Photo via Washington Examiner

New York Times reporting ‘errors’ all go in one antisemitic direction

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Faria, Z. (2026, September 17). New York Times reporting ‘errors’ all go in one antisemitic direction. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beltway-confidential/4732074/new-york-times-october-7-reporting-one-antisemitic-direction/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-17 · by Zachary Faria

Quick Summary

The New York Times is criticized for a series of reporting errors that consistently favor an anti-Israel perspective during coverage of Israel and Gaza conflicts. An example given includes a sentence implying Israelis question their status as victims after the October 7 attacks, which saw Palestinian terrorists kill over 1,200 civilians. The article argues these mistakes are part of a broader pattern where the Times has inaccurately reported on issues such as hospital bombings by Israel and unsupported claims about prisoner abuse, all while overlooking context that would support Israel's position.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Washington Examiner columnist Joe Concha criticized the New York Times for an "editing error" in its coverage of the Oct. 7 attack on Israel, where it mistakenly implied that Israeli victimhood was a matter of perspective rather than fact. On Fox News’s Hannity, Concha questioned why the New York Times would doubt Jewish victimization and called it antisemitic. The newspaper acknowledged and corrected the error after criticism from conservative outlets like the Washington Examiner. Another article by Zachary Faria in the same publication highlighted that such errors consistently paint an anti-Israeli narrative, with one instance stating Israelis still largely view themselves as victims of the Oct. 7 attack when Palestinian terrorists killed over 1,200 civilians, including women and children, and took hundreds hostage. The New York Times removed the sentence from its article to address these concerns.

Written for “NYT Antisemitic Bias” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 NYT Antisemitic Bias
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 8 of 84 claims
“The articles discuss different aspects of media coverage regarding Israel and Palestine without focusing on a single identical incident.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 5 of 54 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of New York Times reporting but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 5 of 25 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the October 7th incident without describing the same specific occurrence.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 28 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the conflict: Article A focuses on accusations of genocide, while Article B discusses perceived antisemitic bias in media coverage.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of media coverage regarding Israel and Gaza but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 12 claims Outlet record 70/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 6 of 72 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and time periods related to the Israel-Palestine conflict without focusing on the exact same incident.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 26 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of media coverage and reporting on Israel and Gaza, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
National Post
Hedges 4 of 25 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of media coverage related to Israel and Gaza, but do not describe the same specific incident.”
National Post
Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles critique The New York Times' coverage of Israel's conflict with Hamas, they discuss different aspects and do not describe the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
15
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
1 of 15 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3780 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Zachary Faria
23 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Next week’s midterm elections will give voters in a couple of Democrat-run states the opportunity to roll back transgender ideology and protect children from the injustice and medical malpractice Democrats are allowing to be inflicted upon them.
🔮 Further complicating matters is that Proposition 40 could pass and still be voided by Propositions 41 and 42 if either one passes with more support than Proposition 40.
🔮 Like, that sounds fun, I might get an opportunity.’
🔮 New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani has discovered that the hateful communist base he has cultivated does not care about the intricacies of governing, and he has no one to blame but himself.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · Mamdani discovers how hateful his supporters are
🔮 Is el Sayed simply so arrogant about his chances that he thinks this won’t matter, or did he and his team not anticipate that bringing up a home Rogers owned in Florida would backfire in such a way?
2026-10-09 · assertive framing · Increasingly insulated Democrats struggle in debates
🔮 This comes with the obvious caveats: Nearly three-fourths of the 14% of voters who are undecided would choose Becerra if push came to shove, and the poll is an outlier compared to the polling average, which has Becerra consistently leading by double digits.
🔮 The matchup, which was Eden Prairie’s homecoming game, was scheduled to resume on Monday, which would force both high schools to play twice in the same week, as they have games scheduled for Friday.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · Why does an American state have Somali gangs?
🔮 This case will then be used to argue that the death penalty should be abolished.
🔮 It does not matter that Democrats such as Newsom have run California for the past decade, that Trump has little control over anything California does, or that Trump will be out of office in two years.
🔮 That Burr would celebrate the murder of a supposedly greedy millionaire is ironic, given that Burr himself is a greedy millionaire.
2026-09-25 · assertive framing · What happened to Bill Burr?
Also by Zachary Faria
JB Pritzker lives in an alternate Illinois reality
2026-10-28 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 23 articles by Zachary Faria →

Topics

Gaza Israel Israelis Palestinian The New York Times

Subjects

The New York Times ORG · 7× Israel GPE · 6× Gaza GPE · 4× Israelis NORP · 4× Palestinian NORP · 4× Hamas ORG · 1× Isabel Kershner PERSON · 1× New Yorkers NORP · 1× Nicholas Kristof PERSON · 1× pro-Palestinian NORP · 1×

Narrative

It is an absurd, outrageous sentence to send to print, given that Israelis were the victims of Oct. 7, when Palestinian terrorists invaded the country, slaughtered 1,200 civilians (including women, children, and the elderly), and took hundreds of hostages.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 This sentence would be the equivalent of “New Yorkers still largely view themselves as the victims of 9/11.”
2026-09-17 · Washington Examiner
New York Times reporting ‘errors’ all go in one antisemitic direction · assertive framing

Claims (15 extracted, 1 hedged)

The New York Times can’t stop making “errors” in its coverage of Israel and Gaza, and all of those errors just so happen to go in the same antisemitic direction. asserted
all → stop → direction
In an ostensible news piece published earlier this week about a pro-Palestinian “documentary,” correspondent Isabel Kershner included the following line: “But Israelis still largely view themselves as the victims of Oct. 7.” asserted
Israelis → publish → Oct.
It is an absurd, outrageous sentence to send to print, given that Israelis were the victims of Oct. 7, when Palestinian terrorists invaded the country, slaughtered 1,200 civilians (including women, children, and the elderly), and took hundreds of hostages. asserted
terrorists → send → hostages
This sentence would be the equivalent of “New Yorkers still largely view themselves as the victims of 9/11.” asserted
Yorkers → view → 9/11
The New York Times went into damage control, issuing the following editor’s note: “Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article included a statement that was intended to convey Israelis’ perception of the government’s military response to the Oct. 7 terror attack in relation to the attacks, but inadvertently suggested that Israelis’ experience as terror victims was a matter of perception. uncertain
experience → go → perception
It has been removed from the article.” asserted
It → remove → article
The New York Times, which presents itself as a gold standard of journalistic and editorial integrity, wants you to believe this “error” just so happened to slip through the cracks. asserted
error → present → cracks
However, the New York Times has a litany of “errors” on this topic, and they all just so happen to cut against Israel. asserted
they → have → Israel
The outlet famously parroted Hamas propaganda when it “reported” that Israel bombed a hospital in Gaza and killed 500 civilians. asserted
Israel → parrot → civilians
In reality, a missile had hit a parking lot near a hospital, a few dozen people were killed, and the missile had been launched by Palestinian terrorists. asserted
missile → hit → terrorists
The New York Times also ran a story about child starvation in Gaza using a photo of an emaciated boy to incite another round of condemnations of Israel. asserted
Times → run → Israel
Unmentioned was that the boy had cerebral palsy, and that the outlet couldn’t actually find a single photo of a child in Gaza who was wasting away because of mass starvation. asserted
who → have → starvation
The New York Times also published the deranged conspiratorial rantings of Nicholas Kristof, who asserted, with no evidence and in defiance of basic biology, that Israel was using dogs to rape Palestinian prisoners. asserted
Israel → publish → prisoners
The New York Times has, since Oct. 7, propagandized on behalf of Palestinian terrorists and tried to dismiss or downplay the legitimacy of Israel’s military response. asserted
Times → propagandize → response
The outlet publishing constant anti-Israel disinformation and spreading dog rape conspiracy theories doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt in cases like this, especially when every “error” only happens to go in one antisemitic direction. asserted
error → publish → direction
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support