Photo via The Guardian

Is Trump’s AI obsession walking the world into disaster? – podcast

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Freedland, P. b. J., Rogers, p. b. J., & Ebtehaj, N. S. t. e. p. i. M. (2026, September 18). Is Trump’s AI obsession walking the world into disaster? – podcast. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/audio/2026/sep/18/is-trumps-ai-obsession-walking-the-world-into-disaster-podcast

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-18 · by Presented by Jonathan Freedland, produced by John Rogers, Nada Smiljanic; the executive producer is Maz Ebtehaj

Quick Summary

Jonathan Freedland discusses on The Guardian's Politics Weekly YouTube channel whether President Trump’s enthusiasm for artificial intelligence could lead to global risks. Tech leaders advocate for stricter regulations and government oversight on AI development, but Trump dismisses these concerns as a hoax. In conversation with Guardian US tech editor Blake Montgomery, Freedland explores the reasons behind Trump's support of the AI industry despite warnings about potential dangers.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Tech executives are urging the US government to slow down development in artificial intelligence (AI) and introduce formal regulations. However, President Trump, seemingly unbothered by warnings of potential risks from AI, dismisses these concerns as a 'hoax'. The Guardian's Jonathan Freedland discusses this with Blake Montgomery, the US tech editor for The Guardian, exploring why Trump remains supportive of the AI industry despite growing apprehensions about its future impacts.

Written for “Trump AI Obsession” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump AI Obsession
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A reports on Trump's specific rants about AI on Truth Social inspiring calls for his removal under the 25th Amendment, while Article B discusses a podcast about Trump’s stance on AI and its implications.”
CBS News
Hedges 2 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and perspectives on President Trump's stance on AI without clearly describing the same specific occurrence.”
Newscast Different event
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 13 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss similar themes but refer to different discussions and speakers on the topic of AI regulation.”
Americast Different event
BBC News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss similar topics related to President Trump's stance on artificial intelligence but describe different events and contexts.”
NBC News
Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects related to Trump's stance on AI but do not report on the same specific incident or occurrence.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different aspects and contexts related to Trump's stance on AI, not the same specific incident.”
CBS News
Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes an interview with David Sacks about AI safeguards, while Article B discusses a podcast on President Trump's stance towards AI, which are different events.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 14 claims
“The articles discuss different aspects related to AI and economics but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes a specific live call and interruption by Trump during an Nvidia event, while Article B discusses a broader podcast about Trump's stance on AI.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
4
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 4 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2798 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Presented by Jonathan Freedland
4 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 - Buy your tickets to the Guardian’s post-midterms live event, hosted by Jonathan Freedland - Watch Jonathan Freedland on our new Politics Weekly YouTube channel - Send your questions and feedback to politicsweeklyamerica@theguardian.com - Watch Stateside’s episode on attacks on voter rights in the US What will Trump do if he loses in November?
🔮 Jonathan Freedland speaks to the Guardian’s Shrai Popat about why Trump seems weaker these days, but why it could be dangerous to underestimate him
Also by Presented by Jonathan Freedland
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
produced by John Rogers
1 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
The only article under this byline in the corpus.
Nada Smiljanic; the executive producer is Maz Ebtehaj
1 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Guardian Politics Weekly

Subjects

Jonathan Freedland PERSON · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Blake Montgomery PERSON · 1× Guardian ORG · 1× Politics Weekly ORG · 1×

Narrative

- Watch Jonathan Freedland on our new Politics Weekly YouTube channel - Send your questions and feedback to politicsweeklyamerica@theguardian.com - Listen to the latest season of Black Box Is Trump’s AI obsession walking the world into disaster? – podcast Tech bosses have called for a slowdown in artificial intelligence and the creation of formal guardrails from the US government.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
2026-09-18 · The Guardian
Is Trump’s AI obsession walking the world into disaster? – podcast · assertive framing

Claims (4 extracted, 0 hedged)

- Watch Jonathan Freedland on our new Politics Weekly YouTube channel - Send your questions and feedback to politicsweeklyamerica@theguardian.com - Listen to the latest season of Black Box Is Trump’s AI obsession walking the world into disaster? – podcast Tech bosses have called for a slowdown in artificial intelligence and the creation of formal guardrails from the US government. asserted
bosses → watch → government
But why is President Trump unmoved by the doomsday predictions, dismissing them as a ‘hoax’? asserted
Trump → dismiss → hoax
What lies behind his embrace of the AI industry? asserted
What → lie → industry
Jonathan Freedland speaks to the Guardian US tech editor, Blake Montgomery asserted
Freedland → speak → editor
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support