Photo via Toronto Star

The sooner the Tories can admit the Pierre Poilievre experiment has failed, the better for us all

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Ling, J. (2026, November 14). The sooner the Tories can admit the Pierre Poilievre experiment has failed, the better for us all. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/star-columnists/the-sooner-the-tories-can-admit-the-poilievre-experiment-has-failed-the-better-for-us-all/article_e667bf5d-aef5-4b3b-93c5-6979ff61dce4.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-11-14 · by Justin Ling

Quick Summary

This opinion piece argues that the Conservative Party of Canada should abandon Pierre Poilievre’s leadership in favor of a more unifying style of conservatism. The author criticizes Poilievre’s use of "wedge politics" and "conspiracism" regarding global elites, contrasting his approach with the "ideals and foundations" of former leader Robert Stanfield. To support the claim that Poilievre's leadership is failing, the author cites the loss of four Conservative MPs who crossed the floor since late last year and a growing grassroots movement against him in the Brantford–Brand South riding.
Written by AI on 2026-11-14, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 14, 2026, political commentator Justin Ling argues in The Star that the Tories should admit the failure of Pierre Poilievre's leadership and replace him. Ling references Hugh Segal's critique of discarding leaders too quickly, noting that Canada lost something when Robert Stanfield left politics despite never winning an election. Ling draws parallels between Stanfield and Poilievre but asserts that Stanfield's departure was a loss, while Poilievre's continued presence is detrimental. Despite the Conservatives' recent electoral loss and Poilievre's declining popularity, the party seems resigned to his leadership, which Ling criticizes as divisive "wedge politics." Ling suggests the Tories should consider alternatives to Poilievre to improve their chances in future elections.

Written for “Pierre Poilievre Experiment Failed” on 2026-11-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Story

Pierre Poilievre Experiment Failed
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
68
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
1%
1 of 68 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 14442 article(s) · 29 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 29 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Justin Ling
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Mark Carney ate Poilievre’s lunch in 2025 by identifying those same problems and proffering robust ideas as to how they might be solved.
If it had been Trump’s name, he wrote on Truth Social, “we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE!”
They will give us, at long last, a clearer picture of how Prime Minister Mark Carney hopes to reshape a world thrown on its side by U.S. President Donald Trump.
In recent weeks, U.S. President Donald Trump has suggested unilaterally ending the Iran war absent a nuclear deal or the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz; threatened to bomb Oman, which had been mediating talks; vowed “economic D-Day” on Iran’s trading partners; declared he would win the war outright; proposed renaming it the Trump Strait; said the war would end after November’s midterm elections; mused at the United Nations on whether to annihilate Iran or make a deal; promised not to bomb Iran before the midterms; said he might bomb Iran before the midterms; rejected a ceasefire proposal; bragged that he didn’t even want a deal, in spite of Iran’s pleading; said anyone leaking or publishing details of his Iran plans should be shot; teased both short, intensive strikes and a large-scale operation against critical infrastructure.
These losers would still be on the political margins were they not being validated by one person: Premier Danielle Smith.
“The postwar world is long gone, but the underlying logic that justified multilateral co-operation is more evident than ever,” Carney wrote last month in the Financial Times, along with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Kenyan President William Ruto and European Council President António Costa.
On Monday, Quebecers will go to the polls to elect a new provincial government.
“Even when Trump moves on, another Trump will eventually come along.
Also by Justin Ling
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Justin Ling →

Topics

Canada Canadians Conservative Conservatives Tories

Subjects

Poilievre PERSON · 12× Canada GPE · 4× Conservative NORP · 3× Conservatives NORP · 3× Canadians NORP · 2× Mark Carney PERSON · 2× Segal PERSON · 2× Stanfield PERSON · 2× Hugh Segal PERSON · 1× Robert Stanfield PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Nobody better represented this tragedy for Segal than Robert Stanfield — “the best prime minister we never had” — who ran thrice against Pierre Elliott Trudeau and came up short each time. “His conservatism was one of ideals and foundations,” Segal wrote, “not ideology and the politics of wedging Canadians apart by their differences.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-14
Mark Carney ate Poilievre’s lunch in 2025 by identifying those same problems and proffering robust ideas as to how they might be solved.

Claims (68 extracted, 1 hedged)

One of the great failures of Canada’s parliamentary democracy, wrote Hugh Segal, “is the speed with which we discard leaders.” asserted
we → write → leaders
Losing leaders who lose elections, the respected scholar/staffer/senator wrote, means forgoing their “experience, judgement, constituency, and more textured understanding of the province, country, and body-politic.” asserted
senator → lose → province
Nobody better represented this tragedy for Segal than Robert Stanfield — “the best prime minister we never had” — who ran thrice against Pierre Elliott Trudeau and came up short each time. “His conservatism was one of ideals and foundations,” Segal wrote, “not ideology and the politics of wedging Canadians apart by their differences. asserted
Segal → represent → differences
The biggest difference is that Canada lost something by Stanfield’s departure. asserted
Canada → lose → departure
Today, we are missing out because Poilievre won’t go away. asserted
Poilievre → miss → ?
Still smarting from last year’s loss and more unpopular than ever, the Conservatives seem resigned to another three years of Poilievre’s brand of wedge politics. asserted
Conservatives → smart → politics
They should ditch the fatalism, I say. asserted
I → ditch → fatalism
Better is, in fact, possible — and the Tories should consult their wastebin of discarded leaders for inspiration. asserted
Tories → consult → inspiration
I’ve long had a bone to pick with the Poilievre style of paranoia politics. asserted
I → have → politics
He piloted a nasty kind of conspiracism with spooky warnings about “global financial elites” and the World Economic Forum; he endorsed a particularly virulent sort of anti-government anger in the Freedom Convoy; and he contributed to social fragmentation by railing against journalists and favouring weirdo social media influencers. asserted
he → pilot → influencers
All this is particularly frustrating because Poilievre has consistently offered stark assessments of the causes of Canada’s real problems. asserted
Poilievre → offer → problems
He yelped about reckless spending, anemic housing construction, mismanagement in the immigration system, and feel-good policies that accomplish little. asserted
that → yelp → little
It’s not fair, I suppose, that he was never rewarded for correctly diagnosing the root of Canada’s malaise. asserted
he → ’ → malaise
Mark Carney ate Poilievre’s lunch in 2025 by identifying those same problems and proffering robust ideas as to how they might be solved. uncertain
they → eat → ideas
He did this while offering a unifying message, not one cloaked in bitter recriminations about a nefarious deep state. asserted
He → do → state
Things, we know, got worse. asserted
we → know → ?
Four Conservatives have crossed the floor since late last year, a fifth was appointed to the Senate and three others are on their way out. asserted
others → cross → way
Few of them have much good to say about Poilievre’s leadership. asserted
Few → have → leadership
In Brantford–Brand South, Poilievre refused to hold a nomination contest and hand-picked a candidate instead. asserted
Poilievre → refuse → candidate
Now, Poilievre’s choice is running against an independent candidate who’s been endorsed by two former Conservative MPs from the riding. asserted
who → run → riding
That candidate, Dave Carrol, is running on a platform that amounts to an implicit rejection of Poilievre: Carrol has cast himself as a grassroots conservative who puts community before party, calling himself “Captain Kindness.” asserted
who → run → himself
This summer, I surveyed some Conservative strategists and staffers and tried to diagnose the rot in the state of Toryland. asserted
I → survey → Toryland
There was a path ahead for Poilievre, I argued, but it would require him to show a bit of humility about his lot. asserted
it → be → lot
He would need to accept that he would be relegated to the opposition benches for the next three years and start figuring out how to widen his appeal rather than to take the government out at the knees. asserted
he → need → knees
He’s done the opposite, and to little effect. asserted
He → do → effect
Today’s Conservatives are an amorphous blob of a party, existing only in rejection of everything the Carney government is doing. asserted
government → exist → everything
“After a year and a half of Mark Carney, everything’s worse,” Poilievre declared earlier this month. asserted
Poilievre → ’ → Carney
Polls show that Canadians disagree. asserted
Canadians → show → ?
When Poilievre rose to debate the government’s budget, he spoke as if he were robbing a stagecoach: “First, our demands.” asserted
he → rise → stagecoach
The government is spending too much, he insists, but also cutting too deeply. asserted
he → spend → much
That’s why it needs to axe fuel taxes and waive the GST on million-dollar home sales. asserted
it → ’ → sales
Poilievre has both backed Ottawa for walking away from trade talks with the United States and castigated it for not reaching a deal. asserted
Poilievre → back → deal
He has also, for some reason, made repeated trips to Detroit to pitch his plan for a “Tariff-Free Auto Pact” that is indistinguishable from what Canada has been proposing for years. asserted
Canada → make → years
Poilievre has reserved particular vitriol for Canada’s new immigration targets. asserted
Poilievre → reserve → targets
The government’s plan will add 380,000 new permanent residents and bring in 370,000 temporary residents per year, although Ottawa is also racing to un-bungle current backlogs by giving permanent residency to hundreds of thousands of people already in Canada this year. asserted
Ottawa → add → Canada
All told, our population is set to increase by 0.6 per cent at year’s end. asserted
population → tell → end
Poilievre immediately began ranting about the Liberals’ “bonkers” plan for “mass migration,” drawn up at the behest of a shadowy cabal of “corporate powerbrokers.” asserted
Poilievre → begin → powerbrokers
It’s tough out there for an opposition party — just ask the NDP. asserted
It → ’ → NDP
His knee-jerk policymaking is more populist than conservative, and Poilievre spends more time selling a vision of a dystopian Canadian hellscape than he does using his position in Parliament to propose actual solutions. asserted
he → spend → solutions
There are many ways to be an effective opposition leader that do not involve being a cheerleader for the government. asserted
that → be → government
…and 28 more, not listed.
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support