Photo via Toronto Sun

GOLDSTEIN: UN’s climate treaty a farce – why are we still part of it?

Read the original at Toronto Sun ↗
Cite

Goldstein, L. (2026, November 14). GOLDSTEIN: UN’s climate treaty a farce – why are we still part of it? Toronto Sun. https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/united-nations-climate-treaty-farce-why-canada-still-part-of-it

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Toronto Sun · collected 2026-11-14 · by Lorrie Goldstein

Quick Summary

No summary of this article yet; the story summary below covers the event.

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 14, 2026, Lorrie Goldstein, a columnist for the Toronto Sun, argues that Canada should withdraw from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris climate treaty. Goldstein contends that Canadian energy policies should be determined independently of the UN's climate bureaucracy. The 31st Conference of the Parties (COP 31) is currently taking place in Antalya, Turkiye, from November 9 to 20, 2026. Goldstein criticizes the conference for being hypocritical, noting that while global elites urge others to reduce emissions, global emissions reached a record high in 2025.

Written for “Un Climate Treaty Criticism” on 2026-11-15, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
South China Morning Post
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 62/100
“The articles refer to the same conference (UN climate talks), but Article A describes the beginning of the event and the concerns around it, while Article B discusses a different perspective on whether Canada should withdraw from the climate treaty during the same conference.”
The Hindu
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 0 of 20 claims Outlet record 78/100
“The articles refer to the same climate conference (COP31) but describe different aspects: one focuses on leaders urging climate action amidst global conflicts, while the other is an opinion piece criticizing participation in the climate treaty.”
Global News
Hedges 6 of 25 claims Outlet record 63/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the climate conference without describing the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Toronto Sun
Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of climate policy and do not describe the same specific event or incident.”
Semafor
Hedges 3 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on the UN climate treaty and COP summits but do not describe the same specific incident or meeting.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 2 of 21 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the climate conference: one focuses on the UN Secretary-General's speech and call for action, while the other discusses a Canadian perspective on withdrawing from the climate treaty.”
ABC News (AU)
Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 37 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different countries' approaches to the UN climate conference, and do not focus on the same specific incident or outcome.”
The Hindu
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 78/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the UN climate summit; one focuses on Canada potentially withdrawing from the treaty, while the other discusses the global reaction to missing the 1.5°C target at the summit.”

Story

Un Climate Treaty Criticism
Environment · 1 article(s) covering the same event.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
3 of 27 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
96/100
Toronto Sun's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Environment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Sun · 380 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Lorrie Goldstein
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
The ideal time for Canada to declare its independence – even though it won’t happen – would be at the annual UN global gabfest on climate change currently being held in Antalya, Turkiye from Nov. 9 to 20.
Prime Minister Mark Carney says he will privately raise Canada’s concerns about China’s interference in our democracy during his next meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, but Canadians have every right to be skeptical about what he will say.
Also by Lorrie Goldstein
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

COP 31 Canada Canadian Paris climate treaty the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Subjects

Canada GPE · 12× Canadian NORP · 6× Trudeau PERSON · 6× GOLDSTEIN PERSON · 4× Carney PERSON · 3× Antalya GPE · 1× Conference of the Parties ORG · 1× Mark Carney PERSON · 1× Turkiye ORG · 1× U.S. GPE · 1×

Narrative

The latest farce is the hypocrisy of Trudeau-era environment ministers Catherine McKenna and Steven Guilbault posting on social media while attending COP 31 that Carney’s environment minister, Julie Dabrusin, misled the public by telling The Canadian Press before leaving for the UN conference that Canada remains “absolutely committed” to achieving net zero emissions by 2050.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-14
The ideal time for Canada to declare its independence – even though it won’t happen – would be at the annual UN global gabfest on climate change currently being held in Antalya, Turkiye from Nov. 9 to 20.
2026-11-14 · Toronto Sun
GOLDSTEIN: UN’s climate treaty a farce – why are we still part of it? · assertive framing

Claims (27 extracted, 3 hedged)

In the name of Canadian sovereignty, it’s time for Prime Minister Mark Carney to withdraw Canada from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the UN’s Paris climate treaty. asserted
Carney → ’ → Change
Canadian energy policies should not be influenced, determined or implemented at the behest of the UN’s byzantine climate bureaucracy. asserted
policies → influence → bureaucracy
To borrow a phrase from the federal budget, let us be “masters of our destiny” on energy. asserted
us → borrow → energy
The ideal time for Canada to declare its independence – even though it won’t happen – would be at the annual UN global gabfest on climate change currently being held in Antalya, Turkiye from Nov. 9 to 20. asserted
it → declare → 20
This is the 31st annual meeting of the UN’s Conference of the Parties – known as COP 31 – where global elites fly in on private jets and urge everyone else to lower their industrial greenhouse gas emissions, and thus their standard of living, while global emissions keep rising and in 2025, were at their highest level ever. asserted
emissions → know → level
GOLDSTEIN: Trudeau’s failed climate policies left us captives to the U.S. oil market - asserted
policies → fail → market
Claims Canada's crime rate is down aren’t reporting the real story - uncertain
rate → report → story
Canada still reeling from lost decade of economic opportunity under Trudeau Canada will not meet 2030 and 2035 targets asserted
Canada → reel → targets
Carney has acknowledged Canada will not meet the unrealistic 2030 and 2035 targets the previous Justin Trudeau government agreed to under the 2015 UN Paris climate treaty to reduce our emissions to at least 40% below 2005 levels by 2030 and at least 45% by 2035. asserted
government → acknowledge → 2035
There is no logical reason for our government to maintain a bureaucracy devoted to implementing a treaty whose emission targets we are ignoring. asserted
we → be → targets
None of this is surprising since no Canadian government, Liberal or Conservative, has ever met a single one of the nine emission targets they have set since 1988. asserted
they → meet → 1988
Under Carney, Canada, in theory, remains committed to achieving the Paris treaty goal of net-zero emissions by 2050. asserted
Canada → remain → 2050
But given that it took 20 years to reduce our emissions to 9.5% below 2005 levels in 2025, according to a report last month by the federally-funded Canadian Climate Institute, the idea we’ll achieve net zero 24 years from now, is absurd. uncertain
we → give → zero
The CCI says Canada’s emissions increased by 1% last year to 691 million tonnes compared to 685 million tonnes in 2024, that Canada won’t achieve its 2030 target until 2050 and in 2050 will be 460 million tonnes above net zero. asserted
Canada → say → zero
The latest farce is the hypocrisy of Trudeau-era environment ministers Catherine McKenna and Steven Guilbault posting on social media while attending COP 31 that Carney’s environment minister, Julie Dabrusin, misled the public by telling The Canadian Press before leaving for the UN conference that Canada remains “absolutely committed” to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. asserted
Canada → post → 2050
Of course Dabrusin is misleading the public, but that’s no different from how McKenna and Guilbault misled the public when they claimed the Trudeau government was on track to meet its emission targets. asserted
government → mislead → targets
Costing Canadian taxpayers a fortune The failed attempt to reach those targets under the UN Paris treaty has cost Canadian taxpayers a fortune. asserted
attempt → cost → fortune
There are no financial, legal, or punitive penalties under the Paris treaty for a country that fails to reach its emission targets. asserted
that → be → targets
But there are costs that go far beyond the $14.3 billion Canada has sent to developing countries, ostensibly to help lower their emissions, since the Trudeau government came to power in 2015. asserted
government → be → 2015
Overall, the federal government under Trudeau committed more than $200 billion of taxpayers’ money to 149 programs administered by 13 government agencies, in a failed attempt to meet the Paris treaty targets. asserted
government → commit → targets
Add in $303 billion in estimated provincial and territorial spending on climate change, administered through 364 government programs and the total comes to $503 billion, or $12,000 for every Canadian, which doesn’t include municipal government spending on climate change. asserted
which → add → change
Carney abandoned Trudeau government’s unrealistic targets Carney abandoned Canada’s 2030 and 2035 unrealistic targets set by the Trudeau government because his goal of making Canada an energy superpower will require emissions to go up. asserted
emissions → abandon → government
That alone refutes the nonsense we’ve been told by Liberal governments since 2015 that efforts to reach the Paris treaty targets would have no negative impact on the Canadian economy. asserted
efforts → refute → economy
Carney’s decision to cancel the consumer carbon tax, increase Canada’s oil and natural gas exports, remove the cap on emissions in the energy sector, fast-track major infrastructure projects, including the Pacific Link pipeline from Alberta to B.C., and scrapping electrical vehicle mandates will all increase Canada’s emissions. asserted
decision → cancel → emissions
Withdrawing from the Paris treaty would not mean Canada could not pursue the Carney government’s agenda of lowering emissions over time, nor would it be unprecedented. uncertain
it → withdraw → time
The Stephen Harper Conservative government withdrew from the UN’s Kyoto accord – the predecessor of the Paris treaty – in 2011. asserted
government → withdraw → 2011
It simply means Canada would set its own energy policies, independent of the latest climate nonsense coming out of the UN. asserted
Canada → mean → UN
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support