit for purpose, and that pervasive use of AI may render our assessment of students close to impossible in some areas.” uncertain
assessment → say → areas
The survey found that AI use was rife, with students saying their colleagues completed assessments using AI “sometimes in just a few minutes” and received similar grades to those who had completed an assessment without AI. asserted
who → find → AI
“Some students described their peers being unable to recall basic details about the assessment they had just submitted,” the report noted. asserted
report → describe → assessment
One student told the researchers: “I’ve had people admit, peer to peer, ‘I wrote this whole essay with ChatGPT’ … then they don’t get caught, they get a good grade probably, and then because it worked the first time, they do it on their next assessment.” asserted
they → tell → assessment
Academics also described receiving large numbers of submissions that looked the same, referenced the same literature and were written in the same style. asserted
that → describe → style
Others said they believed the assessments used by their institution were not fit for purpose or did not accurately measure students’ knowledge and skills. asserted
assessments → say → knowledge
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support