Photo via New York Post

The Giants didn’t buy. The Jets didn’t sell. What now after a trade deadline dud?

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Schwartz, J. (2026, November 11). The Giants didn’t buy. The Jets didn’t sell. What now after a trade deadline dud? New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/11/11/sports/giants-didnt-buy-jets-didnt-sell-what-now-after-trade-deadline-dud/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-11-11 · by Jared Schwartz

Quick Summary

The NFL trade deadline passed without significant movement from the New York Giants and Jets, disappointing fans who expected major deals given each team's current standings. The Giants were speculated to acquire Indianapolis Colts running back Jonathan Taylor but ultimately did not make a substantial move despite offering a second- and fifth-round draft pick for him. This decision reflects the Giants' focus on making an impact this year rather than stockpiling future assets, as coach John Harbaugh previously indicated.
Written by AI on 2026-11-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 10, 2026, Jonathan Taylor remains with the Indianapolis Colts, despite trade talks and rumors leading up to the NFL trade deadline. The Colts rejected offers from teams like the New York Giants, who reportedly proposed a second-round and fifth-round pick for Taylor but were turned down by the Colts seeking a blockbuster deal. After their 27-23 loss to the Dallas Cowboys, Taylor expressed uncertainty about his future with Indianapolis, hinting at a farewell to fans despite not requesting a trade. The Colts also traded away receivers Josh Downs and Keenan Allen, adding fourth- and fifth-round picks for Downs and sixth-round picks from the San Francisco 49ers for Allen.

Written for “Jonathan Taylor Trade Rumors Swirl” on 2026-11-11, grounded in this article and the 4 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 144750 · logged 2026-11-11

Story

Jonathan Taylor Trade Rumors Swirl
Sports · 5 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the NFL trade deadline without focusing on the exact same incident or outcome.”
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 43 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles discuss different teams' activities during the NFL trade deadline without specifying the same specific incident or outcome.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
8
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
1 of 8 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
5
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 18808 article(s) · 39 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 39 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jared Schwartz
51 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
With the belief that as that chemistry re-forms, those championship results will return, too.
The Knicks could be getting a needed injury boost.
“I think every game and every week that I’m here, my body will continue to ramp up and ramp up and get better and better.
Wilson’s career has been defined by a constant belief that the future will be better than the present.
David Bailey’s promising rookie season could face a setback.
Assistant coach Chris Jent will be away from the team for an undisclosed period of time for personal reasons, The Post has learned.
But Malik Willis completed a pass to a wide-open Caleb Douglas near the left sideline and Minkah Fitzpatrick — who had a chance to stop Douglas for a short gain — took a bad angle and completely whiffed on the tackle.
tRY IT NOWHero Malik Willis was unbothered most of the afternoon, dissecting the Jets defense for 208 passing yards and two touchdowns, along with another 37 yards and a touchdown on the ground. Zero
Friday night against the Celtics in Boston will be the first time the Knicks face Robinson since he left in free agency.
They believe they will be better off for it.
Also by Jared Schwartz
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 51 articles by Jared Schwartz →

Topics

Colts Giants Jets NFL New York

Subjects

Giants ORG · 4× Big Blue’s ORG · 1× Colts ORG · 1× Jets ORG · 1× John Harbaugh PERSON · 1× Jonathan Taylor PERSON · 1× NFL ORG · 1× New York GPE · 1× Taylor PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The Giants and Jets entered this year’s trading season as two of the league’s most obvious candidates to be a buyer and seller, respectively, given their places in the standings.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-11

Claims (8 extracted, 1 hedged)

After days of anticipation, the NFL trade deadline came and went with a whimper for the New York teams. asserted
deadline → come → teams
The Giants and Jets entered this year’s trading season as two of the league’s most obvious candidates to be a buyer and seller, respectively, given their places in the standings. asserted
Giants → enter → standings
But neither made the type of splash that their fans perhaps hoped for. asserted
fans → make → that
The Giants were heavily linked with Jonathan Taylor, given the Colts’ sell-off and Big Blue’s need for a difference-maker at running back. asserted
Giants → link → back
And the Giants clearly had interest, reportedly offering a second- and fifth-round pick. uncertain
Giants → have → pick
This was not necessarily a case of the Giants being hesitant about this year’s team being capable of making a run. asserted
team → make → run
John Harbaugh said previously that this year holds a bit more weight than the future in terms of how they value assets. asserted
they → say → assets
That was evidenced by the team’s offer for Taylor. asserted
That → evidence → Taylor
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support