The Aporia
Content, T. C. (2026, November 13). When AI gets it wrong, employers could pay the price. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/sponsored-sections/when-ai-gets-it-wrong-employers-could-pay-the-price/article_dcadc3e3-efdf-4ce6-8bd6-3e5d6d4f5ebb.html
Content, Torstar Commercial. “When AI gets it wrong, employers could pay the price.” Toronto Star, 13 Nov. 2026, https://www.thestar.com/sponsored-sections/when-ai-gets-it-wrong-employers-could-pay-the-price/article_dcadc3e3-efdf-4ce6-8bd6-3e5d6d4f5ebb.html.
Content, Torstar Commercial. “When AI gets it wrong, employers could pay the price.” Toronto Star, November 13, 2026. https://www.thestar.com/sponsored-sections/when-ai-gets-it-wrong-employers-could-pay-the-price/article_dcadc3e3-efdf-4ce6-8bd6-3e5d6d4f5ebb.html.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
Hyde HR Law, a Toronto-based employment and labour law firm, has observed an increase in companies overly relying on AI for HR tasks, such as drafting contracts and termination letters. John Hyde, the founder and a certified specialist in labour and employment law, warns that AI's convenience can lead to costly mistakes. For instance, improper wording in termination letters or contracts can make them legally unenforceable or open to litigation. Hyde notes that AI might produce outdated or contextually inappropriate clauses, highlighting the risks of over-reliance on AI in HR.
Hyde HR Law, a Toronto-based employment and labour law firm, has seen a noticeable rise in companies that rely too heavily on generative AI for help with everything from drafting contracts, workplace policies and termination letters, to answering sensitive employee questions, responding to demand letters and even communicating with lawyers.
Hyde cautions that using AI to handle legal matters can put solicitor-client privilege at risk, particularly when confidential information or privileged legal advice is uploaded to an AI platform.
Hyde points to a case heard in British Columbia earlier this year, in which the Court of Appeal raised concerns about AI-generated legal arguments, including fabricated legal authorities and irrelevant citations.