More than 60 percent of Americans believe it’s at least moderately likely that artificial intelligence will kill us all, according to a Politico survey released Wednesday.
uncertain
intelligence → believe → survey
It’s easy to see why.
asserted
It → ’ → ?
Arguments that AI companies are “gambling with our lives” have dominated the news this week.
asserted
companies → gamble → news
But despite our fear that AI might kill us en masse, another new poll shows that very few Americans know our government is already using AI to do just that abroad.
uncertain
government → kill → that
The US-Israel war on Iran is not only the least popular war the United States has ever waged, but also represents an unprecedented application of AI in warfare.
asserted
States → wag → warfare
New data from the Institute for Global Affairs and YouGov shows that the present weaponization of AI has flown under the radar, with most Americans largely unaware of our own military’s AI use.
asserted
Americans → show → use
Only 8 percent of Americans have heard “a lot” about the military’s use of AI in the war with Iran.
asserted
percent → hear → Iran
The majority, almost two thirds, have heard “only a little,” and four in ten have heard “nothing at all.”
asserted
four → hear → nothing
“We wanted to get a gut check on, do Americans know this is happening?” survey coauthor Jonathan Guyer said in an interview.
asserted
Guyer → want → interview
Despite a long history of US military development eventually boomeranging back home, the answer to that question might be “no”—notwithstanding Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s relentless messaging about the “AI-first Department of War.”
uncertain
answer → boomerang → War
“People would be pretty shocked that what they’re using for their homework or to summarize emails is also being used by intelligence officers,” Guyer said.
asserted
Guyer → use → officers
Cameron Stanley, the chief digital and artificial intelligence officer for the Department of Defense, wrote in June that xAI’s Grok “enabled U.S. forces to deploy over 2,000 munitions to 2,000 distinct targets within 96 hours during Operation Epic Fury.”
That admission, part of the administration’s case for the national security importance of Elon Musk’s data centers, is just the tip of the iceberg.
asserted
admission → write → iceberg
The Pentagon’s Maven Smart System, built by Palantir, also uses Anthropic’s Claude AI—the same program that people use to create AI boyfriends for themselves or draft awkward texts to their roommates—to “semi-autonomously rank targets by strategic importance, drafting automated legal justifications for each strike along the way,” according to Katie Livingstone of Military Times.
uncertain
people → build → Times
So Pentagon officials claim there’s always a human in the loop when selecting who to bomb.
uncertain
officials → claim → who
“We follow the law and humans make decisions,” Hegseth told the Senate Armed Services Committee in May.
uncertain
Hegseth → follow → May
“AI is not making lethal decisions.”
asserted
AI → make → decisions
But it’s making lethal recommendations, which don’t appear to receive enough human oversight to prevent atrocities.
asserted
which → make → atrocities
In February, the US military fired Tomahawk missiles directly at a girls’ school in Minab, Iran and killed over 150 people—most of them young children.
asserted
most → fire → them
Seven months later, UN experts called the strike a crime against humanity.
asserted
experts → call → humanity
In the immediate aftermath of the attack, much of the US news coverage focused on whether Claude was used to select the school as a target.
asserted
Claude → focus → target
But the fact that a human was at some point involved does not lessen the harm done.
asserted
human → involve → harm
At a congressional human rights hearing September 16, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Steven Feldstein explained how AI has facilitated a massive ramp-up in the speed of missile target selection.
asserted
AI → explain → selection
“In the Iran war, during the first week of hostilities alone, the Pentagon reported it had struck more than 3,000 targets,” Feldstein said.
asserted
Feldstein → report → targets
By the time a ceasefire was announced 38 days later, that number of targets had risen to 13,000.
asserted
number → announce → 13,000
“In Israel, AI targeting systems have played a crucial role in supporting its military campaign against Gaza,” Feldstein added.
asserted
Feldstein → play → Gaza
One system, known as Lavender, identified 37,000 individuals as potential airstrike targets in the initial weeks of the war.
asserted
system → know → war
As AI companies make their way onto the battlefield, Feldstein said, “the scale of atrocities committed by warring parties is rising correspondingly.”
asserted
scale → make → parties
In January of this year, Pete Hegseth released a memo directing the United States to embed AI in every part of the “kill chain.”
asserted
Hegseth → release → chain
As it moves to comply, the Department of Defense is placing relatively few checks on what technology companies can or cannot do when the United States is waging war.
asserted
States → move → war
“We’re in a situation where the companies are essentially regulating themselves,” Guyer, of the Institute for Global Affairs, said.
asserted
Guyer → ’re → Affairs
Ethical principles for AI use that the Department of Defense adopted in 2020 only require military AI to be “governable” by humans.
asserted
Department → adopt → humans
And the additional safeguards AI policy groups tend to propose revolve around stopping fully automated technology—not regulating the semi-autonomous technology that is already being used to kill at scale.
asserted
that → tend → scale
As American policymakers debate potential future AI threats, it seems as though the immediate threat of AI—the ongoing expansion of those “kill chains”—is not even making it into the AI safety discussion.
asserted
threat → debate → discussion
Nor are the victims of AI-assisted warmaking.
asserted
victims → assist → warmaking
That means tech companies are still the ones making the rules: “Their terms of service are defining how AI systems are being used for war to a greater extent than any laws that have been written, or to a greater extent than even executive branch guidelines,” Guyer said.
asserted
Guyer → mean → guidelines
The Aporia
