Photo via Washington Examiner

China won’t pause AI development, so the US would be insane to

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Rogan, T. (2026, September 17). China won’t pause AI development, so the US would be insane to. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beltway-confidential/4729790/china-wont-pause-ai-development-us-would-be-insane-to/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-17 · by Tom Rogan

Quick Summary

Dominic Pino argues against pausing artificial intelligence development due to safety concerns, stating that such a move would be dangerous given China's rapid advancements in AI technology. He asserts that halting AI progress could allow China to dominate global technological leadership, potentially undermining American economic and military security. Pino warns of the potential for Chinese use of AI to engage in espionage, subjugate neighboring regions, and launch cyberattacks against the U.S., emphasizing the need for the United States to maintain its technological edge over China.
Written by AI on 2026-09-20, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Tom Rogan writes that calling for a pause in artificial intelligence development is a cultural-political trend without clear specifics. He argues that while safety concerns about AI are significant, especially regarding generative AI systems potentially acting against constitutional principles, halting development would be dangerous. The key reason is the ongoing technological race between the U.S. and China for dominance in next-generation technologies like AI. If China wins this race, it could use its AI superiority to dominate the Pacific region, subjugate neighboring countries militarily, and engage in extensive espionage against American businesses and individuals. Rogan asserts that the United States must maintain its current lead in AI to avoid a historical defeat.

Written for “China US AI Tensions” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 China US AI Tensions
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 65/100
“Article A discusses political commentary on AI development, while Article B reports a poll's findings about public opinion on AI. These are different types of content covering related topics but not the same specific event.”
NPR
Hedges 6 of 26 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different reactions and perspectives on AI development between China and the U.S., rather than the same specific incident or statement.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 27 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4136 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Tom Rogan
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Contrary to Tucker Carlson’s claims, it is extraordinarily unlikely that President Donald Trump will order a nuclear strike on Iran.
🔮 Absent major spending cuts, the U.K. will suffer a systemic crisis like that afflicting France.
🔮 The violent chaos rippling through France will become the Fifth Republic’s new norm.
🔮 We would not see Irkutsk residents going about their lives normally were authorities concerned about a mass outbreak of either pneumonic plague or some weaponized version of the plague.
🔮 Japanese media report that NMESIS will arrive on Yonaguni for the Oct. 19-29 U.S.-Japan “Keen Sword” military exercise.
2026-10-06 · assertive framing · The US makes a Taiwan NMESIS missile mess for China
🔮 And ignoring the grave defeat such action would impose upon his nation, Putin resurrected his nuclear threats.
🔮 Still, some observers have theorized that the men may have simply been fuel thieves who only appeared to be engaged in more nefarious activity.
🔮 The official would have known this, just as he knew his demands would have restricted U.S. media access.
2026-09-25 · assertive framing · Why Chinese delegations are so rude
🔮 Could these have been birds, and the drone operator simply have been confused?
2026-09-24 · assertive framing · Do new Pentagon sphere UFO videos show alien drones?
🔮 You’d expect EU leaders to want to do all they could to learn from the American experience.
Also by Tom Rogan
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Tom Rogan →

Topics

America American CCP China U.S.

Subjects

American NORP · 6× China GPE · 6× U.S. GPE · 5× America GPE · 4× CCP ORG · 4× Chinese NORP · 2× the United States GPE · 2× Americans NORP · 1× Dominic Pino PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1×

Narrative

China would use its AI dominance to subjugate the Pacific region and its neighbors militarily, and to engage in truly unconstrained espionage against American businesses and individuals.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-20
🔮 Superseding “kill switches” and other safeguards will have to be introduced into AI systems, especially generative AI, so that they cannot act against the Constitution or the people.
2026-09-20 · Washington Examiner
China won’t pause AI development, so the US would be insane to · assertive framing

Claims (27 extracted, 0 hedged)

As columnist Dominic Pino observes, politicians can’t actually tell us what this “pause” should entail. asserted
pause → observe → what
That’s a tell that these pausers are performing for public opinion. asserted
pausers → ’ → opinion
On this issue at least, President Donald Trump sees the bigger picture. asserted
Trump → see → picture
He knows that America currently holds the global initiative on AI. asserted
America → know → AI
He knows that the United States must retain that initiative or suffer its gravest defeat in history. asserted
States → know → history
Yes, the looming power of AI systems means that safety concerns are significant. asserted
concerns → loom → systems
Superseding “kill switches” and other safeguards will have to be introduced into AI systems, especially generative AI, so that they cannot act against the Constitution or the people. asserted
they → supersede → Constitution
That said, it would be extraordinarily dangerous to pause AI development. asserted
it → say → development
One word explains why. asserted
word → explain → ?
China is in a century-defining race with the U.S. to lead the world in next-generation technologies such as AI and quantum. asserted
China → define → AI
If China wins this race, the negative effects for Americans will extend far beyond the economic realm. asserted
effects → win → realm
China would use its AI dominance to subjugate the Pacific region and its neighbors militarily, and to engage in truly unconstrained espionage against American businesses and individuals. asserted
China → use → businesses
Does anyone seriously expect that a nation which wages a genocide against its own people would be a beneficent global master of the AI industry? asserted
which → expect → industry
In turn, the only way to restrain this malevolent ambition is for the U.S. to overmatch Chinese technology with its own. asserted
U.S. → restrain → own
Indeed, China is already doing everything it can to steal American AI and other proprietary research. asserted
it → do → AI
It is doing so to bolster its economic, military, and scientific position against the United States. asserted
It → do → States
President Xi Jinping’s urgency here reflects the Chinese Communist Party’s understanding of what’s at stake in this battle. asserted
what → reflect → battle
And we can theorize what a CCP victory would entail. asserted
victory → theorize → what
It would mean the People’s Liberation Army being able to blind U.S. military communications and penetrate American defenses with hyperintelligent missile and drone swarm attacks. asserted
Army → mean → attacks
It would mean a relentless campaign to find and exploit as-yet-unknown flaws in the software of America’s most valuable companies and most important government agencies. asserted
It → mean → companies
Befitting both the CCP’s ideology and historic Chinese political-military doctrine, it would mean deception campaigns to influence American public opinion in China’s favor. asserted
it → befit → favor
It would mean American industry existing under the CCP’s perpetual thumb, imprisoning the risk-taking entrepreneurship and cutting-edge science that have long defined America. asserted
that → mean → America
China would then establish global marketplace dominance. asserted
China → establish → dominance
It would mean Beijing being able to demand political fealty from America and the rest of the world and launch devastating cyberattacks absent that fealty. asserted
Beijing → mean → fealty
It should be obvious, then, that the U.S. must establish AI mastery before entertaining any unilateral “pause” in AI research. asserted
U.S. → establish → research
To do otherwise is to trust in the morality of the CCP, which is tantamount to bathing in a saltwater crocodile-infested river. asserted
which → trust → river
Either the U.S. keeps racing toward AI dominance, or American schools start teaching about the Politburo and Standing Committee. asserted
schools → keep → Politburo
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support