Photo via The Daily Caller

Gun-Rights Group Asks Judge To Stick With Ruling That Tossed ‘Ghost Gun’ Ban

Read the original at The Daily Caller ↗
Cite

Hutchison, H. (2026, November 13). Gun-Rights Group Asks Judge To Stick With Ruling That Tossed ‘Ghost Gun’ Ban. The Daily Caller. https://dailycaller.com/2026/11/13/gun-rights-group-asks-appeals-court-to-stick-with-ruling-that-tossed-ghost-gun-ban

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Daily Caller · collected 2026-11-13 · by Harold Hutchison

Quick Summary

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) asked Judge Maryellen Noreika to reject Delaware’s request to reconsider her September ruling that Delaware’s ban on so-called “ghost guns” violated the Second Amendment. In her original ruling, Noreika upheld that incomplete frames or receivers are protected under the Second Amendment. Delaware argues that the serialization requirement for firearms is not a significant burden on gun rights and should be upheld. The FPC contends that the state’s request is moot and that the amendment to the statute does not address the constitutional issues.
Written by AI on 2026-11-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) has asked a federal judge to uphold her September ruling that struck down Delaware’s ban on so-called “ghost guns.” In her ruling, Judge Maryellen Noreika, a Trump appointee, declared that Delaware’s ban on incomplete frames or receivers violated the Second Amendment. The FPC argues that the recent statutory amendment by Delaware does not address the constitutional issues and that the plaintiffs have suffered irreparable injury due to the deprivation of their right to self-manufacture firearms. The FPC maintains that the state’s request for reconsideration should be rejected, asserting that the constitutional defects remain unresolved.

Written for “Gun Rights Group Challenges Ghost Gun Ban” on 2026-11-15, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Story

Gun Rights Group Challenges Ghost Gun Ban
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
25
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 25 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
92/100
The Daily Caller's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Daily Caller · 235 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Harold Hutchison
7 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
“We fully expect the Court to agree with our position on Viramontes, but regardless of the Court’s decision, this issue will be heard.
Orthodox Jews do not drive to their synagogues to worship, because they believe doing so would break the prohibition on “creative work” on the Sabbath.
Senior United States Circuit Judges Reena Raggi and Debra Ann Livington, both George W. Bush appointees, and United States Circuit Judge Michael H. Park, a Trump appointee, ruled that multiple provisions of the law, which include a limit on how any guns could be listed on a carry permit and a limit of one handgun purchase every 90 days, potentially violated Second Amendment rights.
I have a gun and I will shoot them right now,” Giamanco told the dispatcher.
The DOJ warned Montgomery County that its legislation could leave worshipers defenseless against an attack before it filed its lawsuit.
Also by Harold Hutchison
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Harold Hutchison →

Topics

Delaware FPC The Firearms Policy Coalition United States the Second Amendment

Subjects

FPC ORG · 6× Delaware GPE · 5× Democratic NORP · 2× Noreika PERSON · 2× United States GPE · 2× Maryellen Noreika PERSON · 1× The Firearms Policy Coalition ORG · 1× Transit Authority’s ORG · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× the District of Delaware GPE · 1×

Narrative

Even if a right to self-manufacture firearms were protected by the Second Amendment, the serialization requirement that the Enjoined Statutes place on all firearms, whether self-manufactured or not, represents at most an incidental burden that is constitutional at step one of Bruen,” Democratic Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings claimed in a motion filed in October.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-15
2026-11-15 · The Daily Caller
Gun-Rights Group Asks Judge To Stick With Ruling That Tossed ‘Ghost Gun’ Ban · assertive framing

Claims (25 extracted, 0 hedged)

The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) asked a federal judge Thursday to reject Delaware’s request that she reconsider her ruling in a case involving so-called “ghost guns.” asserted
she → ask → guns
In a ruling issued in September, United States District Judge Maryellen Noreika of the District of Delaware, a Trump appointee, said Delaware’s ban of the incomplete frames or receivers violated the Second Amendment. asserted
ban → issue → Amendment
The FPC asked Noreika to reject the state’s request in a brief. asserted
FPC → ask → brief
(RELATED: It Took College Student Just 4 Weeks To End Transit Authority’s No Guns Rule) asserted
It → take → Rule
“The case is not moot because the statutory amendment did not cure the constitutional defects. asserted
amendment → cure → defects
There is no safe harbor for self-manufactured firearms, and the safe harbor for possession is limited to firearms possessed before the statute’s effective date,” FPC argued. asserted
FPC → be → date
“Moreover, the plain text of the safe harbor does not allow Plaintiffs Rigby and Knight to reacquire the firearms and components that they have already relinquished. asserted
they → allow → that
“The deprivation of Plaintiffs’ constitutionally protected rights, including their right to self-manufacture, constitutes irreparable injury, and there is no public interest in enforcing unconstitutional laws,” FPC continued. asserted
FPC → protect → laws
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FPC TO DELAWARE: YOU LOST. asserted
YOU → delaware → RELEASE
YOU DON’T GET A DO-OVER ON YOUR UNCONSTITUTIONAL "GHOST GUN" BANS asserted
YOU → get → BANS
After losing in federal court, Delaware tries to resurrect its unconstitutional bans on self-manufactured firearms by pretending they’re something else. asserted
they → lose → firearms
FPC fires back. asserted
FPC → fire → ?
— Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy) November 13, 2026 In its request, Delaware claimed that the ruling should be reconsidered since the serialization requirement was not a significant burden on gun rights. asserted
requirement → claim → rights
“The Court committed clear error by finding the manufacture of firearms is protected by plain text of the Second Amendment. asserted
manufacture → commit → Amendment
Even if a right to self-manufacture firearms were protected by the Second Amendment, the serialization requirement that the Enjoined Statutes place on all firearms, whether self-manufactured or not, represents at most an incidental burden that is constitutional at step one of Bruen,” Democratic Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings claimed in a motion filed in October. asserted
Jennings → manufacture → October
In her September decision, Noreika said that the incomplete frames or receivers were still “arms” under the protection of the Second Amendment. asserted
frames → say → Amendment
“Firearm frames and receivers are likewise ‘Arms’ under the Second Amendment,” Norieka wrote. asserted
Norieka → write → Amendment
“To start, under federal law, the term ‘‘firearm’ includes [] ‘the frame or receiver’’ of any gun. asserted
term → start → gun
That indicates that unfinished frames and receivers are not functionally different from firearms and enjoy the same Second Amendment protections. asserted
frames → indicate → protections
Moreover, a frame or receiver is ‘necessary for [] a gun to function as intended,’ so in this Circuit, a frame or receiver constitutes an ‘Arm’ under the Second Amendment.” asserted
frame → function → Amendment
(RELATED: Gun-Rights Group Asks Supreme Court To Put Blue State’s Gun Ban Appeal On Ice) asserted
Court → ask → Ice
The Biden administration’s regulations were initially upheld by the Supreme Court in a 7-2 decision in 2025 because they were similar to certain restrictions on the First Amendment, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh joining the three liberal justices to keep the regulations in place. asserted
Roberts → uphold → place
However, efforts targeting the so-called “ghost guns” have had legal setbacks. asserted
efforts → target → setbacks
Chief United States District Judge Reed O’Connor of the Northern District of Texas, a George W. Bush appointee, issued a ruling on Aug.17 in favor of Defense Distributed, accepting arguments that the “frame or receiver rule” enacted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) was unconstitutional on both Fifth Amendment and Second Amendment grounds. asserted
rule → issue → grounds
A three-judge panel from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on Aug. 21 that a lawsuit brought by Democratic California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Giffords Law Center against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) demanding tighter regulations on so-called “ghost guns” should be dismissed for lack of standing. asserted
lawsuit → rule → standing
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support