Photo via New York Post

Texas Dem group allegedly ‘paying’ for votes, operative claims in undercover video: ‘Shady as f–k’

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Christenson, J. (2026, September 16). Texas Dem group allegedly ‘paying’ for votes, operative claims in undercover video: ‘Shady as f–k’. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/16/us-news/texas-dem-group-allegedly-paying-for-votes-operative-claims-in-undercover-video-shady-as-f-k/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-16 · by Josh Christenson

Quick Summary

A video published by Townhall shows a Democratic operative admitting that Texas Majority PAC is offering $25 for people to attend one-hour Zoom classes about voting importance, effectively paying people indirectly to vote. The operative, Sky MacAdams, describes this as a "roundabout way" of compensating voters for their time and effort in mobilizing others to vote, though he acknowledges the practice may be legally questionable. Texas Majority PAC has spent $500,000 on such programs aimed at voter mobilization. Reps for the group did not respond to comments about the legality of these practices.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A Texas Democratic operative with Texas Majority PAC, an outside group backing Senate candidate James Talarico, was recorded admitting that his organization pays $25 per person for attendance at Zoom classes aimed at persuading voters. The classes highlight alleged negative actions by Republicans and are part of a "paid relational program" run by Relentless, which claims to have generated over 47,000 Democratic votes in key swing states during the 2024 elections. Federal law prohibits paying individuals directly for voting, with potential penalties including up to two years in prison. Critics argue these practices are unethical and undermine democratic integrity, while supporters suggest they merely encourage voter engagement through informational sessions. The revelation has sparked debate about the ethics of such tactics in electoral politics, especially amid claims that Republicans accuse Democrats of undermining democracy through similar but covert methods.

Written for “Voting Integrity” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Voting Integrity
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Independent
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles describe different incidents: one about Trump's comments regarding his plan to reward voters and Democrats' efforts in midterms, while the other reports on an alleged payment scheme by a Texas Democratic group for attending Zoom classes.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 29 claims Outlet record 70/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
17
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
3 of 17 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15765 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Christenson
60 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “I don’t think he’s gonna get fired immediately, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he was eventually pushed out,” the source said.
🔮 DJT will pardon me.”
🔮 Consular services will resume shortly,” Sienik added later.
🔮 Soriano is currently being held without bond, a rep for the Prince William County Adult Detention Center told The Post Friday.
🔮 Moscow’s foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said that Putin said “in principle” peace talks will continue after Nov. 10, following a meeting with US special envoy Steve Witkoff in St. Petersburg.
🔮 Tuesday’s talks centered on points in a proposal that will be presented to Russia the following day, laying out a framework for peace with Ukraine, security guarantees and “a broader European security architecture,” which could involve Ukraine joining the EU, as well as post-war plans for financial recovery, according to US officials and leaders who participated.
🔮 Given the case is being pursued as a general conspiracy, the evidence will prove useful even if some of the acts fall outside of the statute of limitations. “If you argue a conspiracy, you can allege overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy that are outside the statute of limitations,” said Neama Rahmini, a former federal prosecutor.
🔮 In December 2025, then-US Attorney Joe Thompson claimed as much as $9 billion in taxpayer funds may have been pilfered from state coffers since 2018 — the same year Democrat Tim Walz was first elected Minnesota governor.
🔮 “I will be transferring from our campaign in New York one million dollars to the state of Michigan to help support you all,” Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) told supporters at an event while stumping for El-Sayed in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula on Thursday.
2026-10-16 · assertive framing · AOC sends $1M to Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan Senate race
🔮 “Our auditors and investigators are zeroing in on this failure, and we will enforce full accountability.
Also by Josh Christenson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 60 articles by Josh Christenson →

Topics

Democratic Republicans Senate Texas Texas Majority PAC

Subjects

Texas Majority PAC ORG · 4× Democratic NORP · 3× Republicans NORP · 3× Senate ORG · 3× Texas GPE · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Relentless ORG · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Democrats NORP · 1× Townhall ORG · 1×

Narrative

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) accused Trump of “trying to bribe the American people for their votes” after the president announced his intention at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas last week. Texas Senate Democratic candidate James Talarico called the Trump checks an “election year stunt.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 McAdams added: “If I was a Republican, I would be pissed.

Claims (17 extracted, 3 hedged)

Texas Democrats have allegedly found a “roundabout” way to pay for votes in the critical Senate and governor’s races, according to an undercover video published Wednesday. uncertain
Democrats → find → video
A Democratic operative with Texas Majority PAC admitted in the new footage released by the conservative outlet Townhall that the group is shelling out $25 per person for attendance at Zoom classes that discuss “bad things” Republicans are doing. asserted
Republicans → admit → things
“We are paying people $25 to attend a one-hour Zoom class to learn why voting is important and why the Republicans are causing all of these bad things,” said Sky MacAdams, an organizing manager for Texas Majority PAC. asserted
MacAdams → pay → PAC
“So it’s like a roundabout way of paying people for their votes, essentially,” he added, calling the move a bit of a “gray” area. asserted
he → ’ → area
Federal law prohibits payments in exchange for voting or not voting for certain candidates, with violators potentially facing up to two years in prison. asserted
violators → prohibit → prison
The paid relational program, as its known, compensates low-propensity voters “for their time as they reach, persuade, and mobilize their friends and family to vote,” according to the website for Relentless, a political consulting firm. uncertain
they → know → Relentless
“You can’t pay someone to vote for someone,” MacAdams also noted. asserted
MacAdams → pay → someone
“You can’t be like, ‘Here’s $25, go vote for me.’ asserted
25 → ’ → me
You can say, ‘Attend a one-hour class and you can receive $25.’” asserted
you → say → 25
McAdams added: “If I was a Republican, I would be pissed. asserted
I → add → ?
I would be like, that’s shady as f–k.” asserted
that → ’ → f
Reps for Texas Majority PAC did not immediately respond to a request for comment. asserted
Reps → respond → comment
The group paid $500,000 to Relentless for its Relational Organizing Program in May of this year, according to a state campaign finance report. uncertain
group → pay → report
It’s spent more than $2.4 million in 2026 helping to mobilize voters for statewide, US House and the US Senate contests. asserted
It → spend → contests
President Trump was also accused of trying to buy votes in the midterm elections by promising $5,000 dividend checks if Republicans maintain control of both chambers of Congress. asserted
Republicans → accuse → Congress
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) accused Trump of “trying to bribe the American people for their votes” after the president announced his intention at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas last week. Texas Senate Democratic candidate James Talarico called the Trump checks an “election year stunt.” asserted
Talarico → accuse → checks
Talarico’s opponent and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has accused the Democratic challenger of doing the same after the Texas Majority PAC scheme surfaced. asserted
scheme → accuse → same
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support