Some Senate Republicans are open to revisiting immigration policy after President Donald Trump floated a possible deal with Democrats, but they insist amnesty remains off the table.
asserted
amnesty → revisit → table
Republicans, after sweeping midterm losses, are willing to open up the immigration policy debate after voters made clear that they didn't support the administration’s approach: a Fox News poll published in September found that 53% of voters believed that Trump's immigration policy had gone too far.
asserted
policy → open → voters
But there’s one thing that Senate Republicans won’t agree to: amnesty.
asserted
Republicans → ’ → that
"I trust President Trump," Sen. Jim Banks, R-Ind., told Fox News Digital.
asserted
Banks → trust → Digital
"He's gonna do what's right, but as far as I'm concerned, amnesty is off the table.
asserted
amnesty → go → table
I'll never go for it."
asserted
I → go → it
The door creaked open on the idea when Trump, during an interview with "60 Minutes" that aired over the weekend, said that his administration’s mass deportation and enforcement policies might be "too tough."
"Get the killers out, get the rapists out, get all the rough ones out, get the drug dealers out," Trump said.
uncertain
Trump → creak → dealers
"But let the people that are here — and in some cases here for 10 and 15 years — work a deal for them."
asserted
that → let → them
The administration quickly sought to clarify Trump’s comments, with Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin affirming that there would be "no amnesty" shortly after.
asserted
Mullin → seek → comments
Still, Republicans are willing to navigate the complex issue as Democrats gear up to take power next year.
asserted
Democrats → navigate → power
Some have been calling for action on the matter for months.
asserted
Some → call → months
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., one of the administration’s sharper Republican critics on immigration policy who is retiring at the end of the year, told Fox News Digital that as early as March he texted Trump and suggested it would be the "perfect time" to codify "all the stuff that has effectively sealed the border and used it as an opportunity to get merit-based immigration reform.
uncertain
that → retire → reform
"
"I also said in that text, though, was, in order for this to be successful, Stephen Miller either needs to be out of the room or on his meds," Tillis said.
asserted
Tillis → say → meds
"And so he's the reason they're walking it back is because they don't want to do it, because they have some false assumption that that's gonna hurt our base."
asserted
that → walk → base
"Our base is fine with merit-based immigration reform.
asserted
base → base → reform
President Trump is fine with merit-based immigration reform," he continued.
asserted
he → base → reform
"And if we don't get the stuff codified that has effectively sealed the border, it's gonna be on them when the border gets opened up if a Democrat wins in ‘28."
asserted
Democrat → get → 28
The Senate, just before Trump won the 2024 election, was on the cusp of a bipartisan immigration deal when Democrats controlled the chamber.
asserted
Democrats → win → chamber
The deal collapsed after Trump criticized it and Senate Republicans withdrew support.
asserted
Republicans → collapse → support
"There's a lot of scar tissue on this issue, but, you know, the president, because he secured the borders, he has credibility on the issue, and he has expressed a willingness," Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said.
asserted
Thune → be → willingness
"I have not seen anything yet that's being proposed, but we will certainly hear them out, and if there's something he wants to do there, have a conversation about it.
asserted
he → see → it
The bipartisan deal was the product of negotiations among Sens. James Lankford, R-Okla., Chris Murphy, D-Conn., and former Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, and would have funneled billions for border security and shuttered the border to most asylum seekers, among several other policy changes.
asserted
deal → funnel → changes
But conservatives balked at the deal, and Trump’s influence from the campaign trail ultimately killed it.
asserted
influence → balk → it
Years later, Lankford is again in a prime position to work on a deal with Democrats, given that he is expected to become the ranking Republican on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee next year.
asserted
he → work → Committee
"If I’m ranking on Homeland Security, I’m right in the thick of it, whether you like it or not," Lankford said.
asserted
Lankford → rank → it
Though opinions vary on what exactly the GOP’s approach would be going forward, many Republicans agree that the administration’s enforcement policies, particularly under former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, should not make a comeback.
asserted
policies → vary → comeback
"I think you have to make sure, first and foremost, that how you do your enforcement is not like the administration started under Kristi Noem," Sen. Ted Budd, R-N.C., told Fox News Digital.
asserted
Budd → think → Digital
"I think people are for some enforcement, but not in a cruel way.
asserted
people → think → way
And there were so many, there was a lack of training, lack of proper methodologies, and I think people want to take enforcement seriously.
asserted
people → be → enforcement
"
"But, again, I would say no amnesty at all," he continued.
asserted
he → say → amnesty
"We don't want to go there.
asserted
We → want → ?
And I don't think Trump wants to make that mistake."
asserted
Trump → think → mistake
The Aporia
-67.png)
