Photo via Evening Standard

‘No war, no peace’ US-Iran stalemate needs to end, says Ed Miliband

Read the original at Evening Standard ↗
Cite

Lester, N. (2026, November 11). ‘No war, no peace’ US-Iran stalemate needs to end, says Ed Miliband. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband-foreign-secretary-iran-donald-trump-marco-rubio-b1304540.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Evening Standard · collected 2026-11-11 · by Nick Lester

Quick Summary

Ed Miliband, attending the G7 foreign ministers’ meeting in France, called for an end to the current stalemate between the US and Iran, describing it as economically detrimental. He urged for a comprehensive diplomatic effort to address nuclear threats and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which has been disrupted by Iranian attacks on shipping, leading to increased fuel prices. Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the US's efforts to secure maritime traffic in the strait while criticizing other countries for not contributing more to protect global shipping despite the risks involved.
Written by AI on 2026-11-11, from this article's own text only.

AI analysis

Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.45, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 3 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 146004: no verified evidence · logged 2026-11-11

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Times of India
Leans right Hedges 6 of 27 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the US-Iran situation, with Article A focusing on Ed Miliband's call for an end to the stalemate and Article B reporting on Trump's decision regarding economic pressure.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
20
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
1 of 20 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
Evening Standard's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
unclustered
not grouped into a story yet
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Evening Standard · 9633 article(s) · 74 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 74 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Nick Lester
65 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
But if there was risk of conflict, we wouldn’t need them.
If convicted, he would face at least 20 years in federal prison.
Mr Trump declared, last week, that there was going to be “a big, beautiful agreement” on Ukraine which “might involve all of Europe”.
Mr Trump declared, last week, that there was going to be “a big, beautiful agreement” on Ukraine which “might involve all of Europe”.
He argued putting him on trial would lead to the prosecution of “the men and women who carried out those orders tomorrow”.
He said: “I support the investigation and will co-operate fully.
He said: “I support the investigation and will co-operate fully.
The former Fox News presenter is holding a news conference on Tuesday – his first in more than 180 days – in the face of efforts on Capitol Hill to formally charge him with “high crimes and misdemeanours” and ultimately remove him from office. Giving an indication of the strategy he would adopt, Mr Hegseth claimed those levelling criticism at him were also “taking issue with the troops and what they accomplished”.
The former Fox News presenter is holding a news conference on Tuesday – his first in more than 180 days – in the face of efforts on Capitol Hill to formally charge him with “high crimes and misdemeanours” and ultimately remove him from office. Giving an indication of the strategy he would adopt, Mr Hegseth claimed those levelling criticism at him were also “taking issue with the troops and what they accomplished”.
He said: “I support the investigation and will co-operate fully.
Also by Nick Lester
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 65 articles by Nick Lester →

Topics

France Iran Tehran Washington state

Subjects

Iran GPE · 3× Rubio PERSON · 3× France GPE · 2× state ORG · 2× Iranians NORP · 1× Israel GPE · 1× Marco Rubio PERSON · 1× Miliband PERSON · 1× Tehran GPE · 1× Washington GPE · 1×

Narrative

Speaking this week at the G7, Mr Rubio said: “We shouldn’t have to defend global shipping, but in this particular case, because the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) is intent upon trying to sink these ships, we’ll continue to do that and have been doing it quite effectively.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-11
But if there was risk of conflict, we wouldn’t need them.
2026-11-11 · Evening Standard
‘No war, no peace’ US-Iran stalemate needs to end, says Ed Miliband · assertive framing

Claims (20 extracted, 1 hedged)

The US president said: “We’re just keeping it the status quo.” asserted
We → say → it
While welcoming the reduced chance of a return to major combat, the Foreign Secretary stressed a need to move beyond the current impasse. asserted
Secretary → welcome → impasse
Mr Miliband, who attended this week’s G7 foreign ministers’ meeting in France, said: “The status quo is bad economically for us and it’s not a stable equilibrium. asserted
it → attend → us
“We need to move beyond the ‘no war, no peace’ stalemate, which is causing deep economic pain for our countries. asserted
which → need → countries
“We must see an all-out diplomatic effort to end this conflict, prevent a nuclear Iran and the threats it poses around the world, and get the Strait of Hormuz properly reopened. asserted
Strait → see → Hormuz
Despite continued claims in Washington that Iran’s military has been wiped out, Tehran has continued to attack shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, which has disrupted oil supplies and sent fuel prices soaring. uncertain
which → continue → prices
The Gulf channel had been fully open to vessels before the US and Israel launched hostilities earlier this year, aimed at preventing Iran getting a nuclear weapon. asserted
Iran → launch → weapon
US secretary of state Marco Rubio insisted “oil is getting out”, but acknowledged the Iranians “are still launching a couple drones a night trying to sink commercial vessels” and renewed his call for other countries to help protect maritime traffic. asserted
countries → insist → traffic
The White House has previously criticised the response of the UK and other allies, insisting they need the waterway more than the US. asserted
they → criticise → US
Speaking this week at the G7, Mr Rubio said: “We shouldn’t have to defend global shipping, but in this particular case, because the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) is intent upon trying to sink these ships, we’ll continue to do that and have been doing it quite effectively.” asserted
we → speak → it
Mr Rubio said he had raised the idea of other countries assisting but claimed he “didn’t get a response”, and again argued they “should step up”. asserted
they → say → response
Britain and France had spearheaded plans for a defensive mission to secure freedom of navigation in the channel after the war – an initiative derided by Mr Trump and branded a “catch-22” by Mr Rubio. asserted
Britain → spearhead → Rubio
The US secretary of state said: “Part of the challenge we have is there’s countries out there that say, well, we’re ready to provide forces to help defend shipping once there’s no risk of conflict. “ asserted
we → say → conflict
But if there was risk of conflict, we wouldn’t need them. asserted
we → be → them
So it’s kind of a catch-22. asserted
it → ’ → catch-22
“Look, we’re going to continue to do it, we’ve done it quite effectively. asserted
we → look → it
“Frankly, we think it’s in the interest of the world to protect shipping, because the US doesn’t get any oil from there. asserted
US → think → oil
“We don’t rely on Middle East energy for our own economy. asserted
We → rely → economy
So I think these countries should step up. asserted
countries → think → ?
I think a couple are thinking about it, to be honest with you.” asserted
couple → think → you
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support