Photo via The Guardian

The datacenter industry is using propaganda to fight opposition | Samuel Woolley, Dean Jackson and Maia Woluchem

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Woolley, S., Jackson, D., & Woluchem, M. (2026, November 13). The datacenter industry is using propaganda to fight opposition | Samuel Woolley, Dean Jackson and Maia Woluchem. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/13/datacenter-industry-propaganda

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-11-13 · by Samuel Woolley, Dean Jackson, Maia Woluchem

Quick Summary

This analysis piece argues that the datacenter industry employs propaganda, disinformation, and opaque funding to undermine community opposition and manufacture public consent. The authors highlight how corporate-tied non-profits mask their origins while using targeted advertising and technical jargon, such as "closed-loop cooling," to deflect from environmental impacts. The report specifically identifies misleading claims regarding job creation and tax revenue, noting that figures like the 57,785 jobs cited in Texas often omit permanent roles or the substantial tax abatements that offset community benefits.
Written by AI on 2026-11-13, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 10% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Leans strongly left Hedges 5 of 63 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the datacenter and AI industry, with Article A focusing on political outcomes from the midterms, and Article B on the industry's use of propaganda to counter opposition.”
NBC News
Outlet record 77/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the data center industry and its public relations efforts, rather than the same specific incident.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 21 claims Outlet record 61/100
“Article A describes specific protests and concerns that led Goodman Group to back away from building a data center in Lane Cove, while Article B discusses a broader industry-wide tactic of using propaganda to counter community opposition to data centers.”

Story

The datacenter industry is using propaganda to fight
Other · 1 article(s) covering the same event.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
40
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
4 of 40 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
65/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Other
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-13 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2413 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Samuel Woolley
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
But while these approaches can mitigate consumption, the effect is smaller than often implied: closed-loop systems may simply shift demand for water up the supply chain to power plants, while behind-the-meter generators still rely on the grid for backup and stability while competing with it for components.
The New York City mayor, Zohran Mamdani, uses a network of friendly (unpaid) influencers to communicate with gen Z.
Also by Samuel Woolley
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
Dean Jackson
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
But while these approaches can mitigate consumption, the effect is smaller than often implied: closed-loop systems may simply shift demand for water up the supply chain to power plants, while behind-the-meter generators still rely on the grid for backup and stability while competing with it for components.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.
Maia Woluchem
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
But while these approaches can mitigate consumption, the effect is smaller than often implied: closed-loop systems may simply shift demand for water up the supply chain to power plants, while behind-the-meter generators still rely on the grid for backup and stability while competing with it for components.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Americans Antifa Build American AI Chinese Elevate New Mexico

Subjects

Chinese NORP · 2× Americans NORP · 1× Andreessen Horowitz ORG · 1× Antifa ORG · 1× Build American AI ORG · 1× Elevate New Mexico ORG · 1× Lead the Future ORG · 1× OpenAI ORG · 1× Texas ORG · 1× The Dalles GPE · 1×

Narrative

- Samuel Woolley is the Dietrich chair of disinformation studies and directs the Communication Technology Research Lab (CTRL) at the University of Pittsburgh - Dean Jackson is a senior fellow at the Communication Technology Research Lab and a contributing editor at Tech Policy Press - Maia Woluchem is the director of Data & Society’s Trustworthy Infrastructures Program and a research fellow at the Communication Technology Research Lab
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-13
But while these approaches can mitigate consumption, the effect is smaller than often implied: closed-loop systems may simply shift demand for water up the supply chain to power plants, while behind-the-meter generators still rely on the grid for backup and stability while competing with it for components.

Claims (40 extracted, 4 hedged)

Everyone from tech leaders to the president has called datacenter resistance a “documented psyop” and a “Chinese PR thing”. asserted
Everyone → call → resistance
But why do they make these claims? uncertain
they → make → claims
Our new research finds that the datacenter industry uses propaganda, disinformation, and information control to mold public opinion and undermine community opposition. asserted
industry → find → opposition
Big tech’s opening pitch about datacenters was typical: they told Americans that these facilities brought jobs and tax revenue. asserted
facilities → tell → jobs
They spread this message through mailers, text messages, TV spots and targeted digital ads. asserted
They → spread → mailers
But much of the spending behind these multimedia campaigns flowed through opaque non-profits and dark money groups with tech industry ties, hiding the source of these efforts. asserted
much → flow → efforts
Groups like “Elevate New Mexico” have passed themselves off as local initiatives while obscuring their connections to corporate entities in the datacenter space. asserted
Groups → pass → space
As environmental concerns mounted, the industry turned to misdirection and jargon to obscure datacenters’ impact. asserted
industry → mount → impact
Developers continue to use terms such as “closed-loop cooling” and “behind-the-meter power” to deflect concerns about water and power consumption. asserted
Developers → continue → consumption
But while these approaches can mitigate consumption, the effect is smaller than often implied: closed-loop systems may simply shift demand for water up the supply chain to power plants, while behind-the-meter generators still rely on the grid for backup and stability while competing with it for components. uncertain
generators → mitigate → components
They are often presented without any context. asserted
They → present → context
To give an example, an ad by Build American AI – an industry advocacy group connected to Lead the Future, an industry Pac funded by OpenAI and Andreessen Horowitz – boasts that datacenters have created 57,785 jobs in Texas. asserted
datacenters → give → Texas
But industry figures can also be misleading: of the promised jobs, how many are permanent jobs remaining after construction? asserted
jobs → promise → construction
How many are cafeteria workers, landscapers, and custodial staff – who often work for subcontractors without benefits? asserted
who → work → benefits
And are those subcontractors included when industry reports the average salaries for the jobs they do create? asserted
they → include → jobs
A similar story applies to other tax benefits. asserted
story → apply → benefits
When companies mention the tax revenue they bring to communities, they rarely include the exemptions and abatements they received. asserted
they → mention → exemptions
Those incentives are often unnecessary to attract projects and eat directly into budgets for schools and social services. asserted
incentives → attract → schools
Some jurisdictions even track the precise number of dollars they forgo through such abatements. asserted
they → track → abatements
But even when agreements allow communities to claw back money from underperforming projects, local leaders are often hesitant to do so because they don’t want to admit a project has failed. asserted
project → allow → projects
The industry fights to keep critical details about projects under wraps, sometimes working with local authorities to do so. asserted
industry → fight → authorities
In The Dalles, Oregon, for example, Google paid the city’s legal fees after it withheld records about a datacenter’s water use. asserted
it → pay → use
(The city agreed to release the information in a settlement with the Oregonian newspaper.) asserted
city → agree → newspaper
Most datacenters do not report their water consumption at all, hampering policymaking. asserted
datacenters → report → policymaking
As for the public, their visibility into the process is limited by non-disclosure agreements. asserted
visibility → limit → agreements
Local and state officials, operating in a low-information environment and starved of resources by anti-tax policies, welcomed these facilities at first. asserted
officials → operate → facilities
With time, some government officials have joined them. asserted
officials → join → them
Yet, local organizers and activists told us that they now see decisions about their economic future as pre-determined by big business and opaque governments. asserted
decisions → tell → business
They criticized the lack of transparency, the late stage at which the public was consulted, and community benefits agreements they felt were inadequate compared to the burdens they were being asked to bear: higher electric costs, air pollution, noise, water depletion, and a change in the character of their communities. asserted
they → criticize → communities
Industrial tycoons have historically manipulated leaders, laws, and regulations to their advantage. asserted
tycoons → manipulate → advantage
Perhaps that is why the industry has stooped to smearing its opponents as useful stooges of foreign propaganda. asserted
industry → stoop → propaganda
In May, Kevin O’Leary – the millionaire Shark Tank star who is developing one of the world’s largest datacenters – called two activists “proxies for the Chinese government”. uncertain
who → develop → government
He later admitted he had “no evidence”. asserted
he → admit → evidence
Even so, similar theories have gained traction among tech executives and Washington policymakers. asserted
theories → gain → executives
And it has percolated to the local level, where activists and organizers tell us they face this invective – and much more – online. asserted
they → percolate → invective
The irony is that datacenter proponents are often the ones relying on disinformation and other information manipulation tactics to make their case. asserted
proponents → rely → case
Government decision-makers should not give credence to top-down claims from Silicon Valley or the broader datacenter industry suggesting community opposition is somehow propelled by China. uncertain
opposition → give → China
Instead, policymakers should create and enforce mandatory transparency requirements and other provisions forcing datacenters to keep their promises and provide critical data about resource consumption, job creation and other matters of public concern. asserted
policymakers → create → concern
Those transparency requirements should extend to the permissive environment for advertising and campaign finance in which disinformation and coordinated astroturf movements thrive. asserted
disinformation → extend → which
- Samuel Woolley is the Dietrich chair of disinformation studies and directs the Communication Technology Research Lab (CTRL) at the University of Pittsburgh - Dean Jackson is a senior fellow at the Communication Technology Research Lab and a contributing editor at Tech Policy Press - Maia Woluchem is the director of Data & Society’s Trustworthy Infrastructures Program and a research fellow at the Communication Technology Research Lab asserted
Woluchem → direct → Lab
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support