Photo via Toronto Star

This is modern capitalism in action: Corporations get the rewards; Canadians take the risks

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

This is modern capitalism in action: Corporations get the rewards; Canadians take the risks. (2026, September 18). Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/letters-to-the-editor/this-is-modern-capitalism-in-action-corporations-get-the-rewards-canadians-take-the-risks/article_86ab7792-1a0e-45c8-9ff7-587e0a3e7c31.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-18 · by Unknown

Quick Summary

The article discusses Prime Minister Mark Carney's plan to sell Canada’s major airports as part of a strategy to combat economic crisis caused by tariffs, raising concerns about deregulation and the risks faced by Canadians compared to corporate investors. Critics argue that this privatization could undermine environmental protections, indigenous rights, and public services like healthcare and housing while increasing costs for citizens. The author suggests Carney might be using the crisis to implement changes similar to those described in Naomi Klein's "The Shock Doctrine," which outlines how crises can be exploited to advance neoliberal policies.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In modern Canadian capitalism, Prime Minister Mark Carney is pushing for the sale of major airports and other infrastructure projects, with proceeds intended for further development. This move allows private investors to acquire stable, profitable assets while shifting riskier investments onto Canadians. From 1945 to 1975, up to 25% of Canadian public debt was managed by the Bank of Canada, which funded significant national infrastructure projects without relying on external investors. Critics argue that Carney's current strategy prioritizes corporate profits over long-term public benefit and stability. The plan raises concerns about whether it is being used as a pretext for deregulation during economic uncertainty caused by Trump’s tariffs.

Written for “Corporate Rewards Canadian Risks” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Corporate Rewards Canadian Risks
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
National Post
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 3 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different topics and contexts related to government policies and economic issues, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 1 of 52 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to Canadian politics and economics but do not describe the same specific incident.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 0 of 54 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Prime Minister Mark Carney's policies and initiatives related to infrastructure investment in Canada, but they do not describe the same specific incident or happening.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 4 of 25 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different government initiatives related to infrastructure and Indigenous communities but describe distinct events.”
The Bulwark
Hedges 1 of 3 claims
“The articles cover different topics: one discusses Canada's economic policies regarding public infrastructure, while the other focuses on Canada's geopolitical shift towards Europe and away from the U.S.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 6 claims Outlet record 52/100
“Article A provides historical context and criticizes the current plan, while Article B reports on NDP Leader Avi Lewis's statement against the government's airport privatization plan at a press conference.”
Global News
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 63/100
“Article A describes the announcement of a plan to seek private investment in Canada's airports while retaining government ownership, whereas Article B criticizes the current approach and suggests selling off airports, indicating different specific actions or proposals.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 1 of 33 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Mark Carney's plan to privatize Canadian airports, but Article A focuses on the announcement and its implications for productivity and investment, while Article B critiques the broader context and risks associated with such privatization efforts.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A reports on Prime Minister Carney's announcement about private investors running Canada's four largest airports, while Article B critiques a broader shift in government policy regarding infrastructure funding and mentions Carney's plans but does not describe the same specific event.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 52/100
“Article A describes a statement by Prime Minister Carney at an investment summit about private investors running airports, while Article B provides commentary and context on the broader plan to sell off major airports.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
56
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
3 of 56 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 11229 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

No reporter is named on this article, beyond the feed's “Unknown”.

Topics

Canada Canadian Canadians the Bank of Canada the Second World War

Subjects

Carney PERSON · 5× Canada GPE · 3× Mark Carney PERSON · 3× Canadians NORP · 2× Hydro One ORG · 2× Ontario GPE · 2× Canadian NORP · 1× Larry Kazdan PERSON · 1× Vancouver GPE · 1× the Bank of Canada ORG · 1×

Narrative

Lloyd Axworthy’s column captures the contradictions of Carney’s actions: Not attending Parliament or the UN General Assembly; not defending the judges of the International Criminal Court; abandoning peacekeeping operations and climate change priorities, etc …
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 In other words, investors will get up-and-running projects with established cash flow (where prices can easily be jacked up), whereas Canadians will carry the heavier risk and less profitable investments until mature enough for private owners to buy.

Claims (56 extracted, 3 hedged)

A reminder that from the end of the Second World War through 1975, between 20—25 per cent of Canadian public debt was financed and held by the Bank of Canada. asserted
cent → finance → Canada
During that period, federal government capital expenditure funded highways, bridges, schools, hospitals and yes, even airports. asserted
expenditure → fund → highways
The government did not go begging for cash from hedge funds. asserted
government → go → funds
But today, Prime Minister Mark Carney plans to sell off Canada’s major airports and recycle the proceeds for other infrastructure. asserted
Carney → plan → infrastructure
In other words, investors will get up-and-running projects with established cash flow (where prices can easily be jacked up), whereas Canadians will carry the heavier risk and less profitable investments until mature enough for private owners to buy. asserted
owners → get → risk
Modern capitalism in action: Corporations get the rewards; Canadians pay the charges and take the risks. asserted
Canadians → get → risks
Larry Kazdan, Vancouver, B.C. Is Mark Carney using crisis as an opportunity to privatize and deregulate? asserted
Carney → use → opportunity
Prime Minister MarkCarney is implementing a nation-building strategy to combat Trump’s tariff generated economic crisis. asserted
MarkCarney → implement → crisis
It sounds good and so far we’re all on his side. asserted
we → sound → side
Is it really necessary to reduce Canada’s climate protections? asserted
it → reduce → protections
Must we overlook environmental implications to boost oil production? asserted
we → overlook → production
Should Indigenous rights be sidelined? asserted
rights → sideline → ?
Are corporate tax rates needed to be lowered to 6.4 per cent? asserted
rates → need → cent
Must we privatize our airports? asserted
we → privatize → airports
Do we really need a trillion dollar investment from outside players? asserted
we → need → players
It seems to me that Carney has read Naomi Klein’s book, “The Shock Doctrine.” asserted
Carney → seem → book
Its central idea suggests how a crisis can be used to increase privatizations and reduce regulations. uncertain
crisis → suggest → regulations
Maybe I’m just too cynical but I certainly hope this is not his underlying motivation. asserted
this → ’m → ?
John Selmys, Toronto Privatizing airports is a big mistake — just look at Hydro One Prime Minister Mark Carney says he is selling our public airports but keeping the land beneath them. asserted
he → privatize → them
That’s like selling an art museum with millions of dollars in art for a bargain price but keeping the land the museum sits on. asserted
museum → ’ → land
Carney says he is “unlocking” the value of our public airports. asserted
he → say → airports
Then says he is going to reinvest that money in other important infrastructure. asserted
he → say → infrastructure
We heard the exact same argument and plan when then Ontario premier Kathleen Wynne privatized Hydro One and sent hydro rates through the roof. asserted
Wynne → hear → roof
It used to be, privatization was only done by Conservatives. asserted
privatization → use → Conservatives
Now our public assets will be used to maximize profits for corporations. asserted
assets → use → corporations
There is no free money, investors expect a good return. asserted
investors → be → return
Given the failures and dismal record of public asset privatization here in Canada and around the world, it is astonishing that Carney continues to promote privatization of public assets and infrastructure. asserted
Carney → give → assets
Carney is engaging in public relations propaganda to pretty up profit, selling the myth it’s a beneficial way to finance infrastructure. asserted
it → engage → infrastructure
The privatization of long-term-care homes where many died from neglect during the pandemic and Highway 407 and Hydro One has left the people of Ontario with no appetite for any more privatization of public assets. asserted
many → die → assets
The privatization of Connaught labs by then prime minister Brian Mulroney also hurt us severely during the pandemic. asserted
privatization → hurt → pandemic
The privatization of rail, electricity and water and hospitals along with Brexit has made the UK’s economy a complete disaster. asserted
economy → make → Brexit
During both World Wars and the Great Depression governments did not privatize public assets. asserted
governments → privatize → assets
They wisely kept them and we worked our way out of those terrible times with a robust public sector and non-profit public enterprise. asserted
we → keep → sector
Carney and his Liberal caucus need to be reminded that the provincial Liberals were sent to the political wilderness for three elections in a row for their sale of Hydro One and the resulting rate crisis. asserted
Liberals → need → Hydro
Privatizing airports is a really big mistake. asserted
Privatizing → privatize → airports
The same goes for seaports. asserted
same → go → seaports
Paul Kahnert, Marham, ON Selling airports is an ill conceived idea This article mentions a $19 drop-off-fee at London’s Gatwick Airport. asserted
article → conceive → Airport
Gatwick is privately owned. asserted
Gatwick → own → ?
What could that look like here? uncertain
that → look → What
If you took the UP Express train to Toronto’s Pearson International Airport, would you be charged a drop off fee? asserted
you → take → fee
…and 16 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support