Photo via The Independent

Trump opens loophole allowing companies to kill endangered animals

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Brown, M. (2026, September 18). Trump opens loophole allowing companies to kill endangered animals. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-endangered-species-act-logging-b3052360.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-09-18 · by Matthew Brown

Quick Summary

President Trump’s administration has altered the interpretation of the Endangered Species Act, allowing companies to avoid legal repercussions if they unintentionally kill protected animals during activities like logging or construction. This change was detailed in a September 14 directive from Fish and Wildlife Service Director Brian Nesvik, which states that such harm must be deliberate to be considered illegal. Critics argue this undermines conservation efforts by permitting actions that foreseeably lead to the death of endangered species without legal consequence.
Written by AI on 2026-09-20, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Trump administration is moving to reinterpret the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in a way that would exempt companies from legal repercussions if they accidentally harm or kill protected species during activities like logging or dam construction. This shift was detailed in an internal memo distributed by Brian Nesvik, the director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, to FWS field offices on September 14, 2023. Historically, such actions would have been considered illegal under the ESA's broad definition of "take," which includes accidental harm or killing of endangered species. The new interpretation narrows this definition to only include intentional acts aimed at harming protected animals and plants. Environmental advocates like Dan Ashe, former director of FWS, argue that this reinterpretation undermines core protections for endangered species, potentially allowing industries to proceed with projects knowing they may result in the death or injury of imperiled wildlife without facing legal consequences.

Written for “Endangered Species Protections Weakened” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 5 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Endangered Species Protections Weakened
Environment · 6 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
Hedges 2 of 21 claims Outlet record 64/100
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Guardian
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Euronews
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 60/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 26 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses a policy change under Trump's administration regarding the Endangered Species Act, while Article B critiques the broader historical context of wild mustang slaughter regardless of presidential administrations.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
22
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
1 of 22 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
6
Environment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3510 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Matthew Brown
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 President Donald Trump is expected to announce plans Tuesday to loosen a Biden-era rule that aimed to reduce planet-warming emissions of methane from oil and gas drilling.
🔮 Defense attorney Neal Hamilton said Carter will be placed in an extended stay accommodation near the family of his son, who was adopted by another family as an infant and didn’t learn about the conviction until years later.
🔮 Unintentionally killing protected animals during logging or dam construction will no longer be considered illegal under a revised federal interpretation of the Endangered Species Act, marking a major policy shift under President Donald Trump’s administration.
🔮 BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — Inadvertently killing endangered animals while logging a forest or building a dam would no longer be considered illegal under a new interpretation of the Endangered Species Act by federal officials, marking a sea change by President Donald Trump’s administration in how the landmark environmental law is enforced.
Also by Matthew Brown
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by Matthew Brown →

Topics

Supreme Court U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service the Association of Zoos and Aquariums the Endangered Species Act the Fish and Wildlife Service

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 3× Nesvik PERSON · 2× Supreme Court ORG · 2× the Fish and Wildlife Service ORG · 2× Ashe GPE · 1× Barack Obama PERSON · 1× Dan Ashe PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ORG · 1× the Association of Zoos and Aquariums ORG · 1×

Narrative

Unintentionally killing protected animals during logging or dam construction will no longer be considered illegal under a revised federal interpretation of the Endangered Species Act, marking a major policy shift under President Donald Trump’s administration.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-20
🔮 Unintentionally killing protected animals during logging or dam construction will no longer be considered illegal under a revised federal interpretation of the Endangered Species Act, marking a major policy shift under President Donald Trump’s administration.
2026-09-20 · The Independent
Trump opens loophole allowing companies to kill endangered animals · assertive framing

Claims (22 extracted, 1 hedged)

Unintentionally killing protected animals during logging or dam construction will no longer be considered illegal under a revised federal interpretation of the Endangered Species Act, marking a major policy shift under President Donald Trump’s administration. asserted
killing → kill → administration
A directive sent to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service employees this week establishes that imperiled plants or animals must be deliberately targeted for their killing to be considered unlawful. asserted
killing → send → employees
The policy represents a sharp departure from past agency practice, which held parties accountable for accidentally harming protected species such as grizzly bears, manatees, and spotted owls. asserted
parties → represent → bears
Experts warn the rule lets logging companies clear Pacific Northwest forests knowing imperiled birds will die, or developers build dams despite knowing salmon will be killed. asserted
salmon → warn → dams
"This cuts against the entire history of the Endangered Species Act," said Dan Ashe, who led the Fish and Wildlife Service under former President Barack Obama. asserted
who → cut → Obama
"It just creates a huge loophole," added Ashe, who is now president of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums. asserted
who → create → Zoos
"It completely relieves people of any responsibility for their actions, even consequences that can be easily predicted." asserted
that → relieve → actions
Encouraged by Republican lawmakers and industry lobbyists, officials under Trump have moved to roll back key protections and exempt companies from regulations. asserted
officials → encourage → regulations
Administration officials say they are returning the law to its original intent following a 2024 Supreme Court decision limiting agency authority to interpret congressional laws. asserted
they → say → laws
States and conservation groups have filed numerous lawsuits seeking to overturn the changes. asserted
States → file → changes
The updated interpretation of what constitutes illegal harm — or a "take" — was detailed in a Sept. 14 directive from Fish and Wildlife Service Director Brian Nesvik. asserted
what → update → Nesvik
"Felling a tree is not a take of the bats roosting in it unless the tree is felled for the purpose of killing or capturing them," Nesvik wrote, adding that the bats would only be impacted "indirectly and accidentally." asserted
bats → fell → them
The directive, reported earlier by The New York Times, leans on a dissenting opinion from former Justice Antonin Scalia in a 1995 Supreme Court case. asserted
directive → report → case
It follows a July rule from the wildlife service that narrowed the definition of "harm" under the Endangered Species Act, or ESA. asserted
that → follow → Act
Nesvik's directive will guide how that rule is implemented, according to a Thursday statement from the Interior Department, which includes the Fish and Wildlife Service. uncertain
which → guide → Service
"Under the guidance, the ESA’s prohibition on ‘take’ continues to prohibit conduct including harassing, pursuing, hunting, shooting, wounding, killing, trapping, capturing or collecting protected wildlife," Interior Department officials said. asserted
officials → continue → wildlife
For decades, federal policy defined harm broadly to cover habitat destruction. asserted
policy → define → destruction
Conservationists warn the changes will accelerate extinctions by permitting habitat loss and unpunished deaths of protected species. asserted
changes → warn → species
"This is basically a free for all," said Noah Greenwald with the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group. asserted
Greenwald → say → Diversity
"It's a radical reinterpretation that would put polluters and other industry before the natural world." asserted
that → put → world
The Endangered Species Act is credited with rescuing iconic animals — including the bald eagle, American alligator, and California condor — from the brink of extinction. asserted
Act → credit → extinction
Republicans rolled back several provisions of the law during Trump’s first term, moves reversed under Democratic President Joe Biden, then revived during Trump's second term. asserted
Republicans → roll → term
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support