Sweden and Canada operate publicly financed universal health-care systems, but access to care in the Nordic country is “markedly better,” according to a new report from the Fraser Institute.
uncertain
access → operate → Institute
In 2024, wait times leading to unmet medical needs affected two per cent of Swedes, compared with 9.1 per cent of Canadians, says the report’s author, Yanick Labrie.
asserted
author → lead → Canadians
The study argues that the difference between the two national systems can be found in the way they are organized.
asserted
they → argue → way
Labrie states that almost half (46.9 per cent) of primary care centres in Sweden are privately operated, while still fully funded by public dollars.
asserted
half → state → dollars
Labrie notes that private providers in Sweden perform more than 40 per cent of publicly funded hip and knee replacements and over 70 per cent of cataract procedures.
asserted
providers → note → procedures
Private providers have also expanded surgical capacity, rather than displacing it, he suggests.
uncertain
he → expand → it
Between 2001 and 2019, the share of cataract patients treated within 90 days increased from 36.9 to 88.2 per cent while median waiting times fell from 6.2 to 1.8 months.
asserted
times → treat → months
More particularly, 85 per cent of patients receive a medical assessment within three days when needed, the study states.
asserted
study → receive → days
Labrie states that European health-care systems have attracted an increasing level attention among Canadian policymakers.
asserted
systems → state → policymakers
For example, he states that in May 2026, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith led a delegation to Sweden to learn more about the country’s approach to organizing and delivering health care within a universal system.
uncertain
Smith → state → system
Labrie notes that similar to Canada, Sweden’s health-care system is founded on the principle that access to medically necessary care should depend on need rather than ability to pay.
asserted
access → note → need
But discussions of health-care reform in Canada often become highly polarized when it comes to expanding the role of private providers, says Labrie.
asserted
Labrie → become → providers
“As a result, health-care policy discussions in Canada often focus primarily on preserving existing financing arrangements rather than examining alternative models for organizing and delivering care to Canadians.”
asserted
discussions → focus → Canadians
The primary responsibility for organizing health care falls under Sweden’s 21 regions, governed by local political assemblies.
asserted
responsibility → organize → assemblies
Regional authorities are responsible for organizing hospitals, primary care, specialist services, and provider-reimbursement systems.
asserted
authorities → organize → hospitals
In contrast, says Labrie, beginning in the early 2000s several provinces (Quebec, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia and Alberta) merged regional health authorities into larger provincial organizations, reducing the autonomy of intermediary bodies.
asserted
provinces → say → bodies
Meanwhile, in Sweden patients commonly pay modest co-payments for primary care visits, specialist consultations, emergency department visits and prescription drugs.
asserted
patients → pay → visits
Annual caps substantially limit total out-of-pocket exposure.
asserted
caps → limit → exposure
Sweden permits duplicate private health insurance for services already covered under the public system, whereas in most Canadian provinces, such insurance remains heavily restricted or prohibited.
asserted
insurance → permit → provinces
By the end of 2024 over 800,000 Swedes held duplicate health insurance coverage (15.8 per cent of the working-age population).
asserted
Swedes → hold → population
Most insurance policies are financed by employers as part of workplace benefits.
asserted
policies → finance → benefits
“In Sweden, privately insured patients continue to contribute to the public system through income taxation.
asserted
patients → insure → taxation
They do not opt out financially,” says Labrie.
asserted
Labrie → opt → ?
One of the greatest health-care needs – physician access – seems to be better met in Sweden, which according to OECD data cited by Labrie, maintains a higher physician-to-population ratio than Canada, with 4.4 physicians per 1,000 population, compared with 2.8 in Canada.
uncertain
which → seem → Canada
Sweden also has a national waiting-time guarantee aimed at improving timely access to care throughout the country.
asserted
Sweden → have → country
Sweden’s Primary Care Choice Act was implemented between 2007 and 2010.
asserted
Act → implement → 2007
The new legislation introduced patient choice among accredited primary care providers, whether publicly or privately operated.
asserted
legislation → introduce → providers
Private providers were allowed to establish new clinics and compete for patient enrolment under the country’s regional reimbursement systems.
asserted
providers → allow → systems
Overall, says Labrie, the study’s findings indicate that greater private-sector participation necessarily reduces publicly financed health-care system capacity.
asserted
participation → say → capacity
“In several areas of Sweden, private providers expanded the overall volume of publicly funded services rather than simply displacing activity from public providers.”
asserted
providers → expand → providers