Photo via The Daily Wire

Senate GOP Races To Confirm Trump Judges Before Democrats Take Control

Read the original at The Daily Wire ↗
Cite

Berkemeyer, D. (2026, November 12). Senate GOP Races To Confirm Trump Judges Before Democrats Take Control. The Daily Wire. https://www.dailywire.com/news/senate-gop-races-to-confirm-trump-judges-before-democrats-take-control

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Daily Wire · collected 2026-11-12 · by Drew Berkemeyer

Quick Summary

Senate Republicans are attempting to confirm at least 25 of President Donald Trump’s judicial nominees, including four appeals court and 21 district court picks, before Democrats take control of the chamber in January. Republicans have already confirmed 56 Article III judges during the current term and aim to maximize their remaining majority to fill federal court vacancies. The reporting highlights the political tension between the parties, with Republican Chairman Chuck Grassley accusing Democrats of planning to stonewall future appointments while Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin criticizes the GOP for shortening review periods and proceeding before FBI checks are cleared.
Written by AI on 2026-11-13, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).
See how they differ ↓

AI analysis

Story summary

President Donald Trump is urging the U.S. Senate to confirm his outstanding nominees before the Democrats take control of the chamber in January. The president highlighted the importance of confirming 161 pending nominations, which include 25 federal judges, via a Truth Social post. This push follows a shift in power where Democrats won the majority in both houses last Tuesday, flipping the Senate after winning seven seats while votes remain pending in Alaska and Mississippi. Senate Republicans are moving at the fastest pace since the Reagan administration to maximize their remaining 54 days of power. The Senate Republican Conference aims to confirm 25 more nominees, including four appeals court picks and 21 district court picks, to secure a majority for Trump appointees on a federal appeals court for the first time. While Senate Majority Leader John Thune pledged to keep the chamber in session as long as necessary, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer vowed to block any conservative-leaning Supreme Court nominees. Senator Dick Durbin criticized the speed of the process, accusing Republicans of cutting corners by proceeding with hearings before FBI background checks were cleared.

Written for “Trump's judicial nominations” on 2026-11-13, grounded in this article and the 3 other(s) covering the same event.

How they differ

3 outlets covered “Trump's judicial nominations”.

What each outlet says

One AI summary per outlet of its latest article on this story, written from that article alone and checked against it. Open the article for the outlet's own words.

The Daily WireThis outlet12 Nov

Senate Republicans are attempting to confirm at least 25 of President Donald Trump’s judicial nominees, including four appeals court and 21 district court picks, before Democrats take control of the chamber in January. Republicans have already confirmed 56 Article III judges during the current term and aim to maximize their remaining majority to fill federal court vacancies. The reporting highlights the political…

Senate GOP Races To Confirm Trump Judges Before Democrats Take Control (this article)
Just the News12 Nov

President Trump is urging Republicans to speed up the confirmation process for his remaining 161 judicial nominations before Democrats take control of Congress in January. This move mirrors what Democrats did for Joe Biden's nominees two years ago when they controlled the Senate near the end of Obama’s term. Current Majority Leader John Thune has agreed with the GOP conference to maximize their time, but Democrats…

Democrats did it for Biden. Now Trump wants the same lame-duck judicial blitz →2 articles from Just the News on this story
Washington Examiner10 Nov

President Donald Trump is urging the Senate to confirm 25 pending federal judge nominees before Republicans lose their majority in January. This push faces resistance from Arkansas’s senators over one particular nominee, which if confirmed would give Trump appointees a majority on a federal appeals court for the first time. Trump emphasized this priority by posting about it on Truth Social.

Trump calls on Senate to confirm remaining 25 judges amid Arkansas senator friction →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor
Leans right Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Senate proceedings: Article A focuses on the internal debate and leadership changes among Senate Republicans after the election, while Article B discusses the confirmation of Trump's judicial nominees before Democrats take control.”
Fox News
Hedges 6 of 21 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss related but distinct aspects of the same situation, with Article A focusing on the threat to Trump's judicial agenda due to Democrats taking control, while Article B covers Senate Republicans' efforts to confirm Trump's judicial nominees before Democrats take over.”
Daily Mail
Leans left Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different aspects of Senate activities; Article A focuses on John Thune's leadership role and internal party conflict, while Article B discusses the Senate's efforts to confirm Trump's judicial nominees before Democrats take control.”
Reason
Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 49 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of judicial nominations; Article A focuses on specific judges and a refusal of a nomination, while Article B discusses the broader process of Senate Republicans confirming Trump's nominees before Democrats take control.”
Washington Examiner
Leans left Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the confirmation process for Trump's judicial nominees, with Article A focusing on specific holdouts and tactics by Sen. Tillis, while Article B discusses the broader effort by Senate Republicans to confirm nominees before the Democrats take control.”
Just The News
Hedges 7 of 32 claims Outlet record 94/100
Reason
Leans left Hedges 2 of 87 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of judicial nominations, with Article A focusing on Justice Cody Hiland's criticism of the President's nomination decision, while Article B discusses the broader efforts of Senate Republicans to confirm Trump's judicial nominees before Democrats take control.”
Fox News
Hedges 6 of 23 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Senate Republicans' efforts before losing control to Democrats, with Article A focusing on general legislative plans and Article B on confirming judicial nominees.”
Just The News
Hedges 0 of 11 claims Outlet record 94/100
“Article A focuses on Trump urging the Senate to confirm all his nominees before the year-end, while Article B specifically discusses the confirmation of judicial nominees before Democrats take control, indicating a narrower focus on a particular type of nomination.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss the same general topic of confirming Trump's judicial nominees before Democrats take control, but they describe different stages of the process and different specific dates.”

Story

Trump's judicial nominations
Politics · 4 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↑
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
25
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
3 of 25 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
59/100
The Daily Wire's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
4
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-13 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Daily Wire · 230 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Drew Berkemeyer
25 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-SC) is demanding testimony from former Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick as Congress investigates allegations that a businesswoman linked to the chipmaker may have helped China obtain sensitive American technology.
The group also warned Democrats that failing to deliver on their agenda could jeopardize the party’s prospects in the 2028 elections.
The ship is expected to become a major attraction for recreational divers.
The final weeks of Republican control could be President Donald Trump’s last opportunity to secure judicial confirmations with a GOP majority.
The 43-year-old district attorney will be the first black senator from Mississippi since Blanche K. Bruce, a Republican who was born into slavery and served from 1875 to 1881.
The indictment alleges that al-Hassani arranged for associates to obtain three vans, barrels of fuel, chemical accelerants, and metal objects that could be used as shrapnel.
“Secretary Bessent will not be deterred by the Iranian regime’s threats,” a Treasury Department spokesperson said in a statement to the Times, adding that he remains committed to the administration’s effort to squeeze Iran’s economy.
Massie had attempted to launch impeachment proceedings before the midterm elections in September, but the House was adjourned before representatives could come to a vote.
The pardon covered federal offenses Hunter had committed or may have committed between January 1, 2014, and December 1, 2024.
Van Hollen told reporters Monday that he is in “listening mode” about a possible leadership bid and wants Democrats to discuss how they will use their majority before choosing who will lead it.
Also by Drew Berkemeyer
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 25 articles by Drew Berkemeyer →

Topics

Congress Democrats GOP Republicans Senate

Subjects

Democrats NORP · 8× Republicans NORP · 7× Trump PERSON · 6× Senate ORG · 4× GOP ORG · 3× Talarico PERSON · 3× Congress ORG · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Thune PERSON · 2×

Narrative

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, accused Republicans of cutting corners, criticizing shortened review periods and the committee’s decision to proceed with hearings before FBI background checks had been cleared by Senate staff.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-13
The final weeks of Republican control could be President Donald Trump’s last opportunity to secure judicial confirmations with a GOP majority.
2026-11-13 · The Daily Wire
Senate GOP Races To Confirm Trump Judges Before Democrats Take Control · assertive framing

Claims (25 extracted, 3 hedged)

Senate Republicans are racing to confirm President Donald Trump’s judicial nominees before Democrats take control of the chamber in January, seeking to fill as many federal court vacancies as possible while they still have the votes. asserted
they → race → votes
Republicans have already confirmed 56 Article III judges during Trump’s second term, according to the Senate Republican Conference, which highlighted the confirmations Thursday. uncertain
which → confirm → confirmations
GOP leaders hope to confirm as many as 25 more nominees before the new Congress convenes, including four appeals court nominees and 21 district court picks. asserted
Congress → hope → nominees
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) has pledged to keep the chamber in session as long as necessary to advance the president’s nominees. asserted
Thune → pledge → nominees
“We’re going to make the most of the time that we’ve got,” Thune said, according to the New York Times. uncertain
Thune → go → Times
The final weeks of Republican control could be President Donald Trump’s last opportunity to secure judicial confirmations with a GOP majority. uncertain
weeks → secure → majority
Democrats will gain the power to control the confirmation schedule in January, potentially leaving vacancies unfilled for the remainder of his presidency. asserted
Democrats → gain → presidency
“If the Senate doesn’t do this now, it’s unlikely President Trump will be able to fill these positions in the next Congress,” Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), a member of the Judiciary Committee, wrote. asserted
Lee → do → Committee
Thursday’s schedule included a confirmation vote on Gregory Carl Cook for the Northern District of Alabama, followed by procedural votes advancing Daniel Desmond Domenico for the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals and Anna St. John for the 5th Circuit. asserted
schedule → include → Circuit
Earlier this week, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee advanced several nominees, including four district court candidates. asserted
Republicans → advance → candidates
Three of those nominations cleared the committee on party-line votes, while another received support from some Democrats. asserted
another → clear → Democrats
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) accused Democrats of preparing to block Trump’s judicial appointments once they take control. “ asserted
they → accuse → control
I want to be very clear. asserted
I → want → ?
Some Democrats so despise President Trump that for the first time in our nation’s history they’re planning to stonewall a president’s ability to appoint judges,” Grassley said. asserted
Grassley → despise → judges
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, accused Republicans of cutting corners, criticizing shortened review periods and the committee’s decision to proceed with hearings before FBI background checks had been cleared by Senate staff. asserted
checks → accuse → staff
“Why?” Durbin said. asserted
Durbin → say → ?
“Because Republicans are losing the majority and they are afraid that unqualified MAGA loyalists won’t withstand close scrutiny when Democrats are in the majority. asserted
Democrats → lose → majority
The dispute has become particularly contentious over two judicial nominees in Texas, where Democrat James Talarico defeated Republican nominee Ken Paxton in the November midterms. asserted
Talarico → become → midterms
Following Talarico’s victory, Trump nominated James Sullivan, a member of the Texas Supreme Court who lost his reelection bid, and Elliot Gaiser, a former Justice Department official, to federal district court vacancies in the state. asserted
who → follow → state
Democrats accused Republicans of trying to fill the vacancies before Talarico can exercise the traditional home-state senator’s role in reviewing judicial nominees. asserted
Talarico → accuse → nominees
For district court nominees, that includes the “blue slip” process, through which home-state senators signal their approval or opposition. asserted
senators → include → approval
Durbin argued that Talarico should have the opportunity to weigh in on the appointments. asserted
Talarico → argue → appointments
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) acknowledged that Gaiser’s nomination had not gone through the usual review process established by him and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), saying he would examine the nominee’s record before deciding whether to support him. asserted
he → acknowledge → him
Republicans can confirm judges by a simple majority, but Democrats can force procedural votes that consume floor time, putting pressure on GOP leaders to keep senators in Washington and their caucus united. asserted
that → confirm → Washington
Trump appointed 234 federal judges during his first term, including three Supreme Court justices who helped establish the court’s current 6-3 conservative majority. asserted
who → appoint → majority
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support