Photo via Washington Examiner

Anthropic allies are behind ‘independent’ groups ringing alarm bells about AI

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Crozier, H. (2026, September 17). Anthropic allies are behind ‘independent’ groups ringing alarm bells about AI. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/investigations/4729617/anthropic-allies-independent-groups-ai-warnings-tarbell-center-fellows/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-17 · by Hudson Crozier

Quick Summary

The Washington Examiner reports that two nonprofit groups, Tarbell Center and Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR), which warn about AI risks, are linked to Anthropic’s allies including Dustin Moskovitz, Jaan Tallinn, and Paul Christiano. These organizations have ties to Anthropic through funding or advisory roles and promote skeptical journalism and risk assessments related to AI technology. The article questions the independence of these groups given their connections to Anthropic, suggesting potential bias in how they frame discussions around AI regulation and safety.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Anthropic, a prominent technology firm in artificial intelligence (AI), has allies backing two nonprofit organizations: Tarbell Center and Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR). These groups have become key players in discussing potential risks associated with AI, advocating for skeptical journalism and risk evaluations. Tarbell Center is linked to Dustin Moskovitz, cofounder of Meta and a significant Democratic donor, as well as Jaan Tallinn, a Skype cofounder; METR connects Moskovitz, Tallinn, and Paul Christiano, an AI researcher involved in Anthropic's growth.

In recent developments, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei endorsed METR’s role as “third-party evaluators,” promoting them to assess Anthropic’s tools and other major AI companies. This move is aimed at addressing concerns within the industry regarding unchecked power dynamics among smaller groups influencing AI policies. The Tarbell Center also runs a fellowship program that integrates tech reporters into established news outlets to produce critical AI coverage, aiming to bring more transparency to the field.

Written for “AI Alignment Groups Funding” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Alignment Groups Funding
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 1 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes an interview where Anthropic's CEO calls for third-party evaluators in AI safety, while Article B discusses organizations backing Anthropic and its regulatory agenda, which is a different event.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 8 of 99 claims
“Article A discusses a specific event (Pro-Human Assembly) with mentions of speakers like Steve Bannon and Bernie Sanders, while Article B reports on the backing of AI-skeptic organizations by Anthropic allies without mentioning the same specific assembly or event.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different initiatives by Microsoft and independent groups tied to Anthropic regarding AI caution, not the same specific incident.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 25 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different organizations and initiatives related to AI safety but do not refer to the same specific incident or time.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 1 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses a biosecurity expert's opinion on Anthropic's report about blocking bad actors from using its AI models for harmful purposes, while Article B talks about organizations with ties to Anthropic that are issuing warnings about AI risks. These articles discuss different aspects of the broader topic of AI misuse and oversight.”
Reason
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns; one is a discussion about existential threats and regulation, while the other focuses on the backing of nonprofit groups issuing warnings about AI.”
Semafor
Hedges 1 of 32 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and public perception but describe distinct events or activities related to AI companies and nonprofit groups.”
ABC News (US)
Hedges 0 of 1 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different aspects of AI-related activities involving various figures but do not report on the same specific incident.”
BBC News
Hedges 13 of 54 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses Jacob Coxon's resignation and warnings about AI at a Silicon Valley conference, while Article B talks about organizations backed by Anthropic allies issuing warnings about AI risks.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 4 of 48 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Democratic response to AI concerns and do not describe the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
6 of 33 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3866 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Hudson Crozier
30 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The pair advertised their fake services to a sheriff’s deputy, tried to approach a Navy base in Georgia, and may have recruited an unnamed Pentagon employee, the Department of Justice claimed.
🔮 Leftists convicted in a 2023 vandalism attack said Thursday they will return to jail rather than testify in a federal grand jury investigation in New Hampshire.
🔮 A May 2025 French parliamentary investigation labeled the club a “student branch of the Muslim Brotherhood,” the decades-old Islamic fundamentalist movement that created Hamas and which maintains political connections worldwide, according to a summary by the American think tank Middle East Forum.
🔮 The now-deleted post invited viewers to join an Oct. 7 City Hall protest against Democratic New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani for supposedly failing the pro-Palestinian cause, the Washington Examiner previously reported.
🔮 Slota told officials that “he and Belcher would ‘cop watch’ meaning they would follow law enforcement, such as [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] and [Huntsville Police Department], around as a means of protecting the community,” an FBI counterterrorism agent wrote.
🔮 The speaker expressed hope that they could “put a complete stop to major aspects, if not the entire border wall happening here.”
🔮 But many in the place I grew up would recoil at a statement like that.
🔮 A witness later reported the suspect to authorities over alleged December 2025 posts on Threads saying Belcher would “gun down an [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] agent on sight” and showing a firearm.
🔮 The rapid growth of America’s Muslim population is renewing fears that Sharia could undermine American values, including in Texas, where Republicans are strategizing on how to restrict Islamic political influence.
🔮 “I am sensitive to any situation that would unduly expose our colleagues to such risks.”
Also by Hudson Crozier
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 30 articles by Hudson Crozier →

Topics

Anthropic METR Tarbell The Tarbell Center the Washington Examiner

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 12× METR ORG · 5× Tarbell ORG · 5× the Washington Examiner ORG · 5× Christiano PERSON · 3× Moskovitz PERSON · 3× Alignment Research Center ORG · 2× Long-Term Benefit Trust ORG · 2× Tallinn GPE · 2× The Tarbell Center ORG · 2×

Narrative

“We don’t think any small group should have authority over what happens with AI, and our goal is to get information from inside these companies out into the public domain – external investigators can help bring more information to light (as we saw in our report on the Hugging Face [hacking] attack).”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 He announced METR’s team would act as “third-party evaluators” assessing Anthropic’s tools and encouraging every major AI company to take this “key step.”
2026-09-17 · Washington Examiner
Anthropic allies are behind ‘independent’ groups ringing alarm bells about AI · assertive framing

Claims (33 extracted, 6 hedged)

A pair of organizations issuing warnings about the possible dangers of artificial intelligence are backed by allies of the technology firm Anthropic and its regulatory agenda. asserted
pair → issue → firm
The nonprofit groups Tarbell Center and Model Evaluation and Threat Research have emerged as key players in the public debate surrounding AI risks and potential policy, promoting AI-skeptical journalism and risk evaluations, respectively. asserted
Center → emerge → journalism
The Tarbell Center has ties to Meta cofounder and longtime pro-Democrat donor Dustin Moskovitz and Skype cofounder Jaan Tallinn, while METR is connected to Moskovitz, Tallinn, and AI researcher Paul Christiano, a Washington Examiner review of public statements found. asserted
review → have → statements
All three tech leaders played roles in Anthropic’s rise to success. asserted
leaders → play → success
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei raised eyebrows by promoting METR as an AI safety solution in an essay this month. asserted
Amodei → raise → essay
He announced METR’s team would act as “third-party evaluators” assessing Anthropic’s tools and encouraging every major AI company to take this “key step.” asserted
team → announce → step
The Tarbell Center, for its part, runs a fellowship program placing tech reporters at legacy news outlets to publish coverage of AI, the Washington Examiner previously reported. asserted
Examiner → run → AI
The Washington Examiner itself has discussed placing a reporter in its newsroom with Tarbell in the past, interviewing prospective candidates, although nothing ultimately came to fruition. asserted
nothing → discuss → fruition
“Tarbell exists to strengthen independent, rigorous journalism about AI,” a Tarbell spokesperson told the Washington Examiner. asserted
spokesperson → exist → Examiner
Tarbell does not determine what fellows cover, how they approach a story or what conclusions they reach and our funders have no editorial role in the journalism we support. asserted
we → determine → journalism
“The fellows supported by Tarbell produce a varied body of work,” the spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → support → work
“This includes reporting that reaches a wide range of findings and conclusions.” asserted
that → include → findings
The push comes as members of Congress fiercely debate how to ensure AI does not harm society, while Anthropic skeptics warn the company’s inner circle is vying for a monopoly over the public policy discussion to advocate its preferred restrictions on the technology. asserted
circle → come → technology
Moskovitz and Tallinn were both early investors in Anthropic shortly after its 2021 founding, according to multiple reports. uncertain
Moskovitz → accord → reports
Christiano was an initial trustee for Anthropic’s Long-Term Benefit Trust in 2023 and founded Alignment Research Center, which has directly assisted Anthropic’s work, according to past statements from the tech researcher and Anthropic. uncertain
which → found → researcher
Christiano later stepped down from Anthropic’s Long-Term Benefit Trust to join the Anthropic-backed AI Safety Institute, a regulatory advisory agency for the U.K. government. asserted
Christiano → step → government
Anthropic did not respond to the Washington Examiner’s requests for comment. asserted
Anthropic → respond → comment
“We do not accept donations by frontier AI companies or their employees, and our funders have no say in the projects we work on,” METR President Chris Painter told the Washington Examiner. asserted
Painter → accept → Examiner
He pointed to a prior statement in which he said his organization’s work does not promote “doomer” narratives about AI. asserted
work → point → AI
“We share the concern that there won’t be meaningful independent oversight of these companies,” Painter told the Washington Examiner. asserted
Painter → share → Examiner
“We don’t think any small group should have authority over what happens with AI, and our goal is to get information from inside these companies out into the public domain – external investigators can help bring more information to light (as we saw in our report on the Hugging Face [hacking] attack).” asserted
we → think → attack
METR’s website says nine AI developers have adopted its “Responsible Scaling Policies,” which help decide when continuing to develop certain systems would be “too dangerous” without protective measures. asserted
continuing → say → measures
The group warns that third-party entities such as itself are needed because “it seems very plausible that advanced AI systems could pursue goals that are at odds with what humans want.” uncertain
humans → warn → what
Moskovitz donated in 2022 to Christiano’s Alignment Research Center, which was a precursor to METR — although the donation was restricted from benefiting METR directly, the nonprofit group told the New York Post. asserted
group → donate → Post
Tallinn, meanwhile, has given more than $150 million to hundreds of projects that include METR, according to Time magazine. uncertain
that → give → magazine
AI’s media watchdog The Tarbell Center’s affiliations with Anthropic supporters similarly run deep. asserted
affiliations → run → supporters
The Tarbell Center’s largest donors include Coefficient Giving, a group led by Moskovitz, as well as Tallinn’s Survival and Flourishing Fund. asserted
donors → include → Moskovitz
The center also lists Anthropic cofounder and head of policy Jack Clark as a speaker in its fellowship program, promising “a variety of perspectives from experts in both journalism and AI.” asserted
center → list → journalism
Nevertheless, the nonprofit organization‘s website says it aims to hold “the companies and people building it to account.” asserted
it → say → account
Critics have described Tarbell-backed journalists’ narratives about possible AI harms as exaggerated. asserted
Critics → describe → harms
“As models grow more sophisticated, many experts fear they could aid terrorists in unleashing new pandemics, empower malicious actors to carry out devastating cyberattacks, or further enable authoritarian regimes to tighten their grip on society,” the center’s site reads. uncertain
site → grow → society
“More advanced systems could also upend the economy, potentially leading to mass unemployment or social unrest.” uncertain
systems → upend → unemployment
The group emphasizes that it does not take direct donations from companies such as Anthropic or individual employees working for them. asserted
it → emphasize → them
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support