Photo via Daily Mail

Hospital boss doctored a review into baby deaths to make it look like two infants murdered by Lucy Letby died of natural causes, inquiry found

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Hull, L. (2026, September 17). Hospital boss doctored a review into baby deaths to make it look like two infants murdered by Lucy Letby died of natural causes, inquiry found. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16139759/Hospital-boss-doctored-review-baby-deaths-make-look-like-two-infants-murdered-Lucy-Letby-died-natural-causes-inquiry-found.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-17 · by Liz Hull

Quick Summary

A public inquiry found that Ian Harvey, former medical director at the Countess of Chester Hospital, altered a review to make it appear that two infants murdered by Lucy Letby had died of natural causes. This deception was used to justify allowing Letby back onto the ward despite concerns about her conduct. The inquiry criticized Harvey and other hospital leaders for failing to protect babies from harm, suggesting that if they had acted sooner, three infants could have been saved. Harvey earned £175,000 annually and admitted changing Dr Jane Hawdon’s report without her knowledge, which initially flagged the deaths of several infants as unexpected and requiring further investigation.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Ian Harvey, a 68-year-old hospital boss at the Countess of Chester Hospital, altered a review on baby deaths to make it appear that two infants murdered by Lucy Letby had died from natural causes. This manipulation misled the hospital board into allowing Letby, a former neo-natal nurse, back onto the ward despite concerns. According to a 822-page report released by Lady Justice Thirlwall, who oversaw an £18.5 million inquiry, Harvey changed the document without informing its author, Dr Jane Hawdon. The judge criticized Harvey and other hospital leaders for their "dysfunctional" behavior in failing to protect babies from harm. She noted that three infants could have been saved if managers had acted more quickly by suspending Letby and involving law enforcement earlier.

Written for “Letby Coverup Revealed” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Letby Coverup Revealed
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
Hedges 2 of 25 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Lucy Letby case, with Article A focusing on a senior doctor's comments about an inquiry report and Article B detailing how a hospital boss altered a review to mislead the board.”
BBC News
Hedges 4 of 77 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles describe different parts of the ongoing case involving Lucy Letby; Article A discusses public debate and skepticism surrounding her convictions, while Article B reports on a hospital boss altering a review to mislead about baby deaths.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different aspects of a broader inquiry: one about Letby's barrister damaging her chances and expert opinions, while the other reports on a hospital boss altering a review to mislead the board.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 3 of 37 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the overall public inquiry and outcomes related to Lucy Letby's case, while Article B focuses on a specific incident where a hospital boss altered a review document to mislead about baby deaths. These are different aspects of the broader case.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 6 of 26 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles describe different aspects of the inquiry; Article A discusses systemic failures to protect babies, while Article B focuses on a hospital boss altering a review to cover up deaths.”
The Guardian
Hedges 11 of 63 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses general findings of a public inquiry about Lucy Letby's actions and potential preventable deaths, while Article B focuses on a specific incident where a hospital boss altered a review to mislead the board regarding two infants' deaths.”
BBC News
Hedges 6 of 50 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses plans for baby ward cameras after an inquiry into Lucy Letby's crimes, while Article B reports on a hospital boss altering a review to misrepresent deaths caused by Letby as natural causes.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 5 of 35 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses hospital bosses stalling a police probe and targeting whistleblowers, while Article B focuses on a specific instance where a hospital boss doctored a review to mislead the board. These describe different aspects of the broader inquiry but are not the same specific incident.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A focuses on a judge's scathing report about management failures and lack of protection for babies at the hospital where Lucy Letby was convicted, while Article B discusses how a hospital boss altered a review to mislead the board regarding two infants' deaths. These are separate aspects of the ongoing inquiry into baby deaths.”
The Guardian
Hedges 6 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss the inquiry into Lucy Letby's actions at Countess of Chester Hospital, they describe different aspects and findings of the ongoing investigation.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 34 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
68/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 8448 article(s) · 20 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 20 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Liz Hull
12 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Several visitors to the park have described the man behaving 'strangely' before he entered the compound - and suggested he may have had learning difficulties or mental health problems. Anthony Hunt, 22, a university graduate, and Scarlet Hogan, 21, a pharmacy worker, first encountered the man as they parked up at Yorkshire Wildlife Park.
🔮 Up to three children murdered by the 36-year-old former neonatal nurse should not and would not have died had hospital managers acted sooner to remove her from the ward, she said.
🔮 They believe the infant's body may have been swept with the tide into the Menai Strait, the body of water which divides the Island of Anglesey and mainland North Wales, from elsewhere in Britain or even as far away as Ireland.
🔮 The King's equerry is believed to have contacted an individual who had written a letter asking how the monarch could get in touch with Sir Ranulph and was given a phone number for his wife and legal guardian, Louise Millington-Cotes. But she was allegedly angry the Palace had been given her details and threatened the intermediary with a solicitor and the police, The Telegraph reported.
🔮 The 60-year-old pleaded guilty to sending 1,200 lethal packages to more than 40 countries, including 330 to Britain, in May.
🔮 The Appeal Court judge, who oversaw the £18.5million inquiry, said that three infants could have been saved had managers acted sooner to suspend Letby and bring in police sooner.
🔮 Lady Justice Thirlwall, the judge who oversaw the hearings, concluded that three babies murdered by the neonatal nurse might have been saved, and seven others protected from attack, had detectives been called in sooner.
🔮 Yet she was particularly chummy with top bosses, something which may have clouded their judgment. MISSED OPPORTUNITIES The judge pulled no punches in pointing the finger of blame at senior managers including Alison Kelly, Ian Harvey and Tony Chambers, who 'dismissed the idea that Letby was deliberately harming babies', as late as June 2016.
🔮 However, she accepted she should have been 'more attentive' and 'it (the spike) could have been looked at in a more timely way'.
🔮 'Looking for clinical or other explanations for deaths and collapses was not wrong, but once there was suspicion that Letby may be causing harm deliberately, safeguarding steps should have been taken.
Also by Liz Hull
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 12 articles by Liz Hull →

Topics

Appeal Court Daily Mail Inquiry the Countess of Chester Hospital the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

Subjects

Harvey PERSON · 8× Hawdon PERSON · 8× Letby PERSON · 5× Baby D’s PERSON · 2× Ian Harvey PERSON · 2× Inquiry ORG · 2× Jane Hawdon PERSON · 2× Thirlwall PERSON · 2× Daily Mail ORG · 1× Lucy Letby PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The report said: ‘When giving evidence, Dr Hawdon informed the Inquiry she was not consulted by Mr Harvey before he did this, and that she was not aware of any of Mr Harvey’s amendments until she was informed by the Inquiry.’ It was only later, when Dr Hawdon was informed of the pathologist’s evidence to the inquiry that Baby D had died ‘with’ pneumonia and not ‘of’ the infection that she decided it was ‘no longer a plausible contribution to (her) death,’ the report said.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 The Appeal Court judge, who oversaw the £18.5million inquiry, said that three infants could have been saved had managers acted sooner to suspend Letby and bring in police sooner.

Claims (34 extracted, 1 hedged)

- See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source A hospital boss doctored a review into baby deaths to make it look like two infants murdered by Lucy Letby died of natural causes, a public inquiry found. asserted
inquiry → see → causes
Ian Harvey, 68, changed the document without the ‘shocked’ author’s knowledge and used it to mislead the board at the Countess of Chester Hospital into allowing the former neo-natal nurse back onto the ward. asserted
Harvey → change → ward
In the end Letby, 36, never returned to work after doctors pressurised senior executives into calling the police. asserted
doctors → return → police
In her 822-page report, published on Tuesday, Lady Justice Thirlwall was scathing of the conduct of medical director Mr Harvey and other ‘dysfunctional’ leaders at the hospital, who she said ‘completely failed’ to protect babies from harm. asserted
she → publish → harm
The Appeal Court judge, who oversaw the £18.5million inquiry, said that three infants could have been saved had managers acted sooner to suspend Letby and bring in police sooner. uncertain
managers → oversee → police
Instead they ordered pointless reviews – one by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and another by neonatologist Dr Jane Hawdon – which never explained why babies were dying. asserted
babies → order → Hawdon
Dr Hawdon told the inquiry she was commissioned by Mr Harvey, a retired orthopaedic surgeon who was paid £175,000-a-year, to review the medical notes of 17 babies – 13 deaths and four ‘near misses’ – that collapsed at the hospital between June 2015 and June 2016. asserted
that → tell → June
But, Lady Justice Thirlwall said, he ‘failed to mention any concerns about deliberate harm to babies by a staff member, nor that the deaths were unexpected or unexplained’. asserted
deaths → say → member
‘He should have done,’ the judge added. asserted
judge → do → ?
Letby murdered the babies in the hospital between 2015 to 2016 The Countess's former medical director Ian Harvey admitted altering the review without Dr Jane Hawdon's knowledge asserted
director → murder → knowledge
The babies were murdered at the Countess of Chester Hospital, in Cheshire asserted
babies → murder → Cheshire
Dr Hawdon, then a consultant neonatologist at Barts Health NHS Trust, in London, initially concluded the deaths of five of the infants, Babies A, D, I, O and P, were unexpected and unexplained and needed ‘a broader forensic review.’ But after being sent Baby D’s post-mortem by Mr Harvey, she emailed him back to say she agreed with the pathologist that her death had been due to pneumonia. asserted
death → conclude → pneumonia
As a consequence, Mr Harvey amended her report to say Baby D’s death was due to natural causes without her consent. asserted
death → amend → consent
The report said: ‘When giving evidence, Dr Hawdon informed the Inquiry she was not consulted by Mr Harvey before he did this, and that she was not aware of any of Mr Harvey’s amendments until she was informed by the Inquiry.’ It was only later, when Dr Hawdon was informed of the pathologist’s evidence to the inquiry that Baby D had died ‘with’ pneumonia and not ‘of’ the infection that she decided it was ‘no longer a plausible contribution to (her) death,’ the report said. asserted
report → say → death
Letby was convicted of murdering the full-term baby girl by injecting her with air on a night shift in June 2015. asserted
Letby → convict → June
Dr Hawdon also accepted under questioning that another baby – a twin boy known as Baby E – should also have been included on her unexplained deaths list. asserted
baby → accept → list
She said she was told he died of a gastric bleed but accepted the cause of the bleed was unknown. asserted
cause → say → bleed
Letby was convicted of murdering the twin by ramming a hard medical instrument into his throat and injecting him with air, in August 2015. asserted
Letby → convict → August
While giving her evidence to the inquiry, Dr Hawdon was shown a copy of her review which had the words ‘necrotising enterocolitis,' also known as NEC, next to Baby E’s name. asserted
which → give → name
She told the judge she did not make this addition to her report and NEC – a debilitating bowel condition that can be potentially fatal for premature newborns – ‘did not fit well with the pattern of health issues that preceded Baby E’s collapse.’ asserted
that → tell → collapse
The report said: ‘In Mr Harvey’s oral evidence, he accepted that he made amendments to Dr Hawdon’s report.’ asserted
he → say → report
Dr Hawdon also said she ‘assumed’ Mr Harvey would follow the NHS’s duty of candour and share the findings of her report with the babies’ parents, which should have been a ‘given.’ asserted
which → say → parents
But, the judge found, he did not do so. asserted
he → find → ?
Some excerpts were sent to some of the parents, but only six months after Dr Hawdon had completed her review. asserted
Hawdon → send → review
The excerpts were in medical language and described by one mother as ‘not meaningful at all.’ asserted
excerpts → describe → mother
Dr Hawdon said she was ‘shocked’ when she was shown what had been sent. asserted
what → say → ?
The mother of Baby C, a premature baby boy who was murdered by Lucy Letby in June 2015, told the inquiry: ‘There was no introduction to the report, who had written it, what date it was written on. asserted
it → murder → date
It wasn’t signed and dated by anybody. asserted
It → sign → anybody
‘We’d been told that these in-depth investigations had taken place and not revealed any cause for concern. asserted
investigations → tell → concern
Yet, we were sent a couple of pages of a report that didn’t look at all in-depth to me … … asserted
that → send → me
Or, if it was, then it was woefully inadequate to call that a thorough investigation. asserted
it → call → that
She said she got the impression ‘something significant’ was being hidden from them. asserted
something → say → them
Other parents had no clue any investigations were being carried out into their babies’ deaths, or that their children’s medical records had been shared without their knowledge. asserted
records → carry → knowledge
Letby is serving 15 whole life sentences for the murder of seven infants and the attempted murder of seven more - one of whom she attacked twice. asserted
she → serve → whom
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support